联盟形成的不同原理与战略投票的激励

IF 1 4区 数学
Eric Linhart, Johannes Raabe
{"title":"联盟形成的不同原理与战略投票的激励","authors":"Eric Linhart, Johannes Raabe","doi":"10.4236/am.2018.97058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on strategic voting has mainly focused on electoral system effects but \nlargely neglected the impact of different rationales of coalition formation. Based \non a formal model of rational party choice and a simulation study, we systematically \ninvestigate this impact and explore the implications. We show that the \nlogic of the underlying coalition formation procedure clearly affects the degree \nto which the electorate is exposed to strategic incentives regarding the vote \nchoice. The key implications are that sincere voting is more often in the voter’s \nbest interest if parties are policy-seeking and if there is increased uncertainty \nduring the stage of coalition formation. Furthermore, we explore how \ndifferent types of coalition formation affect strategic incentives across the policy \nspace.","PeriodicalId":55568,"journal":{"name":"Applied Mathematics-A Journal of Chinese Universities Series B","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different Rationales of Coalition Formation and Incentives for Strategic Voting\",\"authors\":\"Eric Linhart, Johannes Raabe\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/am.2018.97058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research on strategic voting has mainly focused on electoral system effects but \\nlargely neglected the impact of different rationales of coalition formation. Based \\non a formal model of rational party choice and a simulation study, we systematically \\ninvestigate this impact and explore the implications. We show that the \\nlogic of the underlying coalition formation procedure clearly affects the degree \\nto which the electorate is exposed to strategic incentives regarding the vote \\nchoice. The key implications are that sincere voting is more often in the voter’s \\nbest interest if parties are policy-seeking and if there is increased uncertainty \\nduring the stage of coalition formation. Furthermore, we explore how \\ndifferent types of coalition formation affect strategic incentives across the policy \\nspace.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Mathematics-A Journal of Chinese Universities Series B\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Mathematics-A Journal of Chinese Universities Series B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2018.97058\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Mathematics-A Journal of Chinese Universities Series B","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2018.97058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对战略投票的研究主要集中在选举制度效应上,而忽略了不同组阁理由的影响。基于理性政党选择的正式模型和模拟研究,我们系统地研究了这种影响并探讨了其含义。我们表明,潜在联盟形成程序的逻辑清楚地影响选民在投票选择方面暴露于战略激励的程度。关键的含义是,如果政党寻求政策,如果在联盟组建阶段不确定性增加,真诚的投票往往更符合选民的最佳利益。此外,我们探讨了不同类型的联盟形成如何影响整个政策空间的战略激励。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Different Rationales of Coalition Formation and Incentives for Strategic Voting
Research on strategic voting has mainly focused on electoral system effects but largely neglected the impact of different rationales of coalition formation. Based on a formal model of rational party choice and a simulation study, we systematically investigate this impact and explore the implications. We show that the logic of the underlying coalition formation procedure clearly affects the degree to which the electorate is exposed to strategic incentives regarding the vote choice. The key implications are that sincere voting is more often in the voter’s best interest if parties are policy-seeking and if there is increased uncertainty during the stage of coalition formation. Furthermore, we explore how different types of coalition formation affect strategic incentives across the policy space.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
10.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Applied Mathematics promotes the integration of mathematics with other scientific disciplines, expanding its fields of study and promoting the development of relevant interdisciplinary subjects. The journal mainly publishes original research papers that apply mathematical concepts, theories and methods to other subjects such as physics, chemistry, biology, information science, energy, environmental science, economics, and finance. In addition, it also reports the latest developments and trends in which mathematics interacts with other disciplines. Readers include professors and students, professionals in applied mathematics, and engineers at research institutes and in industry. Applied Mathematics - A Journal of Chinese Universities has been an English-language quarterly since 1993. The English edition, abbreviated as Series B, has different contents than this Chinese edition, Series A.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信