欧盟有机农业的制度发展

IF 1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Mirela Tomaš Simin, D. Milić, M. Petrović, Danica Glavaš-Trbić, B. Komaromi, Katarina Katarina Durić
{"title":"欧盟有机农业的制度发展","authors":"Mirela Tomaš Simin, D. Milić, M. Petrović, Danica Glavaš-Trbić, B. Komaromi, Katarina Katarina Durić","doi":"10.35784/pe.2023.1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of sustainable development has been attracting the attention of the scientific and professional community for decades. Various researches and papers focused on the concept of sustainability, exploring it through the prism of the economic, ecological and social subsystem. In this paper, the authors focus on agriculture and its sustainability. Starting from the assumption that organic farming is a sustainable system production, the authors turn to institutional support, trying to find a link between EU agricultural policy (CAP) and the growth of areas in organic agriculture. The research showed that this kind of support system failed to play the role that was intended for it and did not lead to mass acceptance of organic agriculture everywhere. Authors on the example of Denmark, Germany and Italy show the extent to which state support has influenced the expansion of areas under this system. Also, the comparison with the US agricultural policy leads to the conclusion that support policies for organic production constructed on a one-dimensional focus of payments per unit area will not lead to the expected results in terms of further progress and development of the organic sector.","PeriodicalId":44696,"journal":{"name":"Problemy Ekorozwoju","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional Development of Organic Farming in the EU\",\"authors\":\"Mirela Tomaš Simin, D. Milić, M. Petrović, Danica Glavaš-Trbić, B. Komaromi, Katarina Katarina Durić\",\"doi\":\"10.35784/pe.2023.1.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The concept of sustainable development has been attracting the attention of the scientific and professional community for decades. Various researches and papers focused on the concept of sustainability, exploring it through the prism of the economic, ecological and social subsystem. In this paper, the authors focus on agriculture and its sustainability. Starting from the assumption that organic farming is a sustainable system production, the authors turn to institutional support, trying to find a link between EU agricultural policy (CAP) and the growth of areas in organic agriculture. The research showed that this kind of support system failed to play the role that was intended for it and did not lead to mass acceptance of organic agriculture everywhere. Authors on the example of Denmark, Germany and Italy show the extent to which state support has influenced the expansion of areas under this system. Also, the comparison with the US agricultural policy leads to the conclusion that support policies for organic production constructed on a one-dimensional focus of payments per unit area will not lead to the expected results in terms of further progress and development of the organic sector.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Problemy Ekorozwoju\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Problemy Ekorozwoju\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2023.1.12\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problemy Ekorozwoju","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2023.1.12","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

几十年来,可持续发展的概念一直吸引着科学界和专业人士的关注。各种各样的研究和论文都集中在可持续发展的概念上,通过经济、生态和社会子系统的棱镜来探索它。在本文中,作者的重点是农业及其可持续性。从有机农业是一种可持续的系统生产的假设出发,作者转向制度支持,试图找到欧盟农业政策(CAP)与有机农业地区增长之间的联系。研究表明,这种支持系统没有发挥应有的作用,也没有导致各地对有机农业的大规模接受。作者以丹麦、德国和意大利为例,展示了国家支持对该体系下地区扩张的影响程度。同时,通过与美国农业政策的比较得出结论,在有机产业的进一步进步和发展方面,建立在单位面积支付的单一维度上的有机生产支持政策并不会取得预期的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Institutional Development of Organic Farming in the EU
The concept of sustainable development has been attracting the attention of the scientific and professional community for decades. Various researches and papers focused on the concept of sustainability, exploring it through the prism of the economic, ecological and social subsystem. In this paper, the authors focus on agriculture and its sustainability. Starting from the assumption that organic farming is a sustainable system production, the authors turn to institutional support, trying to find a link between EU agricultural policy (CAP) and the growth of areas in organic agriculture. The research showed that this kind of support system failed to play the role that was intended for it and did not lead to mass acceptance of organic agriculture everywhere. Authors on the example of Denmark, Germany and Italy show the extent to which state support has influenced the expansion of areas under this system. Also, the comparison with the US agricultural policy leads to the conclusion that support policies for organic production constructed on a one-dimensional focus of payments per unit area will not lead to the expected results in terms of further progress and development of the organic sector.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Problemy Ekorozwoju
Problemy Ekorozwoju ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
55
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信