路易斯安那州梅肯岭地区棉蚜防治,1991年

B. R. Leonard, J. Graves, D. Long
{"title":"路易斯安那州梅肯岭地区棉蚜防治,1991年","authors":"B. R. Leonard, J. Graves, D. Long","doi":"10.1093/iat/18.1.239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Two tests were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of selected insecticides against cotton aphids in non-irrigated cotton planted 17 Apr. For both tests, plots consisted of 4 rows (102 cm centers) x 15 m. Treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with 4 replications. The test field had been treated previously with Ammo 2.5 EC (0.033 kg [AI]/ha) to stimulate cotton aphid infestations. Insecticides were applied to Test 1 and Test 2 and 18 Jul with a tractor mounted boom equipped with a compressed air system calibrated to deliver 93.6 liters total spray/ha through Teejet X-12 hollow cone nozzles (2/row) at 3.02 kg/cm2. Plots were sampled on 22 (4 DAT) and 25 Jul (7 DAT). Treatment efficacy was evaluated by sampling the plant terminal (all apical shoot growth above and including the first fully expanded leaf). Fifteen and 10 samples on 4 DAT and 7 DAT, respectively, were collected from each plot and held in glass jars. Aphids were washed from the plant foliage onto 300 mesh wire sieves, backwashed onto ruled filter paper (7 cm) and counted using a binocular dissecting scope. These tests received 0.9 cm rainfall on 18 Jul and 1.8 cm rainfall on 19 Jul.","PeriodicalId":13691,"journal":{"name":"Insecticide and Acaricide Tests","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cotton Aphid Control in the Macon Ridge Region of Louisiana, 1991\",\"authors\":\"B. R. Leonard, J. Graves, D. Long\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/iat/18.1.239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Two tests were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of selected insecticides against cotton aphids in non-irrigated cotton planted 17 Apr. For both tests, plots consisted of 4 rows (102 cm centers) x 15 m. Treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with 4 replications. The test field had been treated previously with Ammo 2.5 EC (0.033 kg [AI]/ha) to stimulate cotton aphid infestations. Insecticides were applied to Test 1 and Test 2 and 18 Jul with a tractor mounted boom equipped with a compressed air system calibrated to deliver 93.6 liters total spray/ha through Teejet X-12 hollow cone nozzles (2/row) at 3.02 kg/cm2. Plots were sampled on 22 (4 DAT) and 25 Jul (7 DAT). Treatment efficacy was evaluated by sampling the plant terminal (all apical shoot growth above and including the first fully expanded leaf). Fifteen and 10 samples on 4 DAT and 7 DAT, respectively, were collected from each plot and held in glass jars. Aphids were washed from the plant foliage onto 300 mesh wire sieves, backwashed onto ruled filter paper (7 cm) and counted using a binocular dissecting scope. These tests received 0.9 cm rainfall on 18 Jul and 1.8 cm rainfall on 19 Jul.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insecticide and Acaricide Tests\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insecticide and Acaricide Tests\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/iat/18.1.239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insecticide and Acaricide Tests","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/iat/18.1.239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在4月17日种植的非灌溉棉花上进行了两项试验,以评价所选杀虫剂对棉花蚜虫的防治效果。两项试验均为4行(中心102 cm) × 15 m。处理采用随机完全区组设计,每组4个重复。在此之前,试验田用Ammo 2.5 EC (0.033 kg [AI]/ha)刺激棉蚜的发生。在试验1、试验2及7月18日,我们使用拖拉机吊具投放杀虫剂,吊具装有压缩空气系统,经校正后可透过Teejet X-12空心锥形喷嘴(每排2个)以3.02 kg/cm2的速度投放93.6升总喷雾量/公顷。取样时间分别为7月22日(4个DAT)和7月25日(7个DAT)。通过对植株顶梢(包括第一片完全展开的叶片在内的所有顶芽生长)取样来评价处理效果。每个地块在4日和7日分别采集15个和10个样本,保存在玻璃罐中。将蚜虫从植物叶片上冲洗到300目丝网筛子上,反冲洗到7厘米的横条滤纸上,并使用双目解剖镜计数。这些试验在7月18日和7月19日分别获得0.9 cm和1.8 cm的降雨量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cotton Aphid Control in the Macon Ridge Region of Louisiana, 1991
Two tests were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of selected insecticides against cotton aphids in non-irrigated cotton planted 17 Apr. For both tests, plots consisted of 4 rows (102 cm centers) x 15 m. Treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with 4 replications. The test field had been treated previously with Ammo 2.5 EC (0.033 kg [AI]/ha) to stimulate cotton aphid infestations. Insecticides were applied to Test 1 and Test 2 and 18 Jul with a tractor mounted boom equipped with a compressed air system calibrated to deliver 93.6 liters total spray/ha through Teejet X-12 hollow cone nozzles (2/row) at 3.02 kg/cm2. Plots were sampled on 22 (4 DAT) and 25 Jul (7 DAT). Treatment efficacy was evaluated by sampling the plant terminal (all apical shoot growth above and including the first fully expanded leaf). Fifteen and 10 samples on 4 DAT and 7 DAT, respectively, were collected from each plot and held in glass jars. Aphids were washed from the plant foliage onto 300 mesh wire sieves, backwashed onto ruled filter paper (7 cm) and counted using a binocular dissecting scope. These tests received 0.9 cm rainfall on 18 Jul and 1.8 cm rainfall on 19 Jul.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信