关键患者体验驱动导致示范性整体供应商绩效评级在门诊环境

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Zahi R. Jurdi, Joseph F. Crosby
{"title":"关键患者体验驱动导致示范性整体供应商绩效评级在门诊环境","authors":"Zahi R. Jurdi, Joseph F. Crosby","doi":"10.1097/JAC.0000000000000417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study highlights the key drivers that form particular patient impressions resulting in exemplary overall provider performance ratings across service lines in the ambulatory environment. Two national samples of CG-CAHPS data were analyzed. Results indicate variance of impact among all CG-CAHPS questions on “top-box” scores for overall rating of provider among specialties. Interestingly, the same 5 explanatory variables—provider listened carefully, provider spent enough time, provider showed respect, provider knew important information about medical history, and provider explained things clearly—had the greatest explanatory power across the primary and specialty care samples when analyzed via multiple logistic regression analysis.","PeriodicalId":46654,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT","volume":"34 1","pages":"182 - 190"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Key Patient Experience Drivers That Result in Exemplary Overall Provider Performance Ratings in the Ambulatory Environment\",\"authors\":\"Zahi R. Jurdi, Joseph F. Crosby\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JAC.0000000000000417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study highlights the key drivers that form particular patient impressions resulting in exemplary overall provider performance ratings across service lines in the ambulatory environment. Two national samples of CG-CAHPS data were analyzed. Results indicate variance of impact among all CG-CAHPS questions on “top-box” scores for overall rating of provider among specialties. Interestingly, the same 5 explanatory variables—provider listened carefully, provider spent enough time, provider showed respect, provider knew important information about medical history, and provider explained things clearly—had the greatest explanatory power across the primary and specialty care samples when analyzed via multiple logistic regression analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"182 - 190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAC.0000000000000417\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAC.0000000000000417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究强调了形成特定患者印象的关键驱动因素,从而在门诊环境中跨服务线产生示范性的整体提供者绩效评级。分析了两个国家的CG-CAHPS数据样本。结果表明,所有CG-CAHPS问题对专业间提供者总体评级的“顶盒”得分的影响存在差异。有趣的是,当通过多重逻辑回归分析时,同样的5个解释变量——提供者仔细倾听,提供者花足够的时间,提供者表现出尊重,提供者了解病史的重要信息,提供者清楚地解释事情——在初级和专科护理样本中具有最大的解释力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Key Patient Experience Drivers That Result in Exemplary Overall Provider Performance Ratings in the Ambulatory Environment
This study highlights the key drivers that form particular patient impressions resulting in exemplary overall provider performance ratings across service lines in the ambulatory environment. Two national samples of CG-CAHPS data were analyzed. Results indicate variance of impact among all CG-CAHPS questions on “top-box” scores for overall rating of provider among specialties. Interestingly, the same 5 explanatory variables—provider listened carefully, provider spent enough time, provider showed respect, provider knew important information about medical history, and provider explained things clearly—had the greatest explanatory power across the primary and specialty care samples when analyzed via multiple logistic regression analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT
JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management is a PEER-REVIEWED journal that provides timely, applied information on the most important developments and issues in ambulatory care management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信