适应性体育活动的N-Pact因子、复制、力量和定量研究季刊

Q2 Health Professions

Kinesiology Review Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI:10.1123/kr.2020-0067

Jeffrey Martin, Drew Martin

{"title":"适应性体育活动的N-Pact因子、复制、力量和定量研究季刊","authors":"Jeffrey Martin, Drew Martin","doi":"10.1123/kr.2020-0067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the current study, a 20-year span of 80 issues of articles (N = 196) in Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly (APAQ) were examined. The authors sought to determine whether quantitative research published in APAQ, based on sample size, was underpowered, leading to the potential for false-positive results and findings that may not be reproducible. The median sample size, also known as the N-Pact Factor (NF), for all quantitative research published in APAQ was coded for correlational-type, quasi-experimental, and experimental research. The overall median sample size over the 20-year period examined was as follows: correlational type, NF = 112; quasi-experimental, NF = 40; and experimental, NF = 48. Four 5-year blocks were also analyzed to show historical trends. As the authors show, these results suggest that much of the quantitative research published in APAQ over the last 20 years was underpowered to detect small to moderate population effect sizes.","PeriodicalId":37468,"journal":{"name":"Kinesiology Review","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The N-Pact Factor, Replication, Power, and Quantitative Research in Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey Martin, Drew Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/kr.2020-0067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the current study, a 20-year span of 80 issues of articles (N = 196) in Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly (APAQ) were examined. The authors sought to determine whether quantitative research published in APAQ, based on sample size, was underpowered, leading to the potential for false-positive results and findings that may not be reproducible. The median sample size, also known as the N-Pact Factor (NF), for all quantitative research published in APAQ was coded for correlational-type, quasi-experimental, and experimental research. The overall median sample size over the 20-year period examined was as follows: correlational type, NF = 112; quasi-experimental, NF = 40; and experimental, NF = 48. Four 5-year blocks were also analyzed to show historical trends. As the authors show, these results suggest that much of the quantitative research published in APAQ over the last 20 years was underpowered to detect small to moderate population effect sizes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kinesiology Review\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kinesiology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2020-0067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kinesiology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2020-0067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

在当前的研究中，对适应性体育活动季刊(APAQ) 20年跨度的80期文章(N = 196)进行了研究。作者试图确定发表在APAQ上的基于样本量的定量研究是否力度不足，导致假阳性结果的可能性和不可重复的发现。在APAQ上发表的所有定量研究的中位数样本量，也称为N-Pact因子(NF)，被编码为相关型、准实验型和实验型研究。20年期间的总体中位数样本量如下:相关型，NF = 112;准实验，NF = 40;实验，NF = 48。还分析了四个5年的区块，以显示历史趋势。正如作者所表明的那样，这些结果表明，过去20年在APAQ上发表的许多定量研究不足以检测到小到中等的群体效应。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The N-Pact Factor, Replication, Power, and Quantitative Research in Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly

In the current study, a 20-year span of 80 issues of articles (N = 196) in Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly (APAQ) were examined. The authors sought to determine whether quantitative research published in APAQ, based on sample size, was underpowered, leading to the potential for false-positive results and findings that may not be reproducible. The median sample size, also known as the N-Pact Factor (NF), for all quantitative research published in APAQ was coded for correlational-type, quasi-experimental, and experimental research. The overall median sample size over the 20-year period examined was as follows: correlational type, NF = 112; quasi-experimental, NF = 40; and experimental, NF = 48. Four 5-year blocks were also analyzed to show historical trends. As the authors show, these results suggest that much of the quantitative research published in APAQ over the last 20 years was underpowered to detect small to moderate population effect sizes.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Kinesiology Review Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Kinesiology Review (KR) is the official journal of the National Academy of Kinesiology and the American Kinesiology Association. KR provides a forum for discussion and analysis of kinesiology research and its applications. Although many journals publish reviews on select topics, KR stands alone in its focus on scholarly reviews from all subdisciplines of kinesiology. This rigorously peer-reviewed journal serves the interests of those in all areas of study related to kinesiology—sport and exercise psychology, motor behavior, exercise physiology, biomechanics, sports medicine, sport history, sport philosophy, sport sociology, physical education pedagogy, and sport management. The insightful review articles in KR address important issues and emerging research in all areas of kinesiology. KR also publishes theoretical papers, critical analyses of significant issues and scientific methods, and position papers pertinent to kinesiology. One issue each year contains papers based on scholarly presentations of the annual meeting of the National Academy of Kinesiology, which provides commentaries on timely issues in the field, and another issue contains papers reflecting the topic of the annual leadership workshop of the American Kinesiology Association. Articles featured in KR have touched on recovering from spinal cord injuries, the role of physical activity in successful aging, diversity in kinesiology, and the history of organized youth sport in the United States. Future articles will continue to explore new research in kinesiology and other topics of importance to the field. KR’s broad coverage makes it a perfect source of information for faculty, researchers, and professionals who want to stay up to date on emerging research across the subdisciplines, as well as students who are starting their exploration of this fascinating field of study.