聊天技术时代,医疗人工智能能否取代医生?

S. Kim
{"title":"聊天技术时代,医疗人工智能能否取代医生?","authors":"S. Kim","doi":"10.3904/kjm.2023.98.3.99","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whether artificial intelligence (AI) can replace the role of doctors has seriously been discussed since the appearance of Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT). Unlike past expectations that limit the role of AI in the medical field, doctors seem to both admire and be threatened by recent advances in AI models. Because previously developed and approved AI models have been managed and reviewed by medical experts during the preparation, refining, annotation, and verification of data, those systems can be considered to be based on evidence-based medicine. However, the current version of the ChatGPT model derives the most meaningful results from unverified open data. This approach enhances the accessibility to new information but is significantly different from the methodology of evidence-based medicine. Like all AI models developed to date, ChatGPT needs a system that can be rigorously verified and regulated by doctors to facilitate its use in the medical field.","PeriodicalId":84452,"journal":{"name":"Chungang uihak = The Korean central journal of medicine","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In the Era of ChatGPT, Can Medical Artificial Intelligence Replace the Doctor?\",\"authors\":\"S. Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.3904/kjm.2023.98.3.99\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Whether artificial intelligence (AI) can replace the role of doctors has seriously been discussed since the appearance of Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT). Unlike past expectations that limit the role of AI in the medical field, doctors seem to both admire and be threatened by recent advances in AI models. Because previously developed and approved AI models have been managed and reviewed by medical experts during the preparation, refining, annotation, and verification of data, those systems can be considered to be based on evidence-based medicine. However, the current version of the ChatGPT model derives the most meaningful results from unverified open data. This approach enhances the accessibility to new information but is significantly different from the methodology of evidence-based medicine. Like all AI models developed to date, ChatGPT needs a system that can be rigorously verified and regulated by doctors to facilitate its use in the medical field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":84452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chungang uihak = The Korean central journal of medicine\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chungang uihak = The Korean central journal of medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3904/kjm.2023.98.3.99\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chungang uihak = The Korean central journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3904/kjm.2023.98.3.99","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自从聊天生成预训练转换器(ChatGPT)出现以来,人工智能(AI)能否取代医生的角色一直是人们认真讨论的话题。与过去限制人工智能在医疗领域的作用的期望不同,医生们似乎对人工智能模型的最新进展既钦佩又感到威胁。由于以前开发和批准的人工智能模型在数据的准备、提炼、注释和验证过程中已由医学专家进行管理和审查,因此这些系统可以被认为是基于循证医学的。然而,当前版本的ChatGPT模型从未经验证的开放数据中获得最有意义的结果。这种方法提高了对新信息的可及性,但与循证医学的方法有很大不同。像迄今为止开发的所有人工智能模型一样,ChatGPT需要一个可以由医生严格验证和监管的系统,以促进其在医疗领域的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In the Era of ChatGPT, Can Medical Artificial Intelligence Replace the Doctor?
Whether artificial intelligence (AI) can replace the role of doctors has seriously been discussed since the appearance of Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT). Unlike past expectations that limit the role of AI in the medical field, doctors seem to both admire and be threatened by recent advances in AI models. Because previously developed and approved AI models have been managed and reviewed by medical experts during the preparation, refining, annotation, and verification of data, those systems can be considered to be based on evidence-based medicine. However, the current version of the ChatGPT model derives the most meaningful results from unverified open data. This approach enhances the accessibility to new information but is significantly different from the methodology of evidence-based medicine. Like all AI models developed to date, ChatGPT needs a system that can be rigorously verified and regulated by doctors to facilitate its use in the medical field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信