检察官因贪污而被起诉,企图赔偿该州的财政损失

Iwan Kurniawan, Riki Afrizal
{"title":"检察官因贪污而被起诉,企图赔偿该州的财政损失","authors":"Iwan Kurniawan, Riki Afrizal","doi":"10.25077/NALREV.V.5.I.1.P.103-115.2021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stollen assets recovery is one of the main purpose of eradicating corruption policy in Indonesia. Private lawsuit is one of the mechanisms that can be used to achieve this purpose. This mechanism has been regulated in Law Number. 31 of 1999 as amended by Law Number. 20 of 2001 Concerning the Eradication of Crimes of Corruption. This article analyses the extent to which private lawsuits mechanism in that Law can normatively accommodate the efforts to recover state financial losses due to corruption and the problems faced by State Attorneys in implementing these rules. This study uses both normative and empirical legal research methods. Primary data in this research was carried out by purposive sampling method in several District Attorney offices in West Sumatra. From what has been done, it can be said that the rules regarding private lawsuits in Law no. 31 of 1999 and Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning The Eradication of Crime of Corruption has opened a fairly flexible space for state attorneys to submit private action to recover state financial losses. However, the space provided by these laws and regulations has not been fully utilized by the Attorney General's Office, especially the District Attorney's Office in West Sumatra. There are several problems, both juridical and non-juridical in nature, such as: the problem of proof in the civil case, the misunderstanding of the attorney officer about the rules of private lawsuits in that Law, the problem of tracking assets, and the problem concerning the benefits or profits. In fact, the profits obtained from this private lawsuit do not have a significant impact on efforts to recover state losses.","PeriodicalId":33148,"journal":{"name":"Nagari Law Review","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gugatan Keperdataan Oleh Jaksa Pengacara Negara Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Karena Korupsi\",\"authors\":\"Iwan Kurniawan, Riki Afrizal\",\"doi\":\"10.25077/NALREV.V.5.I.1.P.103-115.2021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Stollen assets recovery is one of the main purpose of eradicating corruption policy in Indonesia. Private lawsuit is one of the mechanisms that can be used to achieve this purpose. This mechanism has been regulated in Law Number. 31 of 1999 as amended by Law Number. 20 of 2001 Concerning the Eradication of Crimes of Corruption. This article analyses the extent to which private lawsuits mechanism in that Law can normatively accommodate the efforts to recover state financial losses due to corruption and the problems faced by State Attorneys in implementing these rules. This study uses both normative and empirical legal research methods. Primary data in this research was carried out by purposive sampling method in several District Attorney offices in West Sumatra. From what has been done, it can be said that the rules regarding private lawsuits in Law no. 31 of 1999 and Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning The Eradication of Crime of Corruption has opened a fairly flexible space for state attorneys to submit private action to recover state financial losses. However, the space provided by these laws and regulations has not been fully utilized by the Attorney General's Office, especially the District Attorney's Office in West Sumatra. There are several problems, both juridical and non-juridical in nature, such as: the problem of proof in the civil case, the misunderstanding of the attorney officer about the rules of private lawsuits in that Law, the problem of tracking assets, and the problem concerning the benefits or profits. In fact, the profits obtained from this private lawsuit do not have a significant impact on efforts to recover state losses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nagari Law Review\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nagari Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25077/NALREV.V.5.I.1.P.103-115.2021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nagari Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25077/NALREV.V.5.I.1.P.103-115.2021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

追回被盗资产是印尼根除腐败政策的主要目的之一。私诉是实现这一目的的机制之一。1999年第31号法律对这一机制进行了规定,并经2001年第20号法律对其进行了修正。本文分析了该法中的私人诉讼机制在多大程度上能够规范地适应因腐败而造成的国家财政损失的追回工作,以及州检察官在执行这些规则时面临的问题。本研究采用规范法和实证法相结合的研究方法。本研究的主要数据是在西苏门答腊省的几个地方检察官办公室采用有目的抽样方法进行的。从所做的工作来看,可以说《第2号法》中关于私人诉讼的规定。1999年第31号法和2001年关于根除腐败犯罪的第20号法为州检察官提出私人诉讼以追回国家财政损失开辟了相当灵活的空间。但是,总检察长办公室,特别是西苏门答腊地区检察官办公室没有充分利用这些法律和条例所提供的空间。民事诉讼中存在着若干法律和非法律性质的问题,如:民事诉讼中的举证问题、律师对《民法》私诉规则的误解问题、资产追踪问题、利益或利润问题等。事实上,从这起私人诉讼中获得的利润对恢复国家损失的努力没有重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gugatan Keperdataan Oleh Jaksa Pengacara Negara Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Karena Korupsi
Stollen assets recovery is one of the main purpose of eradicating corruption policy in Indonesia. Private lawsuit is one of the mechanisms that can be used to achieve this purpose. This mechanism has been regulated in Law Number. 31 of 1999 as amended by Law Number. 20 of 2001 Concerning the Eradication of Crimes of Corruption. This article analyses the extent to which private lawsuits mechanism in that Law can normatively accommodate the efforts to recover state financial losses due to corruption and the problems faced by State Attorneys in implementing these rules. This study uses both normative and empirical legal research methods. Primary data in this research was carried out by purposive sampling method in several District Attorney offices in West Sumatra. From what has been done, it can be said that the rules regarding private lawsuits in Law no. 31 of 1999 and Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning The Eradication of Crime of Corruption has opened a fairly flexible space for state attorneys to submit private action to recover state financial losses. However, the space provided by these laws and regulations has not been fully utilized by the Attorney General's Office, especially the District Attorney's Office in West Sumatra. There are several problems, both juridical and non-juridical in nature, such as: the problem of proof in the civil case, the misunderstanding of the attorney officer about the rules of private lawsuits in that Law, the problem of tracking assets, and the problem concerning the benefits or profits. In fact, the profits obtained from this private lawsuit do not have a significant impact on efforts to recover state losses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信