在赞比亚开展以性传播感染和艾滋病毒/艾滋病护理为重点的传统和生物医学保健提供者参与的建立对话试点干预

Berthollet Bwira Kaboru, P. Ndubani, T. Falkenberg, A. Pharris, M. Muchimba, K. Solo, B. Höjer, E. Faxelid
{"title":"在赞比亚开展以性传播感染和艾滋病毒/艾滋病护理为重点的传统和生物医学保健提供者参与的建立对话试点干预","authors":"Berthollet Bwira Kaboru, P. Ndubani, T. Falkenberg, A. Pharris, M. Muchimba, K. Solo, B. Höjer, E. Faxelid","doi":"10.1177/1533210108316145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collaboration between traditional and biomedically trained health workers is regarded as key in HIV/AIDS control. However, few studies have focused on exploring ways of enhancing this collaboration. Using a pre- and postintervention questionnaire, the authors assessed changes in attitudes to and practices of collaboration among 19 biomedical and 28 traditional health care providers following a 12-month dialogue-building intervention in Ndola, Zambia. The intervention consisted of peer group discussions, interactive group discussions, training sessions, and peer-influenced networking. The results show that although both groups of providers had fairly positive attitudes toward each other before the intervention, further improvements in attitudes were observed after the intervention. Referrals between the two sectors and cross visits increased. However, some attitudes to collaboration became more negative and cautious after the intervention. Dialogue-building interventions involving traditional and biomedical providers are not only feasible but also complex. Intersectoral collaboration needs time and coordination between all relevant actors in the community.","PeriodicalId":10611,"journal":{"name":"Complementary Health Practice Review","volume":"83 1","pages":"110 - 126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Dialogue-Building Pilot Intervention Involving Traditional and Biomedical Health Providers Focusing on STIs and HIV/AIDS Care in Zambia\",\"authors\":\"Berthollet Bwira Kaboru, P. Ndubani, T. Falkenberg, A. Pharris, M. Muchimba, K. Solo, B. Höjer, E. Faxelid\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1533210108316145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Collaboration between traditional and biomedically trained health workers is regarded as key in HIV/AIDS control. However, few studies have focused on exploring ways of enhancing this collaboration. Using a pre- and postintervention questionnaire, the authors assessed changes in attitudes to and practices of collaboration among 19 biomedical and 28 traditional health care providers following a 12-month dialogue-building intervention in Ndola, Zambia. The intervention consisted of peer group discussions, interactive group discussions, training sessions, and peer-influenced networking. The results show that although both groups of providers had fairly positive attitudes toward each other before the intervention, further improvements in attitudes were observed after the intervention. Referrals between the two sectors and cross visits increased. However, some attitudes to collaboration became more negative and cautious after the intervention. Dialogue-building interventions involving traditional and biomedical providers are not only feasible but also complex. Intersectoral collaboration needs time and coordination between all relevant actors in the community.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Complementary Health Practice Review\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"110 - 126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Complementary Health Practice Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1533210108316145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary Health Practice Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1533210108316145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

传统卫生工作者和受过生物医学训练的卫生工作者之间的合作被认为是控制艾滋病毒/艾滋病的关键。然而,很少有研究集中于探索如何加强这种合作。作者使用干预前和干预后问卷,评估了在赞比亚恩多拉进行为期12个月的对话建设干预后,19个生物医学提供者和28个传统卫生保健提供者对合作的态度和做法的变化。干预包括同伴小组讨论、互动式小组讨论、培训课程和同伴影响网络。结果表明,虽然两组提供者在干预前对彼此都有相当积极的态度,但干预后态度进一步改善。两个界别之间的转介及交叉探访有所增加。然而,在干预后,一些人对合作的态度变得更加消极和谨慎。涉及传统和生物医学提供者的对话建设干预措施不仅可行,而且很复杂。部门间合作需要时间,也需要社会中所有相关行动者之间的协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Dialogue-Building Pilot Intervention Involving Traditional and Biomedical Health Providers Focusing on STIs and HIV/AIDS Care in Zambia
Collaboration between traditional and biomedically trained health workers is regarded as key in HIV/AIDS control. However, few studies have focused on exploring ways of enhancing this collaboration. Using a pre- and postintervention questionnaire, the authors assessed changes in attitudes to and practices of collaboration among 19 biomedical and 28 traditional health care providers following a 12-month dialogue-building intervention in Ndola, Zambia. The intervention consisted of peer group discussions, interactive group discussions, training sessions, and peer-influenced networking. The results show that although both groups of providers had fairly positive attitudes toward each other before the intervention, further improvements in attitudes were observed after the intervention. Referrals between the two sectors and cross visits increased. However, some attitudes to collaboration became more negative and cautious after the intervention. Dialogue-building interventions involving traditional and biomedical providers are not only feasible but also complex. Intersectoral collaboration needs time and coordination between all relevant actors in the community.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信