血浆 Aβ 作为预测阿尔茨海默病 Aβ-PET 状态的生物标志物:系统回顾与荟萃分析。

IF 0.9 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Archaeological Journal Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2022-03-03 DOI:10.1136/jnnp-2021-327864
Lizhen Cheng, Wei Li, Yixin Chen, Yijia Lin, Beiyun Wang, Qihao Guo, Ya Miao
{"title":"血浆 Aβ 作为预测阿尔茨海默病 Aβ-PET 状态的生物标志物:系统回顾与荟萃分析。","authors":"Lizhen Cheng, Wei Li, Yixin Chen, Yijia Lin, Beiyun Wang, Qihao Guo, Ya Miao","doi":"10.1136/jnnp-2021-327864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Amyloid-β positron emission tomography (Aβ-PET) scan has been proposed to detect amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition in the brain. However, this approach is costly and not ideal for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Blood-based Aβ measurement offers a scalable alternative to the costly or invasive biomarkers. The aim of this study was to statistically validate whether plasma Aβ could predict Aβ-PET status via meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched for eligible studies from PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library, which reported plasma Aβ levels of amyloid-β positron emission tomography-positive (PET (+)) and amyloid-β positron emission tomography-negative (PET (-)) subjects. We generated pooled estimates using random effects meta-analyses. For any study that has significant heterogeneity, metaregression and subgroup analysis were further conducted. Publication bias was appraised by funnel plots and Egger's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>16 studies with 3047 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Among all the enrolled studies, 10 studies reported plasma Aβ40 values, while 9 studies reported plasma Aβ42 values and 13 studies reported Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio. The pooled standardised mean difference (SMD) was 0.76 (95% CI -0.61 to 2.14, p=0.28) in the plasma Aβ40 values group. Plasma Aβ42 values group has a pooled SMD of -0.60 (95% CI -0.80 to -0.41, p<0.0001). In the plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio group, the pooled SMD was -1.44 (95% CI -2.17 to -0.72, p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Plasma Aβ40 values might not distinguish between PET (+) and PET (-) people. However, plasma Aβ42 values and plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio could be served as independent biomarkers for predicting Aβ-PET status.</p>","PeriodicalId":44491,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Journal","volume":"141 1","pages":"513-520"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9016262/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plasma Aβ as a biomarker for predicting Aβ-PET status in Alzheimer's disease:a systematic review with meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Lizhen Cheng, Wei Li, Yixin Chen, Yijia Lin, Beiyun Wang, Qihao Guo, Ya Miao\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jnnp-2021-327864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Amyloid-β positron emission tomography (Aβ-PET) scan has been proposed to detect amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition in the brain. However, this approach is costly and not ideal for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Blood-based Aβ measurement offers a scalable alternative to the costly or invasive biomarkers. The aim of this study was to statistically validate whether plasma Aβ could predict Aβ-PET status via meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched for eligible studies from PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library, which reported plasma Aβ levels of amyloid-β positron emission tomography-positive (PET (+)) and amyloid-β positron emission tomography-negative (PET (-)) subjects. We generated pooled estimates using random effects meta-analyses. For any study that has significant heterogeneity, metaregression and subgroup analysis were further conducted. Publication bias was appraised by funnel plots and Egger's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>16 studies with 3047 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Among all the enrolled studies, 10 studies reported plasma Aβ40 values, while 9 studies reported plasma Aβ42 values and 13 studies reported Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio. The pooled standardised mean difference (SMD) was 0.76 (95% CI -0.61 to 2.14, p=0.28) in the plasma Aβ40 values group. Plasma Aβ42 values group has a pooled SMD of -0.60 (95% CI -0.80 to -0.41, p<0.0001). In the plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio group, the pooled SMD was -1.44 (95% CI -2.17 to -0.72, p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Plasma Aβ40 values might not distinguish between PET (+) and PET (-) people. However, plasma Aβ42 values and plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio could be served as independent biomarkers for predicting Aβ-PET status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeological Journal\",\"volume\":\"141 1\",\"pages\":\"513-520\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9016262/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeological Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2021-327864\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/3/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2021-327864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的淀粉样蛋白-β正电子发射断层扫描(Aβ-PET)被提议用于检测大脑中的淀粉样蛋白-β(Aβ)沉积。然而,这种方法成本高昂,而且对于阿尔茨海默病的早期诊断并不理想。基于血液的 Aβ 测量为昂贵的侵入性生物标记物提供了一种可扩展的替代方法。本研究旨在通过荟萃分析对血浆 Aβ 是否能预测 Aβ-PET 状态进行统计验证:方法:我们从PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆系统检索了符合条件的研究,这些研究报告了淀粉样蛋白-β正电子发射断层扫描阳性(PET (+))和淀粉样蛋白-β正电子发射断层扫描阴性(PET (-))受试者的血浆Aβ水平。我们使用随机效应荟萃分析法得出了汇总估计值。对于存在明显异质性的研究,我们进一步进行了元回归和亚组分析。通过漏斗图和 Egger 检验对发表偏倚进行评估:荟萃分析纳入了 16 项研究,共有 3047 名参与者。在所有纳入的研究中,10 项研究报告了血浆 Aβ40 值,9 项研究报告了血浆 Aβ42 值,13 项研究报告了 Aβ42/Aβ40 比值。血浆Aβ40值组的汇总标准化平均差(SMD)为0.76(95% CI -0.61至2.14,P=0.28)。血浆 Aβ42 值组的集合 SMD 为-0.60(95% CI -0.80 至 -0.41,P=0.28):血浆 Aβ40 值可能无法区分 PET(+)和 PET(-)人群。然而,血浆Aβ42值和血浆Aβ42/Aβ40比值可作为预测Aβ-PET状态的独立生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Plasma Aβ as a biomarker for predicting Aβ-PET status in Alzheimer's disease:a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Objective: Amyloid-β positron emission tomography (Aβ-PET) scan has been proposed to detect amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition in the brain. However, this approach is costly and not ideal for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Blood-based Aβ measurement offers a scalable alternative to the costly or invasive biomarkers. The aim of this study was to statistically validate whether plasma Aβ could predict Aβ-PET status via meta-analysis.

Methods: We systematically searched for eligible studies from PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library, which reported plasma Aβ levels of amyloid-β positron emission tomography-positive (PET (+)) and amyloid-β positron emission tomography-negative (PET (-)) subjects. We generated pooled estimates using random effects meta-analyses. For any study that has significant heterogeneity, metaregression and subgroup analysis were further conducted. Publication bias was appraised by funnel plots and Egger's test.

Results: 16 studies with 3047 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Among all the enrolled studies, 10 studies reported plasma Aβ40 values, while 9 studies reported plasma Aβ42 values and 13 studies reported Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio. The pooled standardised mean difference (SMD) was 0.76 (95% CI -0.61 to 2.14, p=0.28) in the plasma Aβ40 values group. Plasma Aβ42 values group has a pooled SMD of -0.60 (95% CI -0.80 to -0.41, p<0.0001). In the plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio group, the pooled SMD was -1.44 (95% CI -2.17 to -0.72, p<0.0001).

Conclusion: Plasma Aβ40 values might not distinguish between PET (+) and PET (-) people. However, plasma Aβ42 values and plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio could be served as independent biomarkers for predicting Aβ-PET status.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archaeological Journal
Archaeological Journal ARCHAEOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信