与自闭症更进一步:交流的感性基础

Q2 Arts and Humanities
B. Brock
{"title":"与自闭症更进一步:交流的感性基础","authors":"B. Brock","doi":"10.1080/23312521.2022.2051679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I am in Joanna Leidenhag’s debt for so clearly describing how my account of doxology asks a new question in order to advance current scholarly discussions about the contribution of people with disabilities to the life of the church: “How do we receive those who bear the label ‘disabled’ or ‘autistic,’ as a word of judgment from the Spirit calling the church into the likeness of Christ, whilst simultaneously empowering those same people to be fully enveloped in the loving arms of mother church? Brock has offered us a ‘doxological approach’ in order to combine the best of both inclusivity and prophecy and to avoid the twin pitfalls of marginalization and romanticization.” A strikingly precise encapsulation of a theological proposal in which I am deeply invested.","PeriodicalId":38120,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Disability and Religion","volume":"75 1","pages":"225 - 228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Going Even Further with Autism: The Kenotic Foundations of Communication\",\"authors\":\"B. Brock\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23312521.2022.2051679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I am in Joanna Leidenhag’s debt for so clearly describing how my account of doxology asks a new question in order to advance current scholarly discussions about the contribution of people with disabilities to the life of the church: “How do we receive those who bear the label ‘disabled’ or ‘autistic,’ as a word of judgment from the Spirit calling the church into the likeness of Christ, whilst simultaneously empowering those same people to be fully enveloped in the loving arms of mother church? Brock has offered us a ‘doxological approach’ in order to combine the best of both inclusivity and prophecy and to avoid the twin pitfalls of marginalization and romanticization.” A strikingly precise encapsulation of a theological proposal in which I am deeply invested.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Disability and Religion\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"225 - 228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Disability and Religion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23312521.2022.2051679\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Disability and Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23312521.2022.2051679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我在乔安娜Leidenhag债务显然描述我的帐户的颂歌问一个新的问题,以推进当前的学术讨论的贡献残疾人教会的生活:“我们怎么得到那些熊标签“禁用”或“自闭症”,一个词的判断精神叫教会了我们内心对于基督的信仰,同时赋予这些人完全笼罩在母亲怀抱的教堂吗?布洛克为我们提供了一种‘神学方法’,以结合包容性和预言性的优点,避免边缘化和浪漫化的双重陷阱。”这是对我深深投入其中的神学建议的惊人精确的概括。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Going Even Further with Autism: The Kenotic Foundations of Communication
I am in Joanna Leidenhag’s debt for so clearly describing how my account of doxology asks a new question in order to advance current scholarly discussions about the contribution of people with disabilities to the life of the church: “How do we receive those who bear the label ‘disabled’ or ‘autistic,’ as a word of judgment from the Spirit calling the church into the likeness of Christ, whilst simultaneously empowering those same people to be fully enveloped in the loving arms of mother church? Brock has offered us a ‘doxological approach’ in order to combine the best of both inclusivity and prophecy and to avoid the twin pitfalls of marginalization and romanticization.” A strikingly precise encapsulation of a theological proposal in which I am deeply invested.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Disability and Religion
Journal of Disability and Religion Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信