离散裂缝中两相流相对渗透率预测

A. Al-Turki, Amell A. Al-Ghamdi, M. Maučec
{"title":"离散裂缝中两相流相对渗透率预测","authors":"A. Al-Turki, Amell A. Al-Ghamdi, M. Maučec","doi":"10.2523/IPTC-19557-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Considering carbonate oil reservoirs, a rock fracture is a planar-shaped void filled with oil, water, gas and/or rock fines. These fractures vary in scale forming connected and complex networks of fractures. They have an effect on deliverability of fluids depending on their geometrical complexity, extent, matrix-fracture interaction, wettability, and orientation. In fractured reservoir rocks, relative to the rock matrix, fractures form highly permeable flow pathways that dominate fluid flow and transport in the reservoir which might have favorable or non-favorable effects on hydrocarbon production. It is crucial to characterize the fluid flow in the fracture networks to examine the root-cause relationships, the impact on hydrocarbon recovery and quantify the efficiency of enhanced recovery mechanisms.\n This work describes the development of a machine learning model for history matching and predicting two-phase relative permeability. Capitalizing on the main principles of the 4th Industrial Revolution (IR 4.0), the development of this model was achieved by training machine learning (ML) algorithms and using advanced predictive data analytics on data collected from lab experiments as input. The model derived from the analysis describes two-phase flow of oil and water in a single discretized fracture taking into account fracture aperture, wall roughness, orientation and, flow rates and direction. It also accommodates fluids and fracture characteristics to match laboratory SCAL experimental of co-current oil and water flow in a mixed-wettability single fracture modeled as narrow gap in a Hele-Shaw cell.\n The experimental data exhibit variations in shape and end-points that mainly reflect the effects of fracture aperture, roughness, inclination, and hysteresis effects. This in turn demonstrate the effects of phase interference, saturation changes, and major forces acting on two-phase flow in fractures like capillary and viscous forces.\n The empirical relationship showed an acceptable match to the experimentally derived relative permeability in most of the cases as well as good predictive capabilities against the blind tests on other sets of experimental data and numerical simulation models. Having both fracture relative permeability data (describing the fluids flow) and detailed fracture characterization improves our understanding of the reservoir dynamics and fractured network impact on hydrocarbon recovery.","PeriodicalId":11267,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, March 28, 2019","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of Two-Phase Flow Relative Permeability in Discrete Fractures\",\"authors\":\"A. Al-Turki, Amell A. Al-Ghamdi, M. Maučec\",\"doi\":\"10.2523/IPTC-19557-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Considering carbonate oil reservoirs, a rock fracture is a planar-shaped void filled with oil, water, gas and/or rock fines. These fractures vary in scale forming connected and complex networks of fractures. They have an effect on deliverability of fluids depending on their geometrical complexity, extent, matrix-fracture interaction, wettability, and orientation. In fractured reservoir rocks, relative to the rock matrix, fractures form highly permeable flow pathways that dominate fluid flow and transport in the reservoir which might have favorable or non-favorable effects on hydrocarbon production. It is crucial to characterize the fluid flow in the fracture networks to examine the root-cause relationships, the impact on hydrocarbon recovery and quantify the efficiency of enhanced recovery mechanisms.\\n This work describes the development of a machine learning model for history matching and predicting two-phase relative permeability. Capitalizing on the main principles of the 4th Industrial Revolution (IR 4.0), the development of this model was achieved by training machine learning (ML) algorithms and using advanced predictive data analytics on data collected from lab experiments as input. The model derived from the analysis describes two-phase flow of oil and water in a single discretized fracture taking into account fracture aperture, wall roughness, orientation and, flow rates and direction. It also accommodates fluids and fracture characteristics to match laboratory SCAL experimental of co-current oil and water flow in a mixed-wettability single fracture modeled as narrow gap in a Hele-Shaw cell.\\n The experimental data exhibit variations in shape and end-points that mainly reflect the effects of fracture aperture, roughness, inclination, and hysteresis effects. This in turn demonstrate the effects of phase interference, saturation changes, and major forces acting on two-phase flow in fractures like capillary and viscous forces.\\n The empirical relationship showed an acceptable match to the experimentally derived relative permeability in most of the cases as well as good predictive capabilities against the blind tests on other sets of experimental data and numerical simulation models. Having both fracture relative permeability data (describing the fluids flow) and detailed fracture characterization improves our understanding of the reservoir dynamics and fractured network impact on hydrocarbon recovery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Thu, March 28, 2019\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Thu, March 28, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-19557-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, March 28, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-19557-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于碳酸盐岩油藏来说,岩石裂缝是一个充满油、水、气和/或岩石细粒的平面状空隙。这些裂缝规模不一,形成了连通的复杂裂缝网络。根据流体的几何复杂性、范围、基质-裂缝相互作用、润湿性和取向,它们会对流体的产能产生影响。在裂缝性储层岩石中,相对于岩石基质,裂缝形成了高渗透率的流动通道,控制着储层中流体的流动和输运,这可能对油气生产产生有利或不利的影响。对裂缝网络中的流体流动进行表征,以检查其根本原因关系、对油气采收率的影响,并量化提高采收率机制的效率,这一点至关重要。这项工作描述了用于历史匹配和预测两相相对渗透率的机器学习模型的开发。利用第四次工业革命(IR 4.0)的主要原则,该模型的开发是通过训练机器学习(ML)算法和使用先进的预测数据分析来实现的,这些数据分析是从实验室实验中收集的数据作为输入。该模型考虑了裂缝孔径、壁面粗糙度、方向、流量和方向等因素,描述了单条离散裂缝中油水两相流动。它还适应流体和裂缝特征,以匹配实验室SCAL实验,在混合润湿性单一裂缝中,油水共流模拟为Hele-Shaw单元中的窄间隙。实验数据表现出形状和端点的变化,主要反映了裂缝孔径、粗糙度、倾角和滞后效应的影响。这反过来又证明了相干涉、饱和度变化以及作用于裂缝中两相流的主要力(如毛细力和粘性力)的影响。在大多数情况下,经验关系与实验推导的相对渗透率具有可接受的匹配性,并且对其他实验数据集和数值模拟模型的盲测具有良好的预测能力。同时获得裂缝相对渗透率数据(描述流体流动)和详细的裂缝特征,有助于我们更好地了解储层动态和裂缝网络对油气采收率的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction of Two-Phase Flow Relative Permeability in Discrete Fractures
Considering carbonate oil reservoirs, a rock fracture is a planar-shaped void filled with oil, water, gas and/or rock fines. These fractures vary in scale forming connected and complex networks of fractures. They have an effect on deliverability of fluids depending on their geometrical complexity, extent, matrix-fracture interaction, wettability, and orientation. In fractured reservoir rocks, relative to the rock matrix, fractures form highly permeable flow pathways that dominate fluid flow and transport in the reservoir which might have favorable or non-favorable effects on hydrocarbon production. It is crucial to characterize the fluid flow in the fracture networks to examine the root-cause relationships, the impact on hydrocarbon recovery and quantify the efficiency of enhanced recovery mechanisms. This work describes the development of a machine learning model for history matching and predicting two-phase relative permeability. Capitalizing on the main principles of the 4th Industrial Revolution (IR 4.0), the development of this model was achieved by training machine learning (ML) algorithms and using advanced predictive data analytics on data collected from lab experiments as input. The model derived from the analysis describes two-phase flow of oil and water in a single discretized fracture taking into account fracture aperture, wall roughness, orientation and, flow rates and direction. It also accommodates fluids and fracture characteristics to match laboratory SCAL experimental of co-current oil and water flow in a mixed-wettability single fracture modeled as narrow gap in a Hele-Shaw cell. The experimental data exhibit variations in shape and end-points that mainly reflect the effects of fracture aperture, roughness, inclination, and hysteresis effects. This in turn demonstrate the effects of phase interference, saturation changes, and major forces acting on two-phase flow in fractures like capillary and viscous forces. The empirical relationship showed an acceptable match to the experimentally derived relative permeability in most of the cases as well as good predictive capabilities against the blind tests on other sets of experimental data and numerical simulation models. Having both fracture relative permeability data (describing the fluids flow) and detailed fracture characterization improves our understanding of the reservoir dynamics and fractured network impact on hydrocarbon recovery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信