应急管理机构在尼日利亚东南地区农户自然灾害管理中的绩效评估

J. Obi, C. Ifejirika, K. Itam, A. Enete, J. Munonye, E. Osuji, D. Oyoboh, S. Jimmy, C. Egwu, C. Nwachukwu, A. Obetta, C. Nwofoke, N. Odoh
{"title":"应急管理机构在尼日利亚东南地区农户自然灾害管理中的绩效评估","authors":"J. Obi, C. Ifejirika, K. Itam, A. Enete, J. Munonye, E. Osuji, D. Oyoboh, S. Jimmy, C. Egwu, C. Nwachukwu, A. Obetta, C. Nwofoke, N. Odoh","doi":"10.14720/aas.2023.119.2.12480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An assessment of the performance of emergency management agency in mitigating natural hazards among farm households in Southeast Zone, Nigeria was studied. About 240 farm households who were administered questionnaire were chosen from the states’ flood- and erosion-prone regions using multi-stage sampling technique. The results indicate that the EmergencyManagement Based-Performance Index’s average level of national emergency management activities was 57.33. The total average ratings of the National Emergency Management Agency/State Emergency Management Agency performance indicators based on their usefulness as a measure of natural hazard were estimated as 47.8% which showed that the NEMA/SEMA key performance indicators’ degree of effectiveness in hazard management is deemed to be below average of the index. These key performance indicators (KPI) include; distribution of food, provision of seedlings, provision of agro-chemical, training of farmers on postharvest crop preservation, use of weather, rehabilitation of water resources, expansion of irrigation facilities, distribution of fingerlings, provision of household items. The highest weighted score assigned to the distribution of food was 2.89, indicating that it is 57.8% successin mitigating natural disasters, while the average weight score allocated to the distribution of seedlings was 2.62, indicating a 52.4% degree of efficacy. However, the study recommends that the funds allotted to NEMA/SEMA should be monitored to ensure it is utilized in achieving its stated aims and objectives.","PeriodicalId":6884,"journal":{"name":"Acta agriculturae Slovenica","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An assessment of the performance of emergency management agency in the natural hazards management among farm households in the southeast zone, Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"J. Obi, C. Ifejirika, K. Itam, A. Enete, J. Munonye, E. Osuji, D. Oyoboh, S. Jimmy, C. Egwu, C. Nwachukwu, A. Obetta, C. Nwofoke, N. Odoh\",\"doi\":\"10.14720/aas.2023.119.2.12480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An assessment of the performance of emergency management agency in mitigating natural hazards among farm households in Southeast Zone, Nigeria was studied. About 240 farm households who were administered questionnaire were chosen from the states’ flood- and erosion-prone regions using multi-stage sampling technique. The results indicate that the EmergencyManagement Based-Performance Index’s average level of national emergency management activities was 57.33. The total average ratings of the National Emergency Management Agency/State Emergency Management Agency performance indicators based on their usefulness as a measure of natural hazard were estimated as 47.8% which showed that the NEMA/SEMA key performance indicators’ degree of effectiveness in hazard management is deemed to be below average of the index. These key performance indicators (KPI) include; distribution of food, provision of seedlings, provision of agro-chemical, training of farmers on postharvest crop preservation, use of weather, rehabilitation of water resources, expansion of irrigation facilities, distribution of fingerlings, provision of household items. The highest weighted score assigned to the distribution of food was 2.89, indicating that it is 57.8% successin mitigating natural disasters, while the average weight score allocated to the distribution of seedlings was 2.62, indicating a 52.4% degree of efficacy. However, the study recommends that the funds allotted to NEMA/SEMA should be monitored to ensure it is utilized in achieving its stated aims and objectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta agriculturae Slovenica\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta agriculturae Slovenica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14720/aas.2023.119.2.12480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta agriculturae Slovenica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14720/aas.2023.119.2.12480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对应急管理机构在尼日利亚东南地区农户减轻自然灾害方面的绩效进行了评估。采用多阶段抽样技术,从各州的洪水和侵蚀易发地区选取了约240户农户进行问卷调查。结果表明,应急管理绩效指数的国家应急管理活动平均水平为57.33。国家紧急事务管理局/州紧急事务管理局绩效指标基于其作为自然灾害度量的有用性的总平均评级估计为47.8%,这表明NEMA/SEMA关键绩效指标在灾害管理中的有效性程度被认为低于指数的平均水平。这些关键绩效指标包括:分发粮食、提供秧苗、提供农用化学品、培训农民收获后保存作物、利用天气、恢复水资源、扩大灌溉设施、分发鱼种、提供家庭用品。分配粮食的加权得分最高,为2.89分,减灾成功率为57.8%;分配幼苗的加权得分平均为2.62分,减灾成功率为52.4%。但是,研究报告建议,应监测拨给国家环境监测和管理研究所的资金,以确保这些资金用于实现其既定的目的和目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An assessment of the performance of emergency management agency in the natural hazards management among farm households in the southeast zone, Nigeria
An assessment of the performance of emergency management agency in mitigating natural hazards among farm households in Southeast Zone, Nigeria was studied. About 240 farm households who were administered questionnaire were chosen from the states’ flood- and erosion-prone regions using multi-stage sampling technique. The results indicate that the EmergencyManagement Based-Performance Index’s average level of national emergency management activities was 57.33. The total average ratings of the National Emergency Management Agency/State Emergency Management Agency performance indicators based on their usefulness as a measure of natural hazard were estimated as 47.8% which showed that the NEMA/SEMA key performance indicators’ degree of effectiveness in hazard management is deemed to be below average of the index. These key performance indicators (KPI) include; distribution of food, provision of seedlings, provision of agro-chemical, training of farmers on postharvest crop preservation, use of weather, rehabilitation of water resources, expansion of irrigation facilities, distribution of fingerlings, provision of household items. The highest weighted score assigned to the distribution of food was 2.89, indicating that it is 57.8% successin mitigating natural disasters, while the average weight score allocated to the distribution of seedlings was 2.62, indicating a 52.4% degree of efficacy. However, the study recommends that the funds allotted to NEMA/SEMA should be monitored to ensure it is utilized in achieving its stated aims and objectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta agriculturae Slovenica
Acta agriculturae Slovenica Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Acta agriculturae Slovenica is a scientific journal published quarterly by the Agronomy, and the Zootechnical Departments of the Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia. Source of high quality research from the field of agronomy, zootechnics, applied biology and related fields from Slovenia and other countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信