网络研讨会报告:国际脊椎动物技术虚拟研讨会- SEVIIV2021

IF 0.8 4区 地球科学 Q4 PALEONTOLOGY
Ricardo Melchor
{"title":"网络研讨会报告:国际脊椎动物技术虚拟研讨会- SEVIIV2021","authors":"Ricardo Melchor","doi":"10.1080/10420940.2021.1998037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SEVIIV2021 was a scientific webinar on vertebrate ichnology hosted by the Universidad Nacional de La Pampa and the Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa, that was convened on five half-day sessions developed between June 14-18, 2021. This virtual activity was effective in facilitating discussions and interchange between experienced vertebrate ichnologists and graduate students. Spanish and Portuguese were the languages of this free seminar that included 33 talks and an average audience of 140 participants per day. Presentations were delivered by vertebrate ichnologists from nine countries, including Giuseppe Leonardi (Italy), Martin Lockley (USA), Silvério Figueiredo (Portugal); Félix Pérez Lorente, José Joaquín Moratalla García, Laura Piñuela, and Diego Castanera (Spain); Karen Moreno and Jorge Campos (Chile); Mariano Verde and Valeria Mesa (Uruguay); Eduardo Jiménez Hidalgo, Rosalía Guerrero, Felisa J. Aguilar Arellano, Víctor Manuel Bravo Cuevas, and Rubén Rodríguez de la Rosa (Mexico); Ismar de Souza Carvalho, Paula Dentzien-Dias, Caio César Rangel, and Heitor Francischini (Brazil); Teresa Manera, Bernardo González Riga, María Belén Tomaselli, Carlos Cónsole-Gonella, Silvina de Valais, Ignacio Díaz-Martínez, Paolo Citton, Jorge Orlando Calvo, María Cristina Cardonatto, Verónica Krapovickas, Nahuel Espinoza, Manuel Rojas Manriquez, and Arturo Heredia (Argentina). The topics covered were diverse including dinosaur tracks (perhaps the more common theme); protection of the ichnological heritage; factors affecting the formation and preservation of footprints; ichnotaxonomy; regional or basinal synthesis of the vertebrate ichnological record; paleoenvironmental, paleoecological and evolutionary aspects of vertebrate trace fossils; importance of osteological studies for the interpretation of tracks; modern and fossil tetrapod burrows; coprolites; and human footprints in archeological settings. The talks are stored in the CPA UNLPam YouTube channel, separated in individual links related to each day (day 1: https://youtu.be/-pa8-pTynW4, day 2: https://youtu.be/ fXCkozfTjzc, day 3: https://youtu.be/CExQVQ78iBE, day 4: https://youtu.be/ZgcuEI0DG-I, day 5: https:// youtu.be/orYEpDcPbtE). The talks and lively discussions invite some reflections on current aspects of the discipline, at least from the Latin ichnological community. It is well known that the approaches of invertebrate and vertebrate ichnology are different (e.g. Bromley, 2004; Lockley, 2007). This webinar also revealed that even between vertebrate ichnologists there are differences or shades in the purposes of the study of trace fossils and the methodology they employ. A good example of this fact is that several vertebrate ichnologists are reluctant to use or even do not “believe” in ichnotaxonomy. This position is probably linked with the complicated formative and taphonomical processes of footprints, and the resulting preservational variants (Marchetti et al., 2019), in addition to the purposes of the study. Another aspect is that only a small fraction of the footprint record of a given unit can be confidently compared with definite ichnotaxa, which arguably leaves a large amount of potential information in the rocks. Some talks highlighted that fossil footprints are considerably more common than bone remains. Growing evidence suggest that the information to be obtained from footprints is potentially more representative and relevant for reconstruction of past communities than the osteological record. However, both records are complementary and important. Several talks emphasized that vertebrate trace fossils should be studied along with a detailed description of the hosting sedimentary rocks to avoid potential mistakes and to unlock the maximum information from trace fossils.","PeriodicalId":51057,"journal":{"name":"Ichnos-An International Journal for Plant and Animal Traces","volume":"13 1","pages":"321 - 322"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Webinar report: Seminario Virtual Internacional de Icnología de Vertebrados – SEVIIV2021\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo Melchor\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10420940.2021.1998037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SEVIIV2021 was a scientific webinar on vertebrate ichnology hosted by the Universidad Nacional de La Pampa and the Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa, that was convened on five half-day sessions developed between June 14-18, 2021. This virtual activity was effective in facilitating discussions and interchange between experienced vertebrate ichnologists and graduate students. Spanish and Portuguese were the languages of this free seminar that included 33 talks and an average audience of 140 participants per day. Presentations were delivered by vertebrate ichnologists from nine countries, including Giuseppe Leonardi (Italy), Martin Lockley (USA), Silvério Figueiredo (Portugal); Félix Pérez Lorente, José Joaquín Moratalla García, Laura Piñuela, and Diego Castanera (Spain); Karen Moreno and Jorge Campos (Chile); Mariano Verde and Valeria Mesa (Uruguay); Eduardo Jiménez Hidalgo, Rosalía Guerrero, Felisa J. Aguilar Arellano, Víctor Manuel Bravo Cuevas, and Rubén Rodríguez de la Rosa (Mexico); Ismar de Souza Carvalho, Paula Dentzien-Dias, Caio César Rangel, and Heitor Francischini (Brazil); Teresa Manera, Bernardo González Riga, María Belén Tomaselli, Carlos Cónsole-Gonella, Silvina de Valais, Ignacio Díaz-Martínez, Paolo Citton, Jorge Orlando Calvo, María Cristina Cardonatto, Verónica Krapovickas, Nahuel Espinoza, Manuel Rojas Manriquez, and Arturo Heredia (Argentina). The topics covered were diverse including dinosaur tracks (perhaps the more common theme); protection of the ichnological heritage; factors affecting the formation and preservation of footprints; ichnotaxonomy; regional or basinal synthesis of the vertebrate ichnological record; paleoenvironmental, paleoecological and evolutionary aspects of vertebrate trace fossils; importance of osteological studies for the interpretation of tracks; modern and fossil tetrapod burrows; coprolites; and human footprints in archeological settings. The talks are stored in the CPA UNLPam YouTube channel, separated in individual links related to each day (day 1: https://youtu.be/-pa8-pTynW4, day 2: https://youtu.be/ fXCkozfTjzc, day 3: https://youtu.be/CExQVQ78iBE, day 4: https://youtu.be/ZgcuEI0DG-I, day 5: https:// youtu.be/orYEpDcPbtE). The talks and lively discussions invite some reflections on current aspects of the discipline, at least from the Latin ichnological community. It is well known that the approaches of invertebrate and vertebrate ichnology are different (e.g. Bromley, 2004; Lockley, 2007). This webinar also revealed that even between vertebrate ichnologists there are differences or shades in the purposes of the study of trace fossils and the methodology they employ. A good example of this fact is that several vertebrate ichnologists are reluctant to use or even do not “believe” in ichnotaxonomy. This position is probably linked with the complicated formative and taphonomical processes of footprints, and the resulting preservational variants (Marchetti et al., 2019), in addition to the purposes of the study. Another aspect is that only a small fraction of the footprint record of a given unit can be confidently compared with definite ichnotaxa, which arguably leaves a large amount of potential information in the rocks. Some talks highlighted that fossil footprints are considerably more common than bone remains. Growing evidence suggest that the information to be obtained from footprints is potentially more representative and relevant for reconstruction of past communities than the osteological record. However, both records are complementary and important. Several talks emphasized that vertebrate trace fossils should be studied along with a detailed description of the hosting sedimentary rocks to avoid potential mistakes and to unlock the maximum information from trace fossils.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ichnos-An International Journal for Plant and Animal Traces\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"321 - 322\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ichnos-An International Journal for Plant and Animal Traces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10420940.2021.1998037\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PALEONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ichnos-An International Journal for Plant and Animal Traces","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10420940.2021.1998037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PALEONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

SEVIIV2021是由La Pampa国立大学和La Pampa环境科学研究所主办的脊椎动物技术科学网络研讨会,于2021年6月14日至18日召开了五个半天的会议。这个虚拟活动有效地促进了经验丰富的脊椎动物技术专家和研究生之间的讨论和交流。西班牙语和葡萄牙语是这个免费研讨会的语言,包括33场演讲,平均每天有140名与会者。来自9个国家的脊椎动物技术专家发表了演讲,包括Giuseppe Leonardi(意大利)、Martin Lockley(美国)、silv rio Figueiredo(葡萄牙);fxlix penjoz Lorente, jos Joaquín Moratalla García, Laura Piñuela和Diego Castanera(西班牙);卡伦·莫雷诺和豪尔赫·坎波斯(智利);马里亚诺·韦德和瓦莱里亚·梅萨(乌拉圭);爱德华多·吉米·伊达尔戈、Rosalía格雷罗、费利萨·j·阿吉拉尔·阿雷利亚诺、Víctor曼努埃尔·布拉沃·奎瓦斯和鲁巴姆·德拉罗莎(墨西哥);Ismar de Souza Carvalho、Paula Dentzien-Dias、Caio csamrangel和Heitor Francischini(巴西);特蕾莎·马内拉、贝尔纳多González里加、María贝尔梅扬·托马塞利、卡洛斯Cónsole-Gonella、西尔维娜·德瓦莱、伊格纳西奥Díaz-Martínez、保罗·西顿、豪尔赫·奥兰多·卡尔沃、María克里斯蒂娜·卡多纳托、Verónica克拉波维卡斯、纳韦尔·埃斯皮诺萨、曼努埃尔·罗哈斯·曼里克斯和阿图罗·埃雷迪亚(阿根廷)。涵盖的主题多种多样,包括恐龙足迹(可能是更常见的主题);保护技术遗产;影响足迹形成和保存的因素;ichnotaxonomy;脊椎动物技术记录的区域或盆地综合;脊椎动物痕迹化石的古环境、古生态和进化研究骨学研究对足迹解释的重要性现代和化石四足动物的洞穴;粪化石;以及考古环境中的人类足迹。演讲存储在CPA UNLPam YouTube频道中,以与每一天相关的单独链接分开(第一天:https://youtu.be/-pa8-pTynW4,第二天:https://youtu.be/ fXCkozfTjzc,第三天:https://youtu.be/CExQVQ78iBE,第四天:https://youtu.be/ZgcuEI0DG-I,第五天:https:// YouTube .be/orYEpDcPbtE)。会谈和热烈的讨论邀请了对该学科当前方面的一些反思,至少来自拉丁技术社区。众所周知,无脊椎动物和脊椎动物技术的方法是不同的(例如Bromley, 2004;Lockley, 2007)。这次网络研讨会还揭示了即使在脊椎动物技术学家之间,在研究痕迹化石的目的和他们采用的方法上也存在差异或阴影。这一事实的一个很好的例子是,一些脊椎动物技术学家不愿意使用甚至不“相信”技术分类学。除了研究的目的外,这一位置可能与脚印复杂的形成和地理过程以及由此产生的保存变异(Marchetti et al., 2019)有关。另一个方面是,一个给定单位的足迹记录中只有一小部分可以自信地与确定的ichnotaxa进行比较,这可以说在岩石中留下了大量潜在的信息。一些谈话强调,化石足迹比骨骼遗骸普遍得多。越来越多的证据表明,从脚印中获得的信息可能比骨学记录更有代表性和相关性,可以用来重建过去的社区。然而,这两种记录是互补的,而且很重要。几次会谈强调,脊椎动物痕迹化石应该与沉积岩石的详细描述一起研究,以避免潜在的错误,并从痕迹化石中获得最大的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Webinar report: Seminario Virtual Internacional de Icnología de Vertebrados – SEVIIV2021
SEVIIV2021 was a scientific webinar on vertebrate ichnology hosted by the Universidad Nacional de La Pampa and the Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa, that was convened on five half-day sessions developed between June 14-18, 2021. This virtual activity was effective in facilitating discussions and interchange between experienced vertebrate ichnologists and graduate students. Spanish and Portuguese were the languages of this free seminar that included 33 talks and an average audience of 140 participants per day. Presentations were delivered by vertebrate ichnologists from nine countries, including Giuseppe Leonardi (Italy), Martin Lockley (USA), Silvério Figueiredo (Portugal); Félix Pérez Lorente, José Joaquín Moratalla García, Laura Piñuela, and Diego Castanera (Spain); Karen Moreno and Jorge Campos (Chile); Mariano Verde and Valeria Mesa (Uruguay); Eduardo Jiménez Hidalgo, Rosalía Guerrero, Felisa J. Aguilar Arellano, Víctor Manuel Bravo Cuevas, and Rubén Rodríguez de la Rosa (Mexico); Ismar de Souza Carvalho, Paula Dentzien-Dias, Caio César Rangel, and Heitor Francischini (Brazil); Teresa Manera, Bernardo González Riga, María Belén Tomaselli, Carlos Cónsole-Gonella, Silvina de Valais, Ignacio Díaz-Martínez, Paolo Citton, Jorge Orlando Calvo, María Cristina Cardonatto, Verónica Krapovickas, Nahuel Espinoza, Manuel Rojas Manriquez, and Arturo Heredia (Argentina). The topics covered were diverse including dinosaur tracks (perhaps the more common theme); protection of the ichnological heritage; factors affecting the formation and preservation of footprints; ichnotaxonomy; regional or basinal synthesis of the vertebrate ichnological record; paleoenvironmental, paleoecological and evolutionary aspects of vertebrate trace fossils; importance of osteological studies for the interpretation of tracks; modern and fossil tetrapod burrows; coprolites; and human footprints in archeological settings. The talks are stored in the CPA UNLPam YouTube channel, separated in individual links related to each day (day 1: https://youtu.be/-pa8-pTynW4, day 2: https://youtu.be/ fXCkozfTjzc, day 3: https://youtu.be/CExQVQ78iBE, day 4: https://youtu.be/ZgcuEI0DG-I, day 5: https:// youtu.be/orYEpDcPbtE). The talks and lively discussions invite some reflections on current aspects of the discipline, at least from the Latin ichnological community. It is well known that the approaches of invertebrate and vertebrate ichnology are different (e.g. Bromley, 2004; Lockley, 2007). This webinar also revealed that even between vertebrate ichnologists there are differences or shades in the purposes of the study of trace fossils and the methodology they employ. A good example of this fact is that several vertebrate ichnologists are reluctant to use or even do not “believe” in ichnotaxonomy. This position is probably linked with the complicated formative and taphonomical processes of footprints, and the resulting preservational variants (Marchetti et al., 2019), in addition to the purposes of the study. Another aspect is that only a small fraction of the footprint record of a given unit can be confidently compared with definite ichnotaxa, which arguably leaves a large amount of potential information in the rocks. Some talks highlighted that fossil footprints are considerably more common than bone remains. Growing evidence suggest that the information to be obtained from footprints is potentially more representative and relevant for reconstruction of past communities than the osteological record. However, both records are complementary and important. Several talks emphasized that vertebrate trace fossils should be studied along with a detailed description of the hosting sedimentary rocks to avoid potential mistakes and to unlock the maximum information from trace fossils.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The foremost aim of Ichnos is to promote excellence in ichnologic research. Primary emphases center upon the ethologic and ecologic significance of tracemaking organisms; organism-substrate interrelationships; and the role of biogenic processes in environmental reconstruction, sediment dynamics, sequence or event stratigraphy, biogeochemistry, and sedimentary diagenesis. Each contribution rests upon a firm taxonomic foundation, although papers dealing solely with systematics and nomenclature may have less priority than those dealing with conceptual and interpretive aspects of ichnology. Contributions from biologists and geologists are equally welcome. The format for Ichnos is designed to accommodate several types of manuscripts, including Research Articles (comprehensive articles dealing with original, fundamental research in ichnology), and Short Communications (short, succinct papers treating certain aspects of the history of ichnology, book reviews, news and notes, or invited comments dealing with current or contentious issues). The large page size and two-column format lend flexibility to the design of tables and illustrations. Thorough but timely reviews and rapid publication of manuscripts are integral parts of the process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信