Frmesk Nawzad Hawez, Aryana Khales Jawad, Mahabad Ali Sabir
{"title":"有剖宫产史妇女术前与术中子宫下段厚度的超声评估","authors":"Frmesk Nawzad Hawez, Aryana Khales Jawad, Mahabad Ali Sabir","doi":"10.22317/imj.v6i1.1163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives; In this study we compared transabdominal ultrasound to transvaginal ultrasound to determine which one of them is most accurate in measuring the LUS.\nMethods; a prospective observational study on 100 pregnant at term women with history of previous one CS visited Maternity Teaching Hospital between period Jan 2020 to Sep 2020.\nResults; of total 100 women ( age range 20-42 years), more than half were primiparous and majority were with no history of miscarriage, mean LUS was 4 mm with standard deviation 1.09 in abdominal ultra sound 3.4 with standard deviation 1.14 in transvaginal and 3.45mm with standard deviation 1.2 in intraoperative before delivering head of the baby (p < 0.001).\nConclusion; Trans vaginal ultrasound is more accurate than transabdominal ultrasound in measuring lower uterine segment.","PeriodicalId":32555,"journal":{"name":"Iraq Medical Journal","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment thickness preoperative vs. intraoperative assessment in women with previous cesarean\",\"authors\":\"Frmesk Nawzad Hawez, Aryana Khales Jawad, Mahabad Ali Sabir\",\"doi\":\"10.22317/imj.v6i1.1163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives; In this study we compared transabdominal ultrasound to transvaginal ultrasound to determine which one of them is most accurate in measuring the LUS.\\nMethods; a prospective observational study on 100 pregnant at term women with history of previous one CS visited Maternity Teaching Hospital between period Jan 2020 to Sep 2020.\\nResults; of total 100 women ( age range 20-42 years), more than half were primiparous and majority were with no history of miscarriage, mean LUS was 4 mm with standard deviation 1.09 in abdominal ultra sound 3.4 with standard deviation 1.14 in transvaginal and 3.45mm with standard deviation 1.2 in intraoperative before delivering head of the baby (p < 0.001).\\nConclusion; Trans vaginal ultrasound is more accurate than transabdominal ultrasound in measuring lower uterine segment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iraq Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iraq Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22317/imj.v6i1.1163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iraq Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22317/imj.v6i1.1163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment thickness preoperative vs. intraoperative assessment in women with previous cesarean
Objectives; In this study we compared transabdominal ultrasound to transvaginal ultrasound to determine which one of them is most accurate in measuring the LUS.
Methods; a prospective observational study on 100 pregnant at term women with history of previous one CS visited Maternity Teaching Hospital between period Jan 2020 to Sep 2020.
Results; of total 100 women ( age range 20-42 years), more than half were primiparous and majority were with no history of miscarriage, mean LUS was 4 mm with standard deviation 1.09 in abdominal ultra sound 3.4 with standard deviation 1.14 in transvaginal and 3.45mm with standard deviation 1.2 in intraoperative before delivering head of the baby (p < 0.001).
Conclusion; Trans vaginal ultrasound is more accurate than transabdominal ultrasound in measuring lower uterine segment.