废水与生物通风系统处理酸性矿井污水污染土壤的比较评价

Ifeanyi Michael Smarte Anekwe , Yusuf Makarfi Isa
{"title":"废水与生物通风系统处理酸性矿井污水污染土壤的比较评价","authors":"Ifeanyi Michael Smarte Anekwe ,&nbsp;Yusuf Makarfi Isa","doi":"10.1016/j.wen.2021.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The increasing rate of soil pollution poses a prolific threat to the sustenance of the ecosystem. Acid mine drainage (AMD) is an environmental problem that has contributed immensely to soil pedogenesis and contamination associated with mining activities. Physical, chemical, and thermal methods of soil treatment have some rooms for improvement to meet remediation purposes. Contrary to other methods, bioremediation is a cost-effective and a sustainable biological approach that utilizes microorganisms for the remediation of a contaminated environment and does not recontaminate or further degrade the soil after application. This study aims to comparatively evaluate the application of wastewater and bioventing system for the the treatment of AMD contaminated soils. A microcosm containing 1 kg of contaminated soil was amended with wastewaters of varying (biostimulation (BSTa)) while bioventing treatment (BVTa) consists of the injection of atmospheric air through the vadose zone into bioreactors and amended with wastewater effluents. The treatment was conducted at ambient condition for 28 days. The result of the treatment recorded 28–67% and 58–70% metal (Mn, Fe, Al, Cu and Zn) removal efficiencies with 51% and 34% sulfate removal efficiencies for BSTa and BVTa treatments, respectively. However, attempts to improve the sulfate removal efficiencies through the injection of atmospheric air were not effective. This study showed that wastewater and bioventing can be effectively applied as a potential alternative for the treatment of AMD contaminated soils.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101279,"journal":{"name":"Water-Energy Nexus","volume":"4 ","pages":"Pages 134-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wen.2021.08.001","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of wastewater and bioventing system for the treatment of acid mine drainage contaminated soils\",\"authors\":\"Ifeanyi Michael Smarte Anekwe ,&nbsp;Yusuf Makarfi Isa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wen.2021.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The increasing rate of soil pollution poses a prolific threat to the sustenance of the ecosystem. Acid mine drainage (AMD) is an environmental problem that has contributed immensely to soil pedogenesis and contamination associated with mining activities. Physical, chemical, and thermal methods of soil treatment have some rooms for improvement to meet remediation purposes. Contrary to other methods, bioremediation is a cost-effective and a sustainable biological approach that utilizes microorganisms for the remediation of a contaminated environment and does not recontaminate or further degrade the soil after application. This study aims to comparatively evaluate the application of wastewater and bioventing system for the the treatment of AMD contaminated soils. A microcosm containing 1 kg of contaminated soil was amended with wastewaters of varying (biostimulation (BSTa)) while bioventing treatment (BVTa) consists of the injection of atmospheric air through the vadose zone into bioreactors and amended with wastewater effluents. The treatment was conducted at ambient condition for 28 days. The result of the treatment recorded 28–67% and 58–70% metal (Mn, Fe, Al, Cu and Zn) removal efficiencies with 51% and 34% sulfate removal efficiencies for BSTa and BVTa treatments, respectively. However, attempts to improve the sulfate removal efficiencies through the injection of atmospheric air were not effective. This study showed that wastewater and bioventing can be effectively applied as a potential alternative for the treatment of AMD contaminated soils.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water-Energy Nexus\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 134-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wen.2021.08.001\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water-Energy Nexus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588912521000126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water-Energy Nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588912521000126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

日益严重的土壤污染对生态系统的维持构成了严重的威胁。酸性矿井排水是一个环境问题,它极大地促进了与采矿活动有关的土壤成土和污染。物理、化学和热处理土壤的方法有一定的改进空间,以满足修复的目的。与其他方法相反,生物修复是一种具有成本效益和可持续的生物方法,它利用微生物修复受污染的环境,并且在施用后不会再污染或进一步降解土壤。本研究旨在比较评价废水和生物通风系统在处理AMD污染土壤中的应用。在含有1 kg污染土壤的微观环境中,用不同(生物刺激(BSTa))的废水进行处理,而生物通风处理(BVTa)包括通过渗透区向生物反应器注入大气空气,并用废水进行处理。环境条件下处理28 d。处理结果显示,BSTa和BVTa处理的金属(Mn、Fe、Al、Cu和Zn)去除率分别为28-67%和58-70%,硫酸盐去除率分别为51%和34%。然而,试图通过注入大气空气来提高硫酸盐的去除效率是无效的。该研究表明,废水和生物通风可以作为一种潜在的替代方法有效地应用于AMD污染土壤的处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of wastewater and bioventing system for the treatment of acid mine drainage contaminated soils

The increasing rate of soil pollution poses a prolific threat to the sustenance of the ecosystem. Acid mine drainage (AMD) is an environmental problem that has contributed immensely to soil pedogenesis and contamination associated with mining activities. Physical, chemical, and thermal methods of soil treatment have some rooms for improvement to meet remediation purposes. Contrary to other methods, bioremediation is a cost-effective and a sustainable biological approach that utilizes microorganisms for the remediation of a contaminated environment and does not recontaminate or further degrade the soil after application. This study aims to comparatively evaluate the application of wastewater and bioventing system for the the treatment of AMD contaminated soils. A microcosm containing 1 kg of contaminated soil was amended with wastewaters of varying (biostimulation (BSTa)) while bioventing treatment (BVTa) consists of the injection of atmospheric air through the vadose zone into bioreactors and amended with wastewater effluents. The treatment was conducted at ambient condition for 28 days. The result of the treatment recorded 28–67% and 58–70% metal (Mn, Fe, Al, Cu and Zn) removal efficiencies with 51% and 34% sulfate removal efficiencies for BSTa and BVTa treatments, respectively. However, attempts to improve the sulfate removal efficiencies through the injection of atmospheric air were not effective. This study showed that wastewater and bioventing can be effectively applied as a potential alternative for the treatment of AMD contaminated soils.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信