希腊语版肩关节疼痛和残疾指数 (SPADI):翻译、文化适应和肩袖撕裂患者验证。

IF 0.4 4区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
JOURNAL OF PACIFIC HISTORY Pub Date : 2016-12-01 Epub Date: 2016-09-13 DOI:10.1007/s10195-016-0425-8
S Vrouva, C Batistaki, E Koutsioumpa, D Kostopoulos, E Stamoulis, G Kostopanagiotou
{"title":"希腊语版肩关节疼痛和残疾指数 (SPADI):翻译、文化适应和肩袖撕裂患者验证。","authors":"S Vrouva, C Batistaki, E Koutsioumpa, D Kostopoulos, E Stamoulis, G Kostopanagiotou","doi":"10.1007/s10195-016-0425-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt a Greek version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) questionnaire and to validate its usage in Greek patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A forward and backward translation was performed, and the final version of the Greek questionnaire was administered to 134 outpatients (mean age 47.4 ± 14.5) with rotator cuff tear under conservative treatment. The questionnaire was re-administered 2-5 days later to assess test-retest reliability. Patients completed the Greek SPADI, the Greek version of the Quick DASH (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire) and the EuroQoL EQ-5D. 102 of the 134 questionnaires were considered valid.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The internal consistencies of the SPADI total and its subscales measured with Cronbach's alpha coefficient were high (0.932 for SPADI-Total, 0.899 for SPADI-Disability, 0.905 for SPADI-Pain). Intraclass correlation coefficients showed excellent test-retest reliability (0.899 for Disability, 0.902 for Pain, and 0.929 for total SPADI). A significantly high positive correlation was found between the SPADI total score and its subscales, and Quick DASH for Pain and Disability. Significant correlations were also found between SPADI scales and EQ-5D variables. There was a moderate positive correlation with the variables \"self-reliance\" (r = 0.66), \"common activities\" (r = 0.58), and \"pain/discomfort\" (r = 0.49), and a weaker correlation with the \"mobility\" variable (r = 0.20). Factor analysis (PAF method) revealed a bidimensional formation of the SPADI. Eight items (five pain/three disability) weighted the first factor by >0.5, and five disability items weighted the second factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Greek SPADI represents a valid and reliable tool for measuring pain and disability in patients with painful shoulder disorders.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p>","PeriodicalId":45229,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PACIFIC HISTORY","volume":"26 1","pages":"315-326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5071243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Greek version of Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI): translation, cultural adaptation, and validation in patients with rotator cuff tear.\",\"authors\":\"S Vrouva, C Batistaki, E Koutsioumpa, D Kostopoulos, E Stamoulis, G Kostopanagiotou\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10195-016-0425-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt a Greek version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) questionnaire and to validate its usage in Greek patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A forward and backward translation was performed, and the final version of the Greek questionnaire was administered to 134 outpatients (mean age 47.4 ± 14.5) with rotator cuff tear under conservative treatment. The questionnaire was re-administered 2-5 days later to assess test-retest reliability. Patients completed the Greek SPADI, the Greek version of the Quick DASH (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire) and the EuroQoL EQ-5D. 102 of the 134 questionnaires were considered valid.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The internal consistencies of the SPADI total and its subscales measured with Cronbach's alpha coefficient were high (0.932 for SPADI-Total, 0.899 for SPADI-Disability, 0.905 for SPADI-Pain). Intraclass correlation coefficients showed excellent test-retest reliability (0.899 for Disability, 0.902 for Pain, and 0.929 for total SPADI). A significantly high positive correlation was found between the SPADI total score and its subscales, and Quick DASH for Pain and Disability. Significant correlations were also found between SPADI scales and EQ-5D variables. There was a moderate positive correlation with the variables \\\"self-reliance\\\" (r = 0.66), \\\"common activities\\\" (r = 0.58), and \\\"pain/discomfort\\\" (r = 0.49), and a weaker correlation with the \\\"mobility\\\" variable (r = 0.20). Factor analysis (PAF method) revealed a bidimensional formation of the SPADI. Eight items (five pain/three disability) weighted the first factor by >0.5, and five disability items weighted the second factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Greek SPADI represents a valid and reliable tool for measuring pain and disability in patients with painful shoulder disorders.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF PACIFIC HISTORY\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"315-326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5071243/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF PACIFIC HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-016-0425-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/9/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF PACIFIC HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-016-0425-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在翻译希腊语版本的肩部疼痛和残疾指数(SPADI)问卷,并对其在希腊患者中的使用进行文化适应性调整:本研究旨在翻译希腊语版的肩关节疼痛和残疾指数(SPADI)问卷,并对其进行文化适应性调整,同时验证其在希腊患者中的使用效果:对 134 名接受保守治疗的肩袖撕裂门诊患者(平均年龄 47.4 ± 14.5)进行了正向和反向翻译,并对最终版本的希腊语问卷进行了测试。2-5 天后再次进行问卷调查,以评估测试-再测可靠性。患者填写了希腊语 SPADI、希腊语版快速 DASH(手臂、肩部和手部残疾问卷)和 EuroQoL EQ-5D。134份问卷中有102份有效:用 Cronbach's alpha 系数测量的 SPADI 总量表及其分量表的内部一致性很高(SPADI-总量表为 0.932,SPADI-残疾量表为 0.899,SPADI-疼痛量表为 0.905)。类内相关系数显示出极佳的测试-重测可靠性(残疾为 0.899,疼痛为 0.902,SPADI 总计为 0.929)。SPADI 总分及其分量表与疼痛和残疾的快速 DASH 之间存在明显的高度正相关。SPADI 量表与 EQ-5D 变量之间也存在显著相关性。与 "自立 "变量(r = 0.66)、"常见活动 "变量(r = 0.58)和 "疼痛/不适 "变量(r = 0.49)呈中度正相关,与 "活动能力 "变量(r = 0.20)的相关性较弱。因子分析(PAF 法)显示,SPADI 可分为两个维度。八个项目(五个疼痛/三个残疾)在第一个因子中的权重大于 0.5,五个残疾项目在第二个因子中的权重大于 0.5:希腊语 SPADI 是测量肩关节疼痛性疾病患者疼痛和残疾情况的有效、可靠的工具:证据等级:3 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Greek version of Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI): translation, cultural adaptation, and validation in patients with rotator cuff tear.

Background: This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt a Greek version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) questionnaire and to validate its usage in Greek patients.

Materials and methods: A forward and backward translation was performed, and the final version of the Greek questionnaire was administered to 134 outpatients (mean age 47.4 ± 14.5) with rotator cuff tear under conservative treatment. The questionnaire was re-administered 2-5 days later to assess test-retest reliability. Patients completed the Greek SPADI, the Greek version of the Quick DASH (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire) and the EuroQoL EQ-5D. 102 of the 134 questionnaires were considered valid.

Results: The internal consistencies of the SPADI total and its subscales measured with Cronbach's alpha coefficient were high (0.932 for SPADI-Total, 0.899 for SPADI-Disability, 0.905 for SPADI-Pain). Intraclass correlation coefficients showed excellent test-retest reliability (0.899 for Disability, 0.902 for Pain, and 0.929 for total SPADI). A significantly high positive correlation was found between the SPADI total score and its subscales, and Quick DASH for Pain and Disability. Significant correlations were also found between SPADI scales and EQ-5D variables. There was a moderate positive correlation with the variables "self-reliance" (r = 0.66), "common activities" (r = 0.58), and "pain/discomfort" (r = 0.49), and a weaker correlation with the "mobility" variable (r = 0.20). Factor analysis (PAF method) revealed a bidimensional formation of the SPADI. Eight items (five pain/three disability) weighted the first factor by >0.5, and five disability items weighted the second factor.

Conclusions: The Greek SPADI represents a valid and reliable tool for measuring pain and disability in patients with painful shoulder disorders.

Level of evidence: Level 3.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pacific History is a refereed international journal serving historians, prehistorians, anthropologists and others interested in the study of mankind in the Pacific Islands (including Hawaii and New Guinea), and is concerned generally with political, economic, religious and cultural factors affecting human presence there. It publishes articles, annotated previously unpublished manuscripts, notes on source material and comment on current affairs. It also welcomes articles on other geographical regions, such as Africa and Southeast Asia, or of a theoretical character, where these are concerned with problems of significance in the Pacific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信