探索建筑环境中的微生物群:建筑专业人员可使用的四种生物方法的入门

Andrew J. Hoisington, J. P. Maestre, J. Siegel, K. Kinney
{"title":"探索建筑环境中的微生物群:建筑专业人员可使用的四种生物方法的入门","authors":"Andrew J. Hoisington, J. P. Maestre, J. Siegel, K. Kinney","doi":"10.1080/10789669.2013.840524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building professionals are increasingly being called upon to conduct indoor microbial investigations as they remediate moisture-damaged buildings and design new, healthy, sustainable buildings. Characterizing the indoor microbial community present in the built environment is challenging and complicated by the vast array of biological methods available to building professionals. Furthermore, the particular biological technique employed to study an indoor environment can have a significant impact on the results obtained. This study evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of four biological methods suitable for indoor microbial investigations: culturing, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), Sanger sequencing, and pyrosequencing. The results obtained from a study of four buildings are used to evaluate the merits of each bioanalytical approach. In each of the four study sites, the microbial-laden dust recovered on HVAC filters was used to provide a passive, long-term sample of the indoor air. Culturing of the microorganisms recovered from the dust was the least expensive method tested but provided a limited characterization of the microbial community present. qPCR provided the most specific information about the presence and quantity of target microorganisms but this method requires a priori knowledge of the species of interest and specifically designed primers that may not enumerate unanticipated species. Sanger sequencing provided microbial identification at the species level but lacked coverage to fully describe the microbial community present. Pyrosequencing provided in-depth sequence coverage of the microbial community present (to the genus level) but the vast dataset generated required increased computational analysis and data storage. Nevertheless, pyrosequencing when coupled with qPCR for target species quantification represents a viable approach that should become more accessible to building professionals as user-friendly software for analyzing sequencing results becomes available and more commercial laboratories offer these services.","PeriodicalId":13238,"journal":{"name":"HVAC&R Research","volume":"9 1","pages":"167 - 175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the microbiome of the built environment: A primer on four biological methods available to building professionals\",\"authors\":\"Andrew J. Hoisington, J. P. Maestre, J. Siegel, K. Kinney\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10789669.2013.840524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Building professionals are increasingly being called upon to conduct indoor microbial investigations as they remediate moisture-damaged buildings and design new, healthy, sustainable buildings. Characterizing the indoor microbial community present in the built environment is challenging and complicated by the vast array of biological methods available to building professionals. Furthermore, the particular biological technique employed to study an indoor environment can have a significant impact on the results obtained. This study evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of four biological methods suitable for indoor microbial investigations: culturing, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), Sanger sequencing, and pyrosequencing. The results obtained from a study of four buildings are used to evaluate the merits of each bioanalytical approach. In each of the four study sites, the microbial-laden dust recovered on HVAC filters was used to provide a passive, long-term sample of the indoor air. Culturing of the microorganisms recovered from the dust was the least expensive method tested but provided a limited characterization of the microbial community present. qPCR provided the most specific information about the presence and quantity of target microorganisms but this method requires a priori knowledge of the species of interest and specifically designed primers that may not enumerate unanticipated species. Sanger sequencing provided microbial identification at the species level but lacked coverage to fully describe the microbial community present. Pyrosequencing provided in-depth sequence coverage of the microbial community present (to the genus level) but the vast dataset generated required increased computational analysis and data storage. Nevertheless, pyrosequencing when coupled with qPCR for target species quantification represents a viable approach that should become more accessible to building professionals as user-friendly software for analyzing sequencing results becomes available and more commercial laboratories offer these services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HVAC&R Research\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"167 - 175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HVAC&R Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10789669.2013.840524\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HVAC&R Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10789669.2013.840524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

建筑专业人员越来越多地被要求进行室内微生物调查,因为他们修复潮湿受损的建筑和设计新的、健康的、可持续的建筑。表征建筑环境中存在的室内微生物群落是具有挑战性的,并且由于建筑专业人员可用的大量生物方法而变得复杂。此外,用于研究室内环境的特定生物技术可能对所获得的结果产生重大影响。本研究对培养、定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)、桑格测序和焦磷酸测序四种适合室内微生物研究的生物学方法的优缺点进行了评价。从四座建筑物的研究中获得的结果用于评估每种生物分析方法的优点。在每一个研究地点,从暖通空调过滤器上回收的含有微生物的灰尘被用来提供被动的、长期的室内空气样本。从灰尘中回收的微生物的培养是所测试的最便宜的方法,但提供了有限的微生物群落特征。qPCR提供了关于目标微生物的存在和数量的最具体的信息,但这种方法需要对感兴趣的物种有先验的了解,并且需要专门设计的引物,这些引物可能不会枚举未预料到的物种。Sanger测序提供了物种水平的微生物鉴定,但缺乏覆盖范围,无法全面描述微生物群落。焦磷酸测序提供了微生物群落的深度序列覆盖(到属水平),但产生的庞大数据集需要增加计算分析和数据存储。然而,焦磷酸测序与qPCR结合用于目标物种定量是一种可行的方法,随着分析测序结果的用户友好软件的出现和更多商业实验室提供这些服务,这种方法应该更容易为建筑专业人员所接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the microbiome of the built environment: A primer on four biological methods available to building professionals
Building professionals are increasingly being called upon to conduct indoor microbial investigations as they remediate moisture-damaged buildings and design new, healthy, sustainable buildings. Characterizing the indoor microbial community present in the built environment is challenging and complicated by the vast array of biological methods available to building professionals. Furthermore, the particular biological technique employed to study an indoor environment can have a significant impact on the results obtained. This study evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of four biological methods suitable for indoor microbial investigations: culturing, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), Sanger sequencing, and pyrosequencing. The results obtained from a study of four buildings are used to evaluate the merits of each bioanalytical approach. In each of the four study sites, the microbial-laden dust recovered on HVAC filters was used to provide a passive, long-term sample of the indoor air. Culturing of the microorganisms recovered from the dust was the least expensive method tested but provided a limited characterization of the microbial community present. qPCR provided the most specific information about the presence and quantity of target microorganisms but this method requires a priori knowledge of the species of interest and specifically designed primers that may not enumerate unanticipated species. Sanger sequencing provided microbial identification at the species level but lacked coverage to fully describe the microbial community present. Pyrosequencing provided in-depth sequence coverage of the microbial community present (to the genus level) but the vast dataset generated required increased computational analysis and data storage. Nevertheless, pyrosequencing when coupled with qPCR for target species quantification represents a viable approach that should become more accessible to building professionals as user-friendly software for analyzing sequencing results becomes available and more commercial laboratories offer these services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HVAC&R Research
HVAC&R Research 工程技术-工程:机械
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信