D. Böttjer-Wilson, Angelicque E. White, K. Björkman, M. Church, S. Poulos, E. Shimabukuro, YM Rii, A. Ludwig, K. V. Brockel, U. Riebesell, Ricardo M Letelier, D. Karl
{"title":"营养物富集对寡营养浮游植物群落的影响:美国夏威夷附近的一个中生态试验","authors":"D. Böttjer-Wilson, Angelicque E. White, K. Björkman, M. Church, S. Poulos, E. Shimabukuro, YM Rii, A. Ludwig, K. V. Brockel, U. Riebesell, Ricardo M Letelier, D. Karl","doi":"10.3354/ame01977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": A large-volume mesocosm-based nutrient perturbation experiment was conducted off the island of Hawai‘i, USA, to investigate the response of surface ocean phytoplankton communities to the addition of macronutrients, trace metals, and vitamins and to assess the feasibility of using mesocosms in the open ocean. Three free-drifting mesocosms (~60 m 3 ) were de ployed: one mesocosm served as a control (no nutrient amendments); a second (termed +P) was amended with nitrate (N), silicate (Si), phosphate (P), and a trace metal + vitamin mixture; and a third (termed −P) was amended with N, Si, and a trace metal + vitamin mixture but no P. These meso-cosms were unreplicated due to logistical constraints and hence differences between treatments are qualitative. After 6 d, the largest response of the phytoplankton community was ob served in the +P mesocosm, where chlorophyll a and 14 C-based primary production were 2−3× greater than in the −P mesocosm and 4−6× greater than in the control. Comparison between mesocosm and ‘microcosm’ incubations (20 l) revealed differences in the magnitude and timing of production and marked differences in community structure with a reduced response of diatoms in microcosm treatments. Notably, we also observed pronounced declines in Prochlorococcus populations in all treatments, although these were greater in microcosms (up to 99%). Overall, this study confirmed the feasibility of deploying free-drifting mesocosms in the open ocean as a potentially powerful tool to investigate ecological impacts of nutrient perturbations and constitutes a valuable first step towards scaling plankton manipulation experiments.","PeriodicalId":8112,"journal":{"name":"Aquatic Microbial Ecology","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of nutrient enrichments on oligotrophic phytoplankton communities: a mesocosm experiment near Hawai‘i, USA\",\"authors\":\"D. Böttjer-Wilson, Angelicque E. White, K. Björkman, M. Church, S. Poulos, E. Shimabukuro, YM Rii, A. Ludwig, K. V. Brockel, U. Riebesell, Ricardo M Letelier, D. Karl\",\"doi\":\"10.3354/ame01977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": A large-volume mesocosm-based nutrient perturbation experiment was conducted off the island of Hawai‘i, USA, to investigate the response of surface ocean phytoplankton communities to the addition of macronutrients, trace metals, and vitamins and to assess the feasibility of using mesocosms in the open ocean. Three free-drifting mesocosms (~60 m 3 ) were de ployed: one mesocosm served as a control (no nutrient amendments); a second (termed +P) was amended with nitrate (N), silicate (Si), phosphate (P), and a trace metal + vitamin mixture; and a third (termed −P) was amended with N, Si, and a trace metal + vitamin mixture but no P. These meso-cosms were unreplicated due to logistical constraints and hence differences between treatments are qualitative. After 6 d, the largest response of the phytoplankton community was ob served in the +P mesocosm, where chlorophyll a and 14 C-based primary production were 2−3× greater than in the −P mesocosm and 4−6× greater than in the control. Comparison between mesocosm and ‘microcosm’ incubations (20 l) revealed differences in the magnitude and timing of production and marked differences in community structure with a reduced response of diatoms in microcosm treatments. Notably, we also observed pronounced declines in Prochlorococcus populations in all treatments, although these were greater in microcosms (up to 99%). Overall, this study confirmed the feasibility of deploying free-drifting mesocosms in the open ocean as a potentially powerful tool to investigate ecological impacts of nutrient perturbations and constitutes a valuable first step towards scaling plankton manipulation experiments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aquatic Microbial Ecology\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aquatic Microbial Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3354/ame01977\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquatic Microbial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3354/ame01977","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of nutrient enrichments on oligotrophic phytoplankton communities: a mesocosm experiment near Hawai‘i, USA
: A large-volume mesocosm-based nutrient perturbation experiment was conducted off the island of Hawai‘i, USA, to investigate the response of surface ocean phytoplankton communities to the addition of macronutrients, trace metals, and vitamins and to assess the feasibility of using mesocosms in the open ocean. Three free-drifting mesocosms (~60 m 3 ) were de ployed: one mesocosm served as a control (no nutrient amendments); a second (termed +P) was amended with nitrate (N), silicate (Si), phosphate (P), and a trace metal + vitamin mixture; and a third (termed −P) was amended with N, Si, and a trace metal + vitamin mixture but no P. These meso-cosms were unreplicated due to logistical constraints and hence differences between treatments are qualitative. After 6 d, the largest response of the phytoplankton community was ob served in the +P mesocosm, where chlorophyll a and 14 C-based primary production were 2−3× greater than in the −P mesocosm and 4−6× greater than in the control. Comparison between mesocosm and ‘microcosm’ incubations (20 l) revealed differences in the magnitude and timing of production and marked differences in community structure with a reduced response of diatoms in microcosm treatments. Notably, we also observed pronounced declines in Prochlorococcus populations in all treatments, although these were greater in microcosms (up to 99%). Overall, this study confirmed the feasibility of deploying free-drifting mesocosms in the open ocean as a potentially powerful tool to investigate ecological impacts of nutrient perturbations and constitutes a valuable first step towards scaling plankton manipulation experiments.
期刊介绍:
AME is international and interdisciplinary. It presents rigorously refereed and carefully selected Research Articles, Reviews and Notes, as well as Comments/Reply Comments (for details see AME 27:209), Opinion Pieces (previously called ''As I See It'') and AME Specials. For details consult the Guidelines for Authors. Papers may be concerned with:
Tolerances and responses of microorganisms to variations in abiotic and biotic components of their environment; microbial life under extreme environmental conditions (climate, temperature, pressure, osmolarity, redox, etc.).
Role of aquatic microorganisms in the production, transformation and decomposition of organic matter; flow patterns of energy and matter as these pass through microorganisms; population dynamics; trophic interrelationships; modelling, both theoretical and via computer simulation, of individual microorganisms and microbial populations; biodiversity.
Absorption and transformation of inorganic material; synthesis and transformation of organic material (autotrophic and heterotrophic); non-genetic and genetic adaptation; behaviour; molecular microbial ecology; symbioses.