科学传播的接管:科学是如何在德国日报上关于碳捕获和封存研究的公共话语中失去主导地位的

Q2 Social Sciences
S. Schneider
{"title":"科学传播的接管:科学是如何在德国日报上关于碳捕获和封存研究的公共话语中失去主导地位的","authors":"S. Schneider","doi":"10.5194/GC-2-69-2019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. CCS (carbon capture and storage) is an important issue within the context of\nclimate-change mitigation options and has played a major role in the agendas\nof scientists, researchers, and engineers. While media representations of CCS\nin Germany from 2004 to 2014 demonstrated the significant mediatization of\nthe topic, this cannot be ascribed to science. Instead, CCS media coverage in\nGermany has been dominated by other stakeholder groups. While CCS is linked\nto various industry sectors, such as cement and steel production, the German\ndebate has dominantly focussed on the coal and energy branches. This study\nlooks at the role of science and science public relations (PR) within the\nGerman public debate by analysing the media coverage of CCS in daily\nnewspapers from 2004 to 2014. If science wishes to remain proactive within\nscience communication, new approaches for future science PR have to be\ndeduced to strengthen, once again, the role of science communication. Among\nthese approaches, it is important to pursue a more differentiated\nunderstanding of target audiences and regional concerns. Science PR has to\naccept that science itself is no longer the only stakeholder and actor within\nscience communication.\n","PeriodicalId":52877,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience Communication","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The takeover of science communication: how science lost its leading role in the public discourse on carbon capture and storage research in daily newspapers in Germany\",\"authors\":\"S. Schneider\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/GC-2-69-2019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. CCS (carbon capture and storage) is an important issue within the context of\\nclimate-change mitigation options and has played a major role in the agendas\\nof scientists, researchers, and engineers. While media representations of CCS\\nin Germany from 2004 to 2014 demonstrated the significant mediatization of\\nthe topic, this cannot be ascribed to science. Instead, CCS media coverage in\\nGermany has been dominated by other stakeholder groups. While CCS is linked\\nto various industry sectors, such as cement and steel production, the German\\ndebate has dominantly focussed on the coal and energy branches. This study\\nlooks at the role of science and science public relations (PR) within the\\nGerman public debate by analysing the media coverage of CCS in daily\\nnewspapers from 2004 to 2014. If science wishes to remain proactive within\\nscience communication, new approaches for future science PR have to be\\ndeduced to strengthen, once again, the role of science communication. Among\\nthese approaches, it is important to pursue a more differentiated\\nunderstanding of target audiences and regional concerns. Science PR has to\\naccept that science itself is no longer the only stakeholder and actor within\\nscience communication.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":52877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoscience Communication\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoscience Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/GC-2-69-2019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/GC-2-69-2019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要CCS(碳捕获与封存)是减缓气候变化方案背景下的一个重要问题,在科学家、研究人员和工程师的议程中发挥了重要作用。虽然从2004年到2014年,德国媒体对ccn的报道显示了该话题的显著媒介化,但这不能归因于科学。相反,德国的CCS媒体报道一直由其他利益相关者团体主导。虽然CCS与水泥和钢铁生产等多个行业相关,但德国的辩论主要集中在煤炭和能源领域。本研究通过分析2004年至2014年德国日报对CCS的媒体报道,探讨了科学和科学公共关系(PR)在德国公共辩论中的作用。如果科学希望在科学传播中保持主动性,就必须推导出未来科学公关的新方法,以再次加强科学传播的作用。在这些方法中,重要的是追求对目标受众和区域关切的更有区别的理解。科学公关必须承认,科学本身不再是科学传播中唯一的利益相关者和行动者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The takeover of science communication: how science lost its leading role in the public discourse on carbon capture and storage research in daily newspapers in Germany
Abstract. CCS (carbon capture and storage) is an important issue within the context of climate-change mitigation options and has played a major role in the agendas of scientists, researchers, and engineers. While media representations of CCS in Germany from 2004 to 2014 demonstrated the significant mediatization of the topic, this cannot be ascribed to science. Instead, CCS media coverage in Germany has been dominated by other stakeholder groups. While CCS is linked to various industry sectors, such as cement and steel production, the German debate has dominantly focussed on the coal and energy branches. This study looks at the role of science and science public relations (PR) within the German public debate by analysing the media coverage of CCS in daily newspapers from 2004 to 2014. If science wishes to remain proactive within science communication, new approaches for future science PR have to be deduced to strengthen, once again, the role of science communication. Among these approaches, it is important to pursue a more differentiated understanding of target audiences and regional concerns. Science PR has to accept that science itself is no longer the only stakeholder and actor within science communication.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoscience Communication
Geoscience Communication Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信