宪法法院的超请求权:潘卡西拉司法中的经济权利保护形式

Q3 Social Sciences
Rofi Wahanisa
{"title":"宪法法院的超请求权:潘卡西拉司法中的经济权利保护形式","authors":"Rofi Wahanisa","doi":"10.15294/jils.v5i1.35965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social justice concept has been clearly emphasized at Pancasila (the five fundamental values of Indonesia) as one of common values of Indonesia society. Pancasila also recognized as the philosophical grondslag which makes Pancasila as a reference of all Indonesian citizens and State Action, including in governance. The concept of social justice in Pancasila implies that any natural resource management that has the potential to prosper and affect the Indonesian people as a whole must be controlled by the State as well as used for the greatest prosperity of the people. This paper is intended to analyze, describe, and examine the Constitutional Court Decision concerning to social justice especially in terms of economic rights. This paper discusses various decisions of the Constitutional Court that are ultra petita. This paper illuminated and highlighted that in two Constitutional Court Decisions on Water Resources and the Decision on the Electricity Law and the Water Resources Law of the Constitutional Court in its decision to make an ultra petita decision by canceling the entire two laws, because that the article being tested is the heart of the law, thus seriously affecting the implementation of other articles in the law. Therefore, with the ultra petita decision, in the future, the Constitutional Court is expected to be more progressive and responsive in seeing the problems that occur, especially related to the basic economic needs of the Indonesian people. Because the Constitutional Court is the guardian of the constitution whose main function is to maintain Indonesia's highest legal order (constitution).","PeriodicalId":32877,"journal":{"name":"JILS Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Constitutional Court Ultra Petita as a Protection Form of Economic Rights in Pancasila Justice\",\"authors\":\"Rofi Wahanisa\",\"doi\":\"10.15294/jils.v5i1.35965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social justice concept has been clearly emphasized at Pancasila (the five fundamental values of Indonesia) as one of common values of Indonesia society. Pancasila also recognized as the philosophical grondslag which makes Pancasila as a reference of all Indonesian citizens and State Action, including in governance. The concept of social justice in Pancasila implies that any natural resource management that has the potential to prosper and affect the Indonesian people as a whole must be controlled by the State as well as used for the greatest prosperity of the people. This paper is intended to analyze, describe, and examine the Constitutional Court Decision concerning to social justice especially in terms of economic rights. This paper discusses various decisions of the Constitutional Court that are ultra petita. This paper illuminated and highlighted that in two Constitutional Court Decisions on Water Resources and the Decision on the Electricity Law and the Water Resources Law of the Constitutional Court in its decision to make an ultra petita decision by canceling the entire two laws, because that the article being tested is the heart of the law, thus seriously affecting the implementation of other articles in the law. Therefore, with the ultra petita decision, in the future, the Constitutional Court is expected to be more progressive and responsive in seeing the problems that occur, especially related to the basic economic needs of the Indonesian people. Because the Constitutional Court is the guardian of the constitution whose main function is to maintain Indonesia's highest legal order (constitution).\",\"PeriodicalId\":32877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JILS Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JILS Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v5i1.35965\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JILS Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v5i1.35965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

潘卡西拉(印度尼西亚的五项基本价值观)明确强调社会正义概念是印度尼西亚社会的共同价值观之一。潘卡西拉也被认为是哲学的基石,它使潘卡西拉成为所有印度尼西亚公民和国家行动的参考,包括治理。潘卡西拉的社会正义概念意味着,任何有可能繁荣和影响整个印度尼西亚人民的自然资源管理都必须由国家控制,并用于人民的最大繁荣。本文旨在分析、描述和审查宪法法院关于社会正义的判决,特别是在经济权利方面。本文讨论了宪法法院的各种越权判决。本文阐述并强调了宪法法院在《水利法》和《电力法》和《水利法》两项宪法裁判所的判决中,由于被检验的条款是法律的核心,从而严重影响了法律中其他条款的实施,因此宪法法院在其判决中做出了撤销全部两部法律的越权决定。因此,有了这一“超小权”的决定,预计宪法法院今后在看到发生的问题,特别是与印度尼西亚人民的基本经济需要有关的问题时,将更加进步和反应迅速。因为宪法法院是宪法的守护者,其主要职能是维护印尼最高的法律秩序(宪法)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Constitutional Court Ultra Petita as a Protection Form of Economic Rights in Pancasila Justice
Social justice concept has been clearly emphasized at Pancasila (the five fundamental values of Indonesia) as one of common values of Indonesia society. Pancasila also recognized as the philosophical grondslag which makes Pancasila as a reference of all Indonesian citizens and State Action, including in governance. The concept of social justice in Pancasila implies that any natural resource management that has the potential to prosper and affect the Indonesian people as a whole must be controlled by the State as well as used for the greatest prosperity of the people. This paper is intended to analyze, describe, and examine the Constitutional Court Decision concerning to social justice especially in terms of economic rights. This paper discusses various decisions of the Constitutional Court that are ultra petita. This paper illuminated and highlighted that in two Constitutional Court Decisions on Water Resources and the Decision on the Electricity Law and the Water Resources Law of the Constitutional Court in its decision to make an ultra petita decision by canceling the entire two laws, because that the article being tested is the heart of the law, thus seriously affecting the implementation of other articles in the law. Therefore, with the ultra petita decision, in the future, the Constitutional Court is expected to be more progressive and responsive in seeing the problems that occur, especially related to the basic economic needs of the Indonesian people. Because the Constitutional Court is the guardian of the constitution whose main function is to maintain Indonesia's highest legal order (constitution).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信