用Grasha-Reichmann学生学习风格量表评价南印度医学院本科医学生学习风格偏好的横断面研究

K. Prathibha, Nivedha Senkuttuvan Pillai
{"title":"用Grasha-Reichmann学生学习风格量表评价南印度医学院本科医学生学习风格偏好的横断面研究","authors":"K. Prathibha, Nivedha Senkuttuvan Pillai","doi":"10.15520/IJMHS.V10I06.3015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Understanding various learning styles and framing teaching strategies accordingly has become a cornerstone of good teaching practice.Grasha and Riechmann (1996) consider learning styles as social interactions. They classify them into six categories: Independent, Avoidant,Collaborative, Dependent, Competitive and Participant, each of whichhas its own characteristics.Hence, the present study was planned and conducted to evaluate thepreferences in learning styles among the undergraduate medical students of a South Indian medical college, using the GRSLSS.Methodology: The GRSLSS inventory was used for the assessment oflearning style preferences among the participants. The survey questionnaire comprised of 60 questions, amongst which, ten questions weregrouped for each of the six mentioned learning styles. The sum ofthe scores for the specified ten questions of each learning style wascalculated and then averaged. The mean scores were calculated andcompared using the Kruskal Wallis Test.Results: Among the 134 participants, there was a statistically significant difference in the distribution of learning style patterns amongindividuals.(p<0.01) There was a dominance of Collaborative andDependant learning type, followed by the Independent style. TheParticipant and Competitive learning styles were sparsely distributedamong the individuals.Discussion: A mismatch between the teaching style of a teacher andthe learning style of a student can render the teaching/learning processless effective. The present study highlighted that the student’s learningprocess and academic performance can be improved by tailoring theinstructional modality to the student’s preference or style, wheneverfeasible.Keywords: Grasha Reichman, Learning Scale, Learning Style, Studentcentered learning.","PeriodicalId":13590,"journal":{"name":"Innovative Journal of Medical and Health Science","volume":"34 1","pages":"1040-1044"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Preferences in Learning Styles among Undergraduate Medical Students of a South Indian Medical College using the Grasha-Reichmann Student Learning Style Scales: A Cross-Sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"K. Prathibha, Nivedha Senkuttuvan Pillai\",\"doi\":\"10.15520/IJMHS.V10I06.3015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:Understanding various learning styles and framing teaching strategies accordingly has become a cornerstone of good teaching practice.Grasha and Riechmann (1996) consider learning styles as social interactions. They classify them into six categories: Independent, Avoidant,Collaborative, Dependent, Competitive and Participant, each of whichhas its own characteristics.Hence, the present study was planned and conducted to evaluate thepreferences in learning styles among the undergraduate medical students of a South Indian medical college, using the GRSLSS.Methodology: The GRSLSS inventory was used for the assessment oflearning style preferences among the participants. The survey questionnaire comprised of 60 questions, amongst which, ten questions weregrouped for each of the six mentioned learning styles. The sum ofthe scores for the specified ten questions of each learning style wascalculated and then averaged. The mean scores were calculated andcompared using the Kruskal Wallis Test.Results: Among the 134 participants, there was a statistically significant difference in the distribution of learning style patterns amongindividuals.(p<0.01) There was a dominance of Collaborative andDependant learning type, followed by the Independent style. TheParticipant and Competitive learning styles were sparsely distributedamong the individuals.Discussion: A mismatch between the teaching style of a teacher andthe learning style of a student can render the teaching/learning processless effective. The present study highlighted that the student’s learningprocess and academic performance can be improved by tailoring theinstructional modality to the student’s preference or style, wheneverfeasible.Keywords: Grasha Reichman, Learning Scale, Learning Style, Studentcentered learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovative Journal of Medical and Health Science\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"1040-1044\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovative Journal of Medical and Health Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15520/IJMHS.V10I06.3015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovative Journal of Medical and Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15520/IJMHS.V10I06.3015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:了解不同的学习风格并制定相应的教学策略已成为良好教学实践的基石。Grasha和Riechmann(1996)认为学习风格是一种社会互动。他们将其分为六类:独立型、回避型、合作型、依赖型、竞争型和参与型,每一类都有自己的特点。因此,本研究旨在利用GRSLSS评估南印度医学院本科医学生的学习风格偏好。方法:采用GRSLSS量表评估被试的学习风格偏好。调查问卷共有60个问题,其中,针对上述六种学习方式,每组10个问题。计算每种学习方式的10道题的总得分,然后取平均值。使用Kruskal Wallis Test计算和比较平均得分。结果:在134名被试中,个体间的学习风格分布差异有统计学意义(p<0.01),以协作型和依赖型学习风格为主,其次是独立型学习风格。参与型和竞争型学习风格在个体中分布稀疏。讨论:教师的教学风格和学生的学习风格之间的不匹配会使教学/学习过程无效。本研究强调,在可行的情况下,根据学生的偏好或风格量身定制教学模式,可以改善学生的学习过程和学业成绩。关键词:Grasha Reichman,学习量表,学习风格,以学生为中心的学习
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Preferences in Learning Styles among Undergraduate Medical Students of a South Indian Medical College using the Grasha-Reichmann Student Learning Style Scales: A Cross-Sectional Study
Background:Understanding various learning styles and framing teaching strategies accordingly has become a cornerstone of good teaching practice.Grasha and Riechmann (1996) consider learning styles as social interactions. They classify them into six categories: Independent, Avoidant,Collaborative, Dependent, Competitive and Participant, each of whichhas its own characteristics.Hence, the present study was planned and conducted to evaluate thepreferences in learning styles among the undergraduate medical students of a South Indian medical college, using the GRSLSS.Methodology: The GRSLSS inventory was used for the assessment oflearning style preferences among the participants. The survey questionnaire comprised of 60 questions, amongst which, ten questions weregrouped for each of the six mentioned learning styles. The sum ofthe scores for the specified ten questions of each learning style wascalculated and then averaged. The mean scores were calculated andcompared using the Kruskal Wallis Test.Results: Among the 134 participants, there was a statistically significant difference in the distribution of learning style patterns amongindividuals.(p<0.01) There was a dominance of Collaborative andDependant learning type, followed by the Independent style. TheParticipant and Competitive learning styles were sparsely distributedamong the individuals.Discussion: A mismatch between the teaching style of a teacher andthe learning style of a student can render the teaching/learning processless effective. The present study highlighted that the student’s learningprocess and academic performance can be improved by tailoring theinstructional modality to the student’s preference or style, wheneverfeasible.Keywords: Grasha Reichman, Learning Scale, Learning Style, Studentcentered learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信