{"title":"MATERIALISE THIRDSPACE THROUGH SOCIO-SPATIAL INTEGRATION (Cases of Study: Thamrin 10, Jalan H. Agus Salim, Jalan Percetakan Negara, and Jalan Kramat Raya)","authors":"Y. B. Dwisusanto, Ruth Dea Juwita","doi":"10.9744/dimensi.49.2.105-116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urban informality is a phenomenon of everyday life in Jakarta but has not been extensively discussed, especially in spatial design practice. Previous study shows that informal space in the city is shaped by economic activities and urban opportunities heavily influence the flow of urbanisation in Indonesia. The study aims to examine the materialisation of Thirdspace through the forms of socio-spatial integration using Henri Lefebvre’s Production of Space (1991) and Edward Soja’s Thirdspace (2010). The use of theory connects the case study with other bodies of work in architecture that are looking to develop understandings of how spatial, social, and other urban contexts might be challenged and intertwined in urban informality. Using their respective body of work, the study is conducted in the four selected objects of study: Thamrin 10, Jalan H. Agus Salim, Jalan Percetakan Negara, and Jalan Kramat Raya. The findings reveal that the concrete abstraction of Thirdspace emerges in everyday life through urban informality, materialised by informal actors. The materialisation of Thirdspace is possible due to (1) participation of informal actors, (2) space occupied by informal actors, and (3) activities conducted by informal actors. As abstraction will become true in practice, socio-spatial integration of urban informality is an abstraction that becomes true through social and spatial practice.","PeriodicalId":30518,"journal":{"name":"Dimensi Journal of Architecture and Built Environment","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dimensi Journal of Architecture and Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.49.2.105-116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
城市非正式性是雅加达日常生活中的一种现象,但尚未得到广泛讨论,尤其是在空间设计实践中。先前的研究表明,城市中的非正式空间是由经济活动塑造的,城市机会严重影响了印度尼西亚的城市化进程。本研究旨在利用亨利·列斐伏尔的《空间的生产》(1991)和爱德华·索亚的《第三空间》(2010),通过社会空间整合的形式来考察第三空间的物质化。理论的使用将案例研究与建筑中的其他工作机构联系起来,这些机构正在寻求发展对空间,社会和其他城市环境如何在城市非正式性中受到挑战和交织的理解。利用他们各自的工作,研究在四个选定的研究对象中进行:Thamrin 10, Jalan H. Agus Salim, Jalan Percetakan Negara和Jalan Kramat Raya。研究结果表明,第三空间的具体抽象通过城市非正式性出现在日常生活中,并由非正式行为者具体化。第三空间的物质化是可能的,因为(1)非正式行动者的参与,(2)非正式行动者占据的空间,(3)非正式行动者进行的活动。由于抽象将在实践中成为现实,城市非正式性的社会空间整合是一种通过社会和空间实践成为现实的抽象。
MATERIALISE THIRDSPACE THROUGH SOCIO-SPATIAL INTEGRATION (Cases of Study: Thamrin 10, Jalan H. Agus Salim, Jalan Percetakan Negara, and Jalan Kramat Raya)
Urban informality is a phenomenon of everyday life in Jakarta but has not been extensively discussed, especially in spatial design practice. Previous study shows that informal space in the city is shaped by economic activities and urban opportunities heavily influence the flow of urbanisation in Indonesia. The study aims to examine the materialisation of Thirdspace through the forms of socio-spatial integration using Henri Lefebvre’s Production of Space (1991) and Edward Soja’s Thirdspace (2010). The use of theory connects the case study with other bodies of work in architecture that are looking to develop understandings of how spatial, social, and other urban contexts might be challenged and intertwined in urban informality. Using their respective body of work, the study is conducted in the four selected objects of study: Thamrin 10, Jalan H. Agus Salim, Jalan Percetakan Negara, and Jalan Kramat Raya. The findings reveal that the concrete abstraction of Thirdspace emerges in everyday life through urban informality, materialised by informal actors. The materialisation of Thirdspace is possible due to (1) participation of informal actors, (2) space occupied by informal actors, and (3) activities conducted by informal actors. As abstraction will become true in practice, socio-spatial integration of urban informality is an abstraction that becomes true through social and spatial practice.