J. Maskal , F.A. Cabezón , A.P. Schinckel PAS , J.N. Marchant-Forde , J.S. Johnson , R.M. Stwalley
{"title":"轻度和中度热应激条件下泌乳母猪地板冷却效果的评价","authors":"J. Maskal , F.A. Cabezón , A.P. Schinckel PAS , J.N. Marchant-Forde , J.S. Johnson , R.M. Stwalley","doi":"10.15232/pas.2017-01661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The effectiveness of sow cooling pads during lactation was evaluated under mild and moderate heat stress conditions. The moderate heat stress room was targeted to achieve 32°C from 0800 to 1600 h and 27°C for the rest of the day. The mild heat stress room was targeted to achieve 27 and 22°C for the same periods, respectively. Sows received a constant cool water flow of 0.00 (CON, n = 9), 0.25 (LWF, n = 12), or 0.50 (HWF, n = 10) L/min. Respiration rates, rectal temperatures, and skin temperatures were recorded every day (0700 and 1500 h) from the second day in the farrowing room to weaning. The respiration rates of CON sows were 23, 56, 41, and 89 breaths/min, of LWF sows were 21, 24, 29, and 41 breaths/min, and of HWF sows were 18, 20, 24, and 27 breaths/min, and respiration rate increased (<em>P</em> < 0.001) as heat stress increased from mild at 0700 h (22°C), to moderate at 0700 h (27°C), to mild at 1500 h (27°C), and to moderate at 1500 h (32°C). The skin temperatures of LWF sows were 1.1, 0.6, 0.8, and 0.4°C less and of HWF sows were 1.7, 0.7, 1.1, and 1.0°C less (<em>P</em> < 0.01) than CON sows for the same heat stress conditions. The rectal temperatures of LWF sows were 0.02, 0.20, 0.11, and 0.58°C less and of HWF sows were 0.04, 0.22, 0.02, and 0.57°C less (<em>P</em> < 0.05) for the same 4 treatments. The sow cooling pads reduced the effect of heat stress.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22841,"journal":{"name":"The Professional Animal Scientist","volume":"34 1","pages":"Pages 84-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15232/pas.2017-01661","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of floor cooling on lactating sows under mild and moderate heat stress1\",\"authors\":\"J. Maskal , F.A. Cabezón , A.P. Schinckel PAS , J.N. Marchant-Forde , J.S. Johnson , R.M. Stwalley\",\"doi\":\"10.15232/pas.2017-01661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The effectiveness of sow cooling pads during lactation was evaluated under mild and moderate heat stress conditions. The moderate heat stress room was targeted to achieve 32°C from 0800 to 1600 h and 27°C for the rest of the day. The mild heat stress room was targeted to achieve 27 and 22°C for the same periods, respectively. Sows received a constant cool water flow of 0.00 (CON, n = 9), 0.25 (LWF, n = 12), or 0.50 (HWF, n = 10) L/min. Respiration rates, rectal temperatures, and skin temperatures were recorded every day (0700 and 1500 h) from the second day in the farrowing room to weaning. The respiration rates of CON sows were 23, 56, 41, and 89 breaths/min, of LWF sows were 21, 24, 29, and 41 breaths/min, and of HWF sows were 18, 20, 24, and 27 breaths/min, and respiration rate increased (<em>P</em> < 0.001) as heat stress increased from mild at 0700 h (22°C), to moderate at 0700 h (27°C), to mild at 1500 h (27°C), and to moderate at 1500 h (32°C). The skin temperatures of LWF sows were 1.1, 0.6, 0.8, and 0.4°C less and of HWF sows were 1.7, 0.7, 1.1, and 1.0°C less (<em>P</em> < 0.01) than CON sows for the same heat stress conditions. The rectal temperatures of LWF sows were 0.02, 0.20, 0.11, and 0.58°C less and of HWF sows were 0.04, 0.22, 0.02, and 0.57°C less (<em>P</em> < 0.05) for the same 4 treatments. The sow cooling pads reduced the effect of heat stress.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Professional Animal Scientist\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 84-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15232/pas.2017-01661\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Professional Animal Scientist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S108074461830010X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Professional Animal Scientist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S108074461830010X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
摘要
在轻度和中度热应激条件下,评估母猪哺乳期间冷却垫的有效性。中等热应力房间的目标是在0800至1600时达到32°C,其余时间达到27°C。轻度热应力房间的目标是在相同的时间内分别达到27°C和22°C。母猪接受的恒定冷水流量分别为0.00 (CON, n = 9)、0.25 (LWF, n = 12)和0.50 (HWF, n = 10) L/min。从产房第二天到断奶,每天(0700和1500h)记录呼吸率、直肠温度和皮肤温度。CON母猪的呼吸频率分别为23、56、41和89次/min, LWF母猪的呼吸频率分别为21、24、29和41次/min, HWF母猪的呼吸频率分别为18、20、24和27次/min,呼吸频率均有所增加(P <0.001),随着热应力从0700 h(22°C)的轻度,0700 h(27°C)的中度,1500 h(27°C)的轻度和1500 h(32°C)的中度增加。LWF母猪的皮肤温度分别低1.1、0.6、0.8和0.4℃,HWF母猪的皮肤温度分别低1.7、0.7、1.1和1.0℃(P <在相同的热应激条件下,与CON母猪相比,母猪的产奶量为0.01)。LWF母猪直肠温度分别低0.02、0.20、0.11和0.58°C, HWF母猪直肠温度分别低0.04、0.22、0.02和0.57°C (P <0.05)。母猪冷却垫降低了热应激的影响。
Evaluation of floor cooling on lactating sows under mild and moderate heat stress1
The effectiveness of sow cooling pads during lactation was evaluated under mild and moderate heat stress conditions. The moderate heat stress room was targeted to achieve 32°C from 0800 to 1600 h and 27°C for the rest of the day. The mild heat stress room was targeted to achieve 27 and 22°C for the same periods, respectively. Sows received a constant cool water flow of 0.00 (CON, n = 9), 0.25 (LWF, n = 12), or 0.50 (HWF, n = 10) L/min. Respiration rates, rectal temperatures, and skin temperatures were recorded every day (0700 and 1500 h) from the second day in the farrowing room to weaning. The respiration rates of CON sows were 23, 56, 41, and 89 breaths/min, of LWF sows were 21, 24, 29, and 41 breaths/min, and of HWF sows were 18, 20, 24, and 27 breaths/min, and respiration rate increased (P < 0.001) as heat stress increased from mild at 0700 h (22°C), to moderate at 0700 h (27°C), to mild at 1500 h (27°C), and to moderate at 1500 h (32°C). The skin temperatures of LWF sows were 1.1, 0.6, 0.8, and 0.4°C less and of HWF sows were 1.7, 0.7, 1.1, and 1.0°C less (P < 0.01) than CON sows for the same heat stress conditions. The rectal temperatures of LWF sows were 0.02, 0.20, 0.11, and 0.58°C less and of HWF sows were 0.04, 0.22, 0.02, and 0.57°C less (P < 0.05) for the same 4 treatments. The sow cooling pads reduced the effect of heat stress.