对南印度一家三级医院重症监护病房抗生素使用情况的审计

R. Rajendran, S. Seralathan
{"title":"对南印度一家三级医院重症监护病房抗生素使用情况的审计","authors":"R. Rajendran, S. Seralathan","doi":"10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_47_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Antibiotics are one of the major medications used in the intensive care unit (ICU). It is a matter of concern as inappropriate usage of antibiotics in the ICU has led to the development of many infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms. The aim was to monitor and assess the empirical antibiotic treatment initiated and the changes made in antimicrobial therapy following the culture report. Methodology: The study was conducted from May 2018 to June 2018 after obtaining ethical clearance from the institute ethics committee which was a cross-sectional prospective type of study. One hundred patients who were on antibiotics were included in the study. A total of 249 culture samples were sent which included blood, urine, endotracheal aspirate, sputum, cerebrospinal fluid, wound swab, etc., The patients were started empirically with antibiotics ceftriaxone, imipenem, meropenem, amikacin, azithromycin, etc., The microorganisms grown in the culture were Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter species, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, etc. Results: It was observed that for 54 patients, the empirical antibiotic treatment was continued, for 39 patients, there was a change in antibiotics following the culture report, and for Seven patients, the antibiotics were stopped. Among 39 patients, for 23 patients, there was an escalation, and for 16 patients, there was a de-escalation in the usage of antibiotics from the initial empirical treatment given. Conclusion: A proper prescription pattern and a standard antibiotic policy for prescribing antibiotics are needed to prevent the future development of MDR strains.","PeriodicalId":32638,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine","volume":"46 1","pages":"156 - 161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Audit of antibiotics usage in an intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital in South India\",\"authors\":\"R. Rajendran, S. Seralathan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_47_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Antibiotics are one of the major medications used in the intensive care unit (ICU). It is a matter of concern as inappropriate usage of antibiotics in the ICU has led to the development of many infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms. The aim was to monitor and assess the empirical antibiotic treatment initiated and the changes made in antimicrobial therapy following the culture report. Methodology: The study was conducted from May 2018 to June 2018 after obtaining ethical clearance from the institute ethics committee which was a cross-sectional prospective type of study. One hundred patients who were on antibiotics were included in the study. A total of 249 culture samples were sent which included blood, urine, endotracheal aspirate, sputum, cerebrospinal fluid, wound swab, etc., The patients were started empirically with antibiotics ceftriaxone, imipenem, meropenem, amikacin, azithromycin, etc., The microorganisms grown in the culture were Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter species, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, etc. Results: It was observed that for 54 patients, the empirical antibiotic treatment was continued, for 39 patients, there was a change in antibiotics following the culture report, and for Seven patients, the antibiotics were stopped. Among 39 patients, for 23 patients, there was an escalation, and for 16 patients, there was a de-escalation in the usage of antibiotics from the initial empirical treatment given. Conclusion: A proper prescription pattern and a standard antibiotic policy for prescribing antibiotics are needed to prevent the future development of MDR strains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"156 - 161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_47_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_47_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:抗生素是重症监护病房(ICU)使用的主要药物之一。这是一个值得关注的问题,因为在ICU不适当使用抗生素已经导致许多感染的发展,由于多药耐药(MDR)的有机体。目的是监测和评估在培养报告后开始的经验性抗生素治疗和抗菌治疗的变化。方法:本研究在获得研究所伦理委员会的伦理许可后,于2018年5月至2018年6月进行,这是一项横断面前瞻性研究。100名服用抗生素的患者参与了这项研究。共送培养标本249份,包括血液、尿液、气管内吸出液、痰液、脑脊液、创面拭子等,患者经验性开始使用头孢曲松、亚胺培南、美罗培南、阿米卡星、阿奇霉素等抗生素,培养中培养的微生物有大肠杆菌、不动杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、铜绿假单胞菌等。结果:54例患者继续使用经验性抗生素治疗,39例患者在培养报告后抗生素发生变化,7例患者停用抗生素。在39例患者中,有23例患者的抗生素使用与最初的经验性治疗相比有所增加,有16例患者的抗生素使用有所减少。结论:合理的处方模式和规范的用药政策是预防耐多药菌株未来发展的必要措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Audit of antibiotics usage in an intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital in South India
Background: Antibiotics are one of the major medications used in the intensive care unit (ICU). It is a matter of concern as inappropriate usage of antibiotics in the ICU has led to the development of many infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms. The aim was to monitor and assess the empirical antibiotic treatment initiated and the changes made in antimicrobial therapy following the culture report. Methodology: The study was conducted from May 2018 to June 2018 after obtaining ethical clearance from the institute ethics committee which was a cross-sectional prospective type of study. One hundred patients who were on antibiotics were included in the study. A total of 249 culture samples were sent which included blood, urine, endotracheal aspirate, sputum, cerebrospinal fluid, wound swab, etc., The patients were started empirically with antibiotics ceftriaxone, imipenem, meropenem, amikacin, azithromycin, etc., The microorganisms grown in the culture were Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter species, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, etc. Results: It was observed that for 54 patients, the empirical antibiotic treatment was continued, for 39 patients, there was a change in antibiotics following the culture report, and for Seven patients, the antibiotics were stopped. Among 39 patients, for 23 patients, there was an escalation, and for 16 patients, there was a de-escalation in the usage of antibiotics from the initial empirical treatment given. Conclusion: A proper prescription pattern and a standard antibiotic policy for prescribing antibiotics are needed to prevent the future development of MDR strains.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信