对被忽视的热带病进行临床试验的挑战

M. Rebollo, M. Bockarie
{"title":"对被忽视的热带病进行临床试验的挑战","authors":"M. Rebollo, M. Bockarie","doi":"10.4155/CLI.15.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical research involving human subjects is driven mainly by the availability of novel products, devices or interventions that require further investigations to determine their safety and efficacy. The designs of clinical trials are critical to ensuring scientific validity and reproducibility of the results and it is essential that ethical approval is obtained by well-informed ethical committees in all participating countries. The WHO has developed a roadmap for 17 poverty related diseases, collectively called neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) [1]. However, the WHO focus NTDs do not include malaria, HIV/AIDs and tuberculosis which account for nearly two-thirds of all R&D funding associated with poverty related or neglected diseases. According to the 2014 G-FINDER survey report [2], in 2013, US$3.2 billion were invested in R&D for 132 poverty related diseases referred to as ‘neglected diseases’ [2]. The investment targeted 138 products that included drugs, vaccines, diagnostics, microbicides and vector control products. The big three diseases, HIV/AIDS, malaria and TB received 69% of the global neglected disease R&D funding and less than 10% was invested in the WHO focus NTDs. Of the US$2.1 billion contributed by the public sector, over US$2 billion were provided by high income countries (HIC) that influenced the diseases to focus on. This may partly explain the huge disparity between funding for the big three diseases and the 17 WHO focus NTDs. Nevertheless, in 2012 and 2014, 22 partners from the public and private sectors, including WHO, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, pharmaceutical companies and the US and UK governments committed through the London Declaration on NTDs ‘to advance R&D through partnerships and provision of funding to find nextgeneration treatments and interventions for neglected diseases’ [3]. Many of the WHO focus NTDs are considered tools ready, and targeted for eradication or elimination by 2020 [1]. These include Guinea worm disease, lymphatic filariasis, leprosy, human African trypanosomiasis and blinding trachoma. Other focus NTDs including schistosomiasis, soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH), Chagas disease, visceral leishmaniasis and river blindness (onchocerciasis) are targeted for control as a public health problem by 2020. Alternative intervention strategies based on new drugs, vaccines and novel devices have been proposed as additional tools that could fast-track the fight against NTDs [4–7]. However, many challenges exist for the conduct of clinical trials that will determine the safety and efficacy of the proposed new products and interventions. NTDs are diseases of neglected people living in lowand middle-income countries (LMIC) with little influence over the allocation of the substantial R&D funding required for the development of new products for “Making an investment case for the R&D for vaccines of tool ready diseases have been challenging but researchers advocating for new products, including vaccines, are aware of these challenges and the low priority given to diseases that are amenable to the WHO preventive chemotherapy strategy.”","PeriodicalId":10369,"journal":{"name":"Clinical investigation","volume":"44 1","pages":"535-537"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The challenges of conducting clinical trials for neglected tropical diseases\",\"authors\":\"M. Rebollo, M. Bockarie\",\"doi\":\"10.4155/CLI.15.24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clinical research involving human subjects is driven mainly by the availability of novel products, devices or interventions that require further investigations to determine their safety and efficacy. The designs of clinical trials are critical to ensuring scientific validity and reproducibility of the results and it is essential that ethical approval is obtained by well-informed ethical committees in all participating countries. The WHO has developed a roadmap for 17 poverty related diseases, collectively called neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) [1]. However, the WHO focus NTDs do not include malaria, HIV/AIDs and tuberculosis which account for nearly two-thirds of all R&D funding associated with poverty related or neglected diseases. According to the 2014 G-FINDER survey report [2], in 2013, US$3.2 billion were invested in R&D for 132 poverty related diseases referred to as ‘neglected diseases’ [2]. The investment targeted 138 products that included drugs, vaccines, diagnostics, microbicides and vector control products. The big three diseases, HIV/AIDS, malaria and TB received 69% of the global neglected disease R&D funding and less than 10% was invested in the WHO focus NTDs. Of the US$2.1 billion contributed by the public sector, over US$2 billion were provided by high income countries (HIC) that influenced the diseases to focus on. This may partly explain the huge disparity between funding for the big three diseases and the 17 WHO focus NTDs. Nevertheless, in 2012 and 2014, 22 partners from the public and private sectors, including WHO, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, pharmaceutical companies and the US and UK governments committed through the London Declaration on NTDs ‘to advance R&D through partnerships and provision of funding to find nextgeneration treatments and interventions for neglected diseases’ [3]. Many of the WHO focus NTDs are considered tools ready, and targeted for eradication or elimination by 2020 [1]. These include Guinea worm disease, lymphatic filariasis, leprosy, human African trypanosomiasis and blinding trachoma. Other focus NTDs including schistosomiasis, soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH), Chagas disease, visceral leishmaniasis and river blindness (onchocerciasis) are targeted for control as a public health problem by 2020. Alternative intervention strategies based on new drugs, vaccines and novel devices have been proposed as additional tools that could fast-track the fight against NTDs [4–7]. However, many challenges exist for the conduct of clinical trials that will determine the safety and efficacy of the proposed new products and interventions. NTDs are diseases of neglected people living in lowand middle-income countries (LMIC) with little influence over the allocation of the substantial R&D funding required for the development of new products for “Making an investment case for the R&D for vaccines of tool ready diseases have been challenging but researchers advocating for new products, including vaccines, are aware of these challenges and the low priority given to diseases that are amenable to the WHO preventive chemotherapy strategy.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":10369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical investigation\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"535-537\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4155/CLI.15.24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical investigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4155/CLI.15.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

涉及人类受试者的临床研究主要是由新产品、设备或干预措施的可用性驱动的,这些新产品、设备或干预措施需要进一步调查以确定其安全性和有效性。临床试验的设计对于确保结果的科学有效性和可重复性至关重要,所有参与国知情的伦理委员会都必须获得伦理批准。世界卫生组织为17种与贫困有关的疾病制定了一份路线图,这些疾病统称为被忽视的热带病[1]。然而,世卫组织关注的被忽视热带病不包括疟疾、艾滋病毒/艾滋病和结核病,这些疾病占与贫困相关或被忽视疾病相关的所有研发资金的近三分之二。根据2014年G-FINDER调查报告[2],2013年,在与贫困有关的132种被称为“被忽视的疾病”的研发上投入了32亿美元[2]。这项投资针对138种产品,包括药物、疫苗、诊断、杀微生物剂和病媒控制产品。艾滋病毒/艾滋病、疟疾和结核病这三大疾病获得了全球被忽视疾病研发资金的69%,而投向世卫组织重点被忽视热带病的资金不到10%。在公共部门提供的21亿美元中,高收入国家提供了20多亿美元,这些国家影响了重点关注的疾病。这可能在一定程度上解释了为三大疾病提供的资金与世卫组织重点关注的17个被忽视热带病之间的巨大差距。然而,在2012年和2014年,来自公共和私营部门的22个合作伙伴,包括世卫组织、比尔及梅林达·盖茨基金会、制药公司以及美国和英国政府,通过《被忽视疾病伦敦宣言》承诺“通过伙伴关系和提供资金来推动研发,以寻找被忽视疾病的下一代治疗和干预措施”[3]。世卫组织的许多重点被忽视热带病被认为是现成的工具,目标是到2020年根除或消除[1]。这些疾病包括麦地那龙线虫病、淋巴丝虫病、麻风病、非洲人类锥虫病和致盲性沙眼。其他重点被忽视热带病包括血吸虫病、土壤传播蠕虫病、恰加斯病、内脏利什曼病和河盲症(盘尾丝虫病),是到2020年作为公共卫生问题加以控制的目标。已经提出了基于新药、疫苗和新设备的替代干预策略,作为可以快速对抗被忽视热带病的额外工具[4-7]。然而,在进行临床试验以确定拟议的新产品和干预措施的安全性和有效性方面存在许多挑战。被忽视的热带病是生活在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)的被忽视人群的疾病,对开发新产品所需的大量研发资金的分配几乎没有影响,用于"为工具型疾病疫苗的研发提供投资理由一直具有挑战性,但倡导包括疫苗在内的新产品的研究人员,我们意识到这些挑战,也意识到对适于世卫组织预防性化疗战略的疾病重视程度较低。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The challenges of conducting clinical trials for neglected tropical diseases
Clinical research involving human subjects is driven mainly by the availability of novel products, devices or interventions that require further investigations to determine their safety and efficacy. The designs of clinical trials are critical to ensuring scientific validity and reproducibility of the results and it is essential that ethical approval is obtained by well-informed ethical committees in all participating countries. The WHO has developed a roadmap for 17 poverty related diseases, collectively called neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) [1]. However, the WHO focus NTDs do not include malaria, HIV/AIDs and tuberculosis which account for nearly two-thirds of all R&D funding associated with poverty related or neglected diseases. According to the 2014 G-FINDER survey report [2], in 2013, US$3.2 billion were invested in R&D for 132 poverty related diseases referred to as ‘neglected diseases’ [2]. The investment targeted 138 products that included drugs, vaccines, diagnostics, microbicides and vector control products. The big three diseases, HIV/AIDS, malaria and TB received 69% of the global neglected disease R&D funding and less than 10% was invested in the WHO focus NTDs. Of the US$2.1 billion contributed by the public sector, over US$2 billion were provided by high income countries (HIC) that influenced the diseases to focus on. This may partly explain the huge disparity between funding for the big three diseases and the 17 WHO focus NTDs. Nevertheless, in 2012 and 2014, 22 partners from the public and private sectors, including WHO, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, pharmaceutical companies and the US and UK governments committed through the London Declaration on NTDs ‘to advance R&D through partnerships and provision of funding to find nextgeneration treatments and interventions for neglected diseases’ [3]. Many of the WHO focus NTDs are considered tools ready, and targeted for eradication or elimination by 2020 [1]. These include Guinea worm disease, lymphatic filariasis, leprosy, human African trypanosomiasis and blinding trachoma. Other focus NTDs including schistosomiasis, soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH), Chagas disease, visceral leishmaniasis and river blindness (onchocerciasis) are targeted for control as a public health problem by 2020. Alternative intervention strategies based on new drugs, vaccines and novel devices have been proposed as additional tools that could fast-track the fight against NTDs [4–7]. However, many challenges exist for the conduct of clinical trials that will determine the safety and efficacy of the proposed new products and interventions. NTDs are diseases of neglected people living in lowand middle-income countries (LMIC) with little influence over the allocation of the substantial R&D funding required for the development of new products for “Making an investment case for the R&D for vaccines of tool ready diseases have been challenging but researchers advocating for new products, including vaccines, are aware of these challenges and the low priority given to diseases that are amenable to the WHO preventive chemotherapy strategy.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信