COVID-19大流行期间澳大利亚和加拿大大学的控制和不安全感

IF 0.4 4区 管理学 Q4 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
D. Peetz, Sean O'Brady, Johanna Weststar, Amanda Coles, M. Baird, R. Cooper, S. Charlesworth, A. Pyman, Susan Ressia, G. Strachan, Carolyn Troup
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间澳大利亚和加拿大大学的控制和不安全感","authors":"D. Peetz, Sean O'Brady, Johanna Weststar, Amanda Coles, M. Baird, R. Cooper, S. Charlesworth, A. Pyman, Susan Ressia, G. Strachan, Carolyn Troup","doi":"10.7202/1091588ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines how the COVID-19 pandemic and ensuing university management control strategies have influenced higher education workers’ job security, stress and happiness. The primary quantitative and qualitative data are drawn from a survey of fourteen universities across Australia and Canada, supplemented by secondary research. The analysis examines institutional and worker responses to the pandemic, and resulting conflict over financial control at the macro (sector), meso (university) and micro (individual) levels.\n At the macro level, university responses were shaped by public policy decisions at both national and subnational layers of the state, and the higher education sector in both countries had a distinctly neoliberal form. However, Australian universities were exposed to greater financial pressure to cut job positions, and Australian university management might have been more inclined to do so than Canadian universities overall. \n Different institutional support for unionism at the macro level influenced how university staff were affected at the meso and micro levels. Restructuring at the universities across both countries negatively impacted job security and career prospects, in turn leading to reduced job satisfaction and increased stress. Although working from home was novel and liberating for many professional staff, it was a negative experience for many academic staff.\n Our analysis demonstrates that the experiences of university staff were influenced by more than the work arrangements implemented by universities during the COVID-19 pandemic. The approaches of universities to job protection, restructuring and engagement with staff through unions appeared to influence staff satisfaction, stress and happiness.\n Our findings extend the literature that documents how university staff routinely challenge neoliberalization processes in a variety of individual and collective actions, particularly in times of crisis. We argue that theorization of struggles over control of labour should be extended to account for struggles over control of finance.\n \n Abstract\n \n We studied 14 universities across Canada and Australia to examine how the COVID-19 crisis, mediated through management strategies and conflict over financial control in higher education, influenced workers’ job security and affective outcomes like stress and happiness. The countries differed in their institutional frameworks, their union density, their embeddedness in neoliberalism and their negotiation patterns. Management strategies also differed between universities. Employee outcomes were influenced by differences in union involvement. Labour cost reductions negotiated with unions could improve financial outcomes, but, even in a crisis, management might not be willing to forego absolute control over finance, and it was not the depth of the crisis that shaped management decisions.","PeriodicalId":45927,"journal":{"name":"Relations Industrielles-Industrial Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Control and Insecurity in Australian and Canadian Universities during the COVID-19 Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"D. Peetz, Sean O'Brady, Johanna Weststar, Amanda Coles, M. Baird, R. Cooper, S. Charlesworth, A. Pyman, Susan Ressia, G. Strachan, Carolyn Troup\",\"doi\":\"10.7202/1091588ar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines how the COVID-19 pandemic and ensuing university management control strategies have influenced higher education workers’ job security, stress and happiness. The primary quantitative and qualitative data are drawn from a survey of fourteen universities across Australia and Canada, supplemented by secondary research. The analysis examines institutional and worker responses to the pandemic, and resulting conflict over financial control at the macro (sector), meso (university) and micro (individual) levels.\\n At the macro level, university responses were shaped by public policy decisions at both national and subnational layers of the state, and the higher education sector in both countries had a distinctly neoliberal form. However, Australian universities were exposed to greater financial pressure to cut job positions, and Australian university management might have been more inclined to do so than Canadian universities overall. \\n Different institutional support for unionism at the macro level influenced how university staff were affected at the meso and micro levels. Restructuring at the universities across both countries negatively impacted job security and career prospects, in turn leading to reduced job satisfaction and increased stress. Although working from home was novel and liberating for many professional staff, it was a negative experience for many academic staff.\\n Our analysis demonstrates that the experiences of university staff were influenced by more than the work arrangements implemented by universities during the COVID-19 pandemic. The approaches of universities to job protection, restructuring and engagement with staff through unions appeared to influence staff satisfaction, stress and happiness.\\n Our findings extend the literature that documents how university staff routinely challenge neoliberalization processes in a variety of individual and collective actions, particularly in times of crisis. We argue that theorization of struggles over control of labour should be extended to account for struggles over control of finance.\\n \\n Abstract\\n \\n We studied 14 universities across Canada and Australia to examine how the COVID-19 crisis, mediated through management strategies and conflict over financial control in higher education, influenced workers’ job security and affective outcomes like stress and happiness. The countries differed in their institutional frameworks, their union density, their embeddedness in neoliberalism and their negotiation patterns. Management strategies also differed between universities. Employee outcomes were influenced by differences in union involvement. Labour cost reductions negotiated with unions could improve financial outcomes, but, even in a crisis, management might not be willing to forego absolute control over finance, and it was not the depth of the crisis that shaped management decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Relations Industrielles-Industrial Relations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Relations Industrielles-Industrial Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7202/1091588ar\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Relations Industrielles-Industrial Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1091588ar","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究探讨了新冠肺炎疫情和随后的大学管理控制策略如何影响高等教育工作者的工作保障、压力和幸福感。主要的定量和定性数据来自对澳大利亚和加拿大的14所大学的调查,辅以次级研究。该分析审查了机构和工作人员对大流行的反应,以及由此产生的宏观(部门)、中体(大学)和微观(个人)层面的财务控制冲突。在宏观层面上,大学的反应受到国家和地方各级公共政策决定的影响,两国的高等教育部门都有明显的新自由主义形式。然而,澳大利亚大学面临着更大的财政压力,不得不裁员,而且澳大利亚大学的管理层可能比加拿大大学总体上更倾向于这样做。宏观层面对工会主义的不同制度支持影响了中观和微观层面对大学员工的影响。两国大学的重组对工作保障和职业前景产生了负面影响,进而导致工作满意度降低,压力增加。尽管对许多专业人员来说,在家工作是一种新奇和解放,但对许多学术人员来说,这是一种消极的经历。我们的分析表明,在COVID-19大流行期间,大学工作人员的经历不仅仅受到大学实施的工作安排的影响。大学的工作保护、重组和通过工会与员工接触的方法似乎影响了员工的满意度、压力和幸福感。我们的研究结果扩展了文献,这些文献记录了大学工作人员如何在各种个人和集体行动中挑战新自由主义化进程,特别是在危机时期。我们认为,应该将控制劳工的斗争理论化,以解释控制金融的斗争。我们研究了加拿大和澳大利亚的14所大学,以研究COVID-19危机如何通过管理策略和高等教育财务控制冲突来调解,影响工人的工作保障以及压力和幸福感等情感结果。这些国家在制度框架、联盟密度、对新自由主义的信奉程度和谈判模式等方面存在差异。各大学的管理策略也各不相同。工会参与程度的差异会影响员工的工作结果。与工会谈判降低劳动力成本可以改善财务结果,但即使在危机中,管理层也可能不愿意放弃对财务的绝对控制,而且影响管理层决策的不是危机的深度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Control and Insecurity in Australian and Canadian Universities during the COVID-19 Pandemic
This study examines how the COVID-19 pandemic and ensuing university management control strategies have influenced higher education workers’ job security, stress and happiness. The primary quantitative and qualitative data are drawn from a survey of fourteen universities across Australia and Canada, supplemented by secondary research. The analysis examines institutional and worker responses to the pandemic, and resulting conflict over financial control at the macro (sector), meso (university) and micro (individual) levels. At the macro level, university responses were shaped by public policy decisions at both national and subnational layers of the state, and the higher education sector in both countries had a distinctly neoliberal form. However, Australian universities were exposed to greater financial pressure to cut job positions, and Australian university management might have been more inclined to do so than Canadian universities overall. Different institutional support for unionism at the macro level influenced how university staff were affected at the meso and micro levels. Restructuring at the universities across both countries negatively impacted job security and career prospects, in turn leading to reduced job satisfaction and increased stress. Although working from home was novel and liberating for many professional staff, it was a negative experience for many academic staff. Our analysis demonstrates that the experiences of university staff were influenced by more than the work arrangements implemented by universities during the COVID-19 pandemic. The approaches of universities to job protection, restructuring and engagement with staff through unions appeared to influence staff satisfaction, stress and happiness. Our findings extend the literature that documents how university staff routinely challenge neoliberalization processes in a variety of individual and collective actions, particularly in times of crisis. We argue that theorization of struggles over control of labour should be extended to account for struggles over control of finance. Abstract We studied 14 universities across Canada and Australia to examine how the COVID-19 crisis, mediated through management strategies and conflict over financial control in higher education, influenced workers’ job security and affective outcomes like stress and happiness. The countries differed in their institutional frameworks, their union density, their embeddedness in neoliberalism and their negotiation patterns. Management strategies also differed between universities. Employee outcomes were influenced by differences in union involvement. Labour cost reductions negotiated with unions could improve financial outcomes, but, even in a crisis, management might not be willing to forego absolute control over finance, and it was not the depth of the crisis that shaped management decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Relations Industrielles-Industrial Relations
Relations Industrielles-Industrial Relations INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信