沙特阿拉伯卡西姆省义齿医师和牙科技术人员对修复体和种植体部件交叉感染控制的比较研究

N. A. Sedky
{"title":"沙特阿拉伯卡西姆省义齿医师和牙科技术人员对修复体和种植体部件交叉感染控制的比较研究","authors":"N. A. Sedky","doi":"10.3396/ijic.v15i4.016.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objectives were to compare the performance of infection control practices among prosthodontists and dental technicians in Al-Qassim Province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia with regard to dental prostheses, impression copings, implant analogs and customized implant abutments (implant components). Self-administered questionnaires were submitted to 48 prosthodontists and 46 laboratory technicians in three cities. The questionnaires consisted of 19 questions for prosthodontists and 21 questions for laboratory technicians. All questionnaires were reviewed in situ to make sure they were fulfilled completely. \nA statistically significant difference was found between participants regarding receiving refresher infection control courses, while there was no statistical difference concerning disinfection protocols as well as communication regarding disinfection of prosthesis. For disinfection of different types of prosthesis before sending to lab/clinic, higher percentage of dentists applied this procedure (42.55% and 40.43%) compared to technicians (17.02% and 18.09%), while disinfection after return was higher among technicians (43.62% and 46.81%). Concerning implant components, dentists registered a low percentage for disinfection/sterilization of sent and returned items (13.83% and 7.45%), whereas 46.81% of technicians disinfect/sterilize implant components upon return from clinic. \nIn conclusion, there was shortage of appropriate practice of infection control procedures in prosthodontic clinics and labs regarding the disinfection of dental prostheses as well as the disinfection/sterilization of implant components upon sent/returned to the dental lab/clinic.","PeriodicalId":13991,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Infection Control","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of practicing cross-infection control of dental prostheses and implant components among prosthodontists and dental technicians in Qassim province, Saudi Arabia\",\"authors\":\"N. A. Sedky\",\"doi\":\"10.3396/ijic.v15i4.016.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objectives were to compare the performance of infection control practices among prosthodontists and dental technicians in Al-Qassim Province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia with regard to dental prostheses, impression copings, implant analogs and customized implant abutments (implant components). Self-administered questionnaires were submitted to 48 prosthodontists and 46 laboratory technicians in three cities. The questionnaires consisted of 19 questions for prosthodontists and 21 questions for laboratory technicians. All questionnaires were reviewed in situ to make sure they were fulfilled completely. \\nA statistically significant difference was found between participants regarding receiving refresher infection control courses, while there was no statistical difference concerning disinfection protocols as well as communication regarding disinfection of prosthesis. For disinfection of different types of prosthesis before sending to lab/clinic, higher percentage of dentists applied this procedure (42.55% and 40.43%) compared to technicians (17.02% and 18.09%), while disinfection after return was higher among technicians (43.62% and 46.81%). Concerning implant components, dentists registered a low percentage for disinfection/sterilization of sent and returned items (13.83% and 7.45%), whereas 46.81% of technicians disinfect/sterilize implant components upon return from clinic. \\nIn conclusion, there was shortage of appropriate practice of infection control procedures in prosthodontic clinics and labs regarding the disinfection of dental prostheses as well as the disinfection/sterilization of implant components upon sent/returned to the dental lab/clinic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Infection Control\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Infection Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3396/ijic.v15i4.016.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3396/ijic.v15i4.016.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的是比较沙特阿拉伯王国Al-Qassim省的义齿医生和牙科技术人员在义齿、印模覆盖物、种植体类似物和定制种植基台(种植体部件)方面的感染控制实践的表现。研究人员向来自三个城市的48名口腔修复专家和46名实验室技术人员提交了问卷。问卷包括修复医师19道题,实验室技术人员21道题。所有的调查问卷都在现场进行了审查,以确保完全完成。参与者在接受更新感染控制课程方面差异有统计学意义,而在消毒方案和假体消毒沟通方面差异无统计学意义。不同类型假体送往实验室/诊所前消毒的比例,牙医(42.55%)和技师(40.43%)高于技师(17.02%和18.09%),技师(43.62%和46.81%)高于送回实验室/诊所后消毒。在种植体组件方面,牙医对送出和退回的物品进行消毒/灭菌的比例较低(13.83%和7.45%),而技术人员在从诊所返回时对种植体组件进行消毒/灭菌的比例为46.81%。总之,口腔修复诊所和实验室缺乏适当的感染控制程序,包括牙体的消毒以及送/回口腔实验室/诊所时种植体部件的消毒/灭菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study of practicing cross-infection control of dental prostheses and implant components among prosthodontists and dental technicians in Qassim province, Saudi Arabia
The objectives were to compare the performance of infection control practices among prosthodontists and dental technicians in Al-Qassim Province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia with regard to dental prostheses, impression copings, implant analogs and customized implant abutments (implant components). Self-administered questionnaires were submitted to 48 prosthodontists and 46 laboratory technicians in three cities. The questionnaires consisted of 19 questions for prosthodontists and 21 questions for laboratory technicians. All questionnaires were reviewed in situ to make sure they were fulfilled completely. A statistically significant difference was found between participants regarding receiving refresher infection control courses, while there was no statistical difference concerning disinfection protocols as well as communication regarding disinfection of prosthesis. For disinfection of different types of prosthesis before sending to lab/clinic, higher percentage of dentists applied this procedure (42.55% and 40.43%) compared to technicians (17.02% and 18.09%), while disinfection after return was higher among technicians (43.62% and 46.81%). Concerning implant components, dentists registered a low percentage for disinfection/sterilization of sent and returned items (13.83% and 7.45%), whereas 46.81% of technicians disinfect/sterilize implant components upon return from clinic. In conclusion, there was shortage of appropriate practice of infection control procedures in prosthodontic clinics and labs regarding the disinfection of dental prostheses as well as the disinfection/sterilization of implant components upon sent/returned to the dental lab/clinic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信