提高标准:法学院和法律机构引导无证学生的教育

R. Aldana, B. Lyon, K. McKanders
{"title":"提高标准:法学院和法律机构引导无证学生的教育","authors":"R. Aldana, B. Lyon, K. McKanders","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1988396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the adoption of best practices for the admission and graduation of undocumented students as lawyers and promoting their integration into the legal profession. Law schools are already both knowingly and unknowingly admitting and graduating undocumented students. It is our contention in this paper, after careful analysis, that no law precludes law schools from admitting undocumented students, offering them in-state tuition or other types of private and even public financial aid in states that permit it, or allowing them to participate fully in the law schools’ educational opportunities. We acknowledge that there are tensions around the decision to educate undocumented law students. Law schools should worry about the appropriateness of graduating lawyers with high debt burdens and no prospects for paid employment inside the United States. For some, the admission and graduation of undocumented law students may also raise other types of resource allocation or moral dilemmas, such as how and whether a person’s immigration status should bear upon determination of character and fitness of practice law. This piece aims to be precise and nuanced about the legal, practical, and moral challenges law schools face in enrolling undocumented students. The paper focuses on three main areas. First, the paper examines the application of the American Bar Association (“ABA”) 2011-2012 Standards and Rules of Procedure for Approval of Law Schools (the “Standards”) and American Association of Law Schools minimum requirements to the education of undocumented law students. The paper also considers state rules on bar admission and examines impediments in some states to sitting for the bar examination. Second, the paper outlines current laws governing financial aid for undocumented students and their eligibility to participate in educational experiential opportunities while in law school. This section also puts to rest the misperception that an educational institution may be held liable under the Immigration and Nationality Act’s harboring provisions for admitting undocumented student. Finally, the paper outlines best practices for guiding undocumented law students from admission through beginning their legal career.","PeriodicalId":80553,"journal":{"name":"Arizona State law journal","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Raising the Bar: Law Schools and Legal Institutions Leading to Educate Undocumented Students\",\"authors\":\"R. Aldana, B. Lyon, K. McKanders\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1988396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores the adoption of best practices for the admission and graduation of undocumented students as lawyers and promoting their integration into the legal profession. Law schools are already both knowingly and unknowingly admitting and graduating undocumented students. It is our contention in this paper, after careful analysis, that no law precludes law schools from admitting undocumented students, offering them in-state tuition or other types of private and even public financial aid in states that permit it, or allowing them to participate fully in the law schools’ educational opportunities. We acknowledge that there are tensions around the decision to educate undocumented law students. Law schools should worry about the appropriateness of graduating lawyers with high debt burdens and no prospects for paid employment inside the United States. For some, the admission and graduation of undocumented law students may also raise other types of resource allocation or moral dilemmas, such as how and whether a person’s immigration status should bear upon determination of character and fitness of practice law. This piece aims to be precise and nuanced about the legal, practical, and moral challenges law schools face in enrolling undocumented students. The paper focuses on three main areas. First, the paper examines the application of the American Bar Association (“ABA”) 2011-2012 Standards and Rules of Procedure for Approval of Law Schools (the “Standards”) and American Association of Law Schools minimum requirements to the education of undocumented law students. The paper also considers state rules on bar admission and examines impediments in some states to sitting for the bar examination. Second, the paper outlines current laws governing financial aid for undocumented students and their eligibility to participate in educational experiential opportunities while in law school. This section also puts to rest the misperception that an educational institution may be held liable under the Immigration and Nationality Act’s harboring provisions for admitting undocumented student. Finally, the paper outlines best practices for guiding undocumented law students from admission through beginning their legal career.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arizona State law journal\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arizona State law journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1988396\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arizona State law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1988396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文探讨了无证学生作为律师的录取和毕业的最佳实践,并促进他们融入法律专业。法学院已经在有意无意地招收和毕业无证学生。经过仔细分析,我们在本文中的论点是,没有法律禁止法学院招收无证学生,在允许的州向他们提供州内学费或其他类型的私人甚至公共财政援助,或者允许他们充分参与法学院的教育机会。我们承认,在教育无证法律学生的决定上存在紧张局势。法学院应该担心的是,毕业的律师背负着沉重的债务负担,在美国国内找不到有薪工作的前景,是否合适。对一些人来说,无证法律学生的录取和毕业也可能引发其他类型的资源分配或道德困境,例如,一个人的移民身份应如何以及是否应与确定品格和适合执业法律有关。这篇文章旨在准确而细致地描述法学院在招收无证学生时面临的法律、实践和道德挑战。本文主要关注三个方面。首先,本文考察了美国律师协会(“ABA”)2011-2012年法学院批准程序标准和规则(“标准”)和美国法学院协会最低要求在无证法律学生教育中的应用。本文还考虑了州对律师资格的规定,并考察了一些州参加律师资格考试的障碍。其次,本文概述了管理无证学生经济援助的现行法律,以及他们在法学院期间参加教育体验机会的资格。本节还消除了一种误解,即根据《移民和国籍法》的庇护条款,教育机构可能会因招收无证学生而承担责任。最后,本文概述了指导无证法律学生从入学到开始他们的法律职业生涯的最佳做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Raising the Bar: Law Schools and Legal Institutions Leading to Educate Undocumented Students
This paper explores the adoption of best practices for the admission and graduation of undocumented students as lawyers and promoting their integration into the legal profession. Law schools are already both knowingly and unknowingly admitting and graduating undocumented students. It is our contention in this paper, after careful analysis, that no law precludes law schools from admitting undocumented students, offering them in-state tuition or other types of private and even public financial aid in states that permit it, or allowing them to participate fully in the law schools’ educational opportunities. We acknowledge that there are tensions around the decision to educate undocumented law students. Law schools should worry about the appropriateness of graduating lawyers with high debt burdens and no prospects for paid employment inside the United States. For some, the admission and graduation of undocumented law students may also raise other types of resource allocation or moral dilemmas, such as how and whether a person’s immigration status should bear upon determination of character and fitness of practice law. This piece aims to be precise and nuanced about the legal, practical, and moral challenges law schools face in enrolling undocumented students. The paper focuses on three main areas. First, the paper examines the application of the American Bar Association (“ABA”) 2011-2012 Standards and Rules of Procedure for Approval of Law Schools (the “Standards”) and American Association of Law Schools minimum requirements to the education of undocumented law students. The paper also considers state rules on bar admission and examines impediments in some states to sitting for the bar examination. Second, the paper outlines current laws governing financial aid for undocumented students and their eligibility to participate in educational experiential opportunities while in law school. This section also puts to rest the misperception that an educational institution may be held liable under the Immigration and Nationality Act’s harboring provisions for admitting undocumented student. Finally, the paper outlines best practices for guiding undocumented law students from admission through beginning their legal career.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信