挪威早期描述的多毛类物种(环节动物)的原始标本和模式位置,特别注意O.F. m ller和M. Sars描述的物种

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
E. Oug, T. Bakken, J. Kongsrud
{"title":"挪威早期描述的多毛类物种(环节动物)的原始标本和模式位置,特别注意O.F. m<s:1> ller和M. Sars描述的物种","authors":"E. Oug, T. Bakken, J. Kongsrud","doi":"10.24199/J.MMV.2014.71.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Oug, E., Bakken, T. and Kongsrud, J.A. 2014. Original specimens and type localities of early described polychaete species (Annelida) from Norway, with particular attention to species described by O.F. Muller and M. Sars. Memoirs of Museum Victoria 71: 217–236. Early descriptions of species from Norwegian waters are reviewed, with a focus on the basic requirements for reassessing their characteristics, in particular, by clarifying the status of the original material and locating sampling sites. A large number of polychaete species from the North Atlantic were described in the early period of zoological studies in the 18th and 19th centuries. The descriptions were often short or referred solely to general characteristics, which by today’s standards are considered inadequate for species discrimination. As a result, a number of taxa among the so-called ‘wellknown and widely distributed’ species have later been confused with morphologically similar species. Close to 100 presently valid species were described from Norwegian waters before 1900. The most prolific contributions were made by O.F. Muller (with about 20 species from 1771–1776) and Michael Sars (with more than 50 species from 1829–1872). Other authors in the 19th century included Anders Orsted, Heinrich Rathke and Gerhard Armauer Hansen. Descriptions were mostly in Latin (O.F. Muller) or in Norwegian or Danish with the diagnosis in Latin (M. Sars and contemporary naturalists). Original material from O.F. Muller is not known to exist. Original material from M. Sars and contemporary scientists does still exist, but is often not identified as original (‘syntypes’) and is occasionally spread over several museum collections. Locating original sampling localities (‘type localities’) has been achieved by combining information from various literature sources, labels of original material (when extant), and knowledge of historic place names.","PeriodicalId":53647,"journal":{"name":"Memoirs of Museum Victoria","volume":"35 1","pages":"217-236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Original specimens and type localities of early described polychaete species (Annelida) from Norway, with particular attention to species described by O.F. Müller and M. Sars\",\"authors\":\"E. Oug, T. Bakken, J. Kongsrud\",\"doi\":\"10.24199/J.MMV.2014.71.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Oug, E., Bakken, T. and Kongsrud, J.A. 2014. Original specimens and type localities of early described polychaete species (Annelida) from Norway, with particular attention to species described by O.F. Muller and M. Sars. Memoirs of Museum Victoria 71: 217–236. Early descriptions of species from Norwegian waters are reviewed, with a focus on the basic requirements for reassessing their characteristics, in particular, by clarifying the status of the original material and locating sampling sites. A large number of polychaete species from the North Atlantic were described in the early period of zoological studies in the 18th and 19th centuries. The descriptions were often short or referred solely to general characteristics, which by today’s standards are considered inadequate for species discrimination. As a result, a number of taxa among the so-called ‘wellknown and widely distributed’ species have later been confused with morphologically similar species. Close to 100 presently valid species were described from Norwegian waters before 1900. The most prolific contributions were made by O.F. Muller (with about 20 species from 1771–1776) and Michael Sars (with more than 50 species from 1829–1872). Other authors in the 19th century included Anders Orsted, Heinrich Rathke and Gerhard Armauer Hansen. Descriptions were mostly in Latin (O.F. Muller) or in Norwegian or Danish with the diagnosis in Latin (M. Sars and contemporary naturalists). Original material from O.F. Muller is not known to exist. Original material from M. Sars and contemporary scientists does still exist, but is often not identified as original (‘syntypes’) and is occasionally spread over several museum collections. Locating original sampling localities (‘type localities’) has been achieved by combining information from various literature sources, labels of original material (when extant), and knowledge of historic place names.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Memoirs of Museum Victoria\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"217-236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Memoirs of Museum Victoria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24199/J.MMV.2014.71.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memoirs of Museum Victoria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24199/J.MMV.2014.71.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

Oug, E., Bakken, T.和Kongsrud, J.A. 2014。挪威早期描述的多毛类物种(环节动物)的原始标本和模式位置,特别注意由O.F. Muller和M. Sars描述的物种。维多利亚博物馆回忆录71:217-236。对来自挪威水域的物种的早期描述进行了审查,重点是重新评估其特征的基本要求,特别是通过澄清原始材料的状况和确定采样地点。在18世纪和19世纪早期的动物学研究中,人们描述了北大西洋的大量多毛类物种。这些描述通常很短,或者只涉及一般特征,按照今天的标准,这些特征被认为不足以用于物种区分。结果,在所谓的“众所周知和广泛分布”的物种中,许多分类群后来与形态相似的物种混淆了。1900年以前在挪威海域发现了近100种目前有效的物种。贡献最多的是O.F. Muller(1771-1776年有大约20种)和Michael Sars(1829-1872年有超过50种)。19世纪的其他作家包括安德斯·奥斯特德、海因里希·拉特克和格哈德·阿莫尔·汉森。描述大多用拉丁语(O.F. Muller),或者用挪威语或丹麦语,诊断用拉丁语(M. Sars和当代博物学家)。O.F.穆勒的原始材料不知道是否存在。萨斯先生和当代科学家的原始材料仍然存在,但往往不被确定为原始(“模式”),偶尔分散在几个博物馆的收藏品中。定位原始采样地点(“类型地点”)是通过结合各种文献来源的信息、原始材料的标签(当存在时)和历史地名的知识来实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Original specimens and type localities of early described polychaete species (Annelida) from Norway, with particular attention to species described by O.F. Müller and M. Sars
Oug, E., Bakken, T. and Kongsrud, J.A. 2014. Original specimens and type localities of early described polychaete species (Annelida) from Norway, with particular attention to species described by O.F. Muller and M. Sars. Memoirs of Museum Victoria 71: 217–236. Early descriptions of species from Norwegian waters are reviewed, with a focus on the basic requirements for reassessing their characteristics, in particular, by clarifying the status of the original material and locating sampling sites. A large number of polychaete species from the North Atlantic were described in the early period of zoological studies in the 18th and 19th centuries. The descriptions were often short or referred solely to general characteristics, which by today’s standards are considered inadequate for species discrimination. As a result, a number of taxa among the so-called ‘wellknown and widely distributed’ species have later been confused with morphologically similar species. Close to 100 presently valid species were described from Norwegian waters before 1900. The most prolific contributions were made by O.F. Muller (with about 20 species from 1771–1776) and Michael Sars (with more than 50 species from 1829–1872). Other authors in the 19th century included Anders Orsted, Heinrich Rathke and Gerhard Armauer Hansen. Descriptions were mostly in Latin (O.F. Muller) or in Norwegian or Danish with the diagnosis in Latin (M. Sars and contemporary naturalists). Original material from O.F. Muller is not known to exist. Original material from M. Sars and contemporary scientists does still exist, but is often not identified as original (‘syntypes’) and is occasionally spread over several museum collections. Locating original sampling localities (‘type localities’) has been achieved by combining information from various literature sources, labels of original material (when extant), and knowledge of historic place names.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Memoirs of Museum Victoria
Memoirs of Museum Victoria Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信