特定领域对Facebook的影响:在评估四个国家有影响力的账户时,主题是如何起作用的

Camila Mont’Alverne, Amy A. Ross Arguedas, Sumitra Badrinathan, Benjamin Toff, R. Fletcher, Rasmus Kleis Nielsen
{"title":"特定领域对Facebook的影响:在评估四个国家有影响力的账户时,主题是如何起作用的","authors":"Camila Mont’Alverne, Amy A. Ross Arguedas, Sumitra Badrinathan, Benjamin Toff, R. Fletcher, Rasmus Kleis Nielsen","doi":"10.51685/jqd.2023.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Against the backdrop of rising concern over misinformation and disinformation, a growing number of studies have considered the important role played by influential social media accounts when particular news stories attract attention online—with special attention given to Facebook, the most widely-used social network for news. However, little is known about what kinds of accounts are among the most influential information curators on Facebook, and where news organizations fit into this broader landscape. In this study, we examine how influence on Facebook plays out across different national contexts and different topics. We draw on a unique dataset from CrowdTangle, sampling over a six-month period in 2021 across four countries (Brazil, India, the United Kingdom, and the United States). We compare what kinds of sources (e.g., news organizations, politicians, or other kinds of influential accounts and groups) are among the most influential accounts in each location when it comes to three specific subjects: COVID-19, political leaders in each country, and climate change—which we also compare to general queries that do not specify a subject domain. Our findings show that the types of influential accounts on Facebook vary considerably by subject domain and country. News media accounts are among the largest share of these influential accounts in each country, but not necessarily the types of news media organizations presumed to be most influential offline.","PeriodicalId":93587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quantitative description: digital media","volume":"193 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Domain-specific influence on Facebook: How topic matters when assessing influential accounts in four countries\",\"authors\":\"Camila Mont’Alverne, Amy A. Ross Arguedas, Sumitra Badrinathan, Benjamin Toff, R. Fletcher, Rasmus Kleis Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.51685/jqd.2023.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Against the backdrop of rising concern over misinformation and disinformation, a growing number of studies have considered the important role played by influential social media accounts when particular news stories attract attention online—with special attention given to Facebook, the most widely-used social network for news. However, little is known about what kinds of accounts are among the most influential information curators on Facebook, and where news organizations fit into this broader landscape. In this study, we examine how influence on Facebook plays out across different national contexts and different topics. We draw on a unique dataset from CrowdTangle, sampling over a six-month period in 2021 across four countries (Brazil, India, the United Kingdom, and the United States). We compare what kinds of sources (e.g., news organizations, politicians, or other kinds of influential accounts and groups) are among the most influential accounts in each location when it comes to three specific subjects: COVID-19, political leaders in each country, and climate change—which we also compare to general queries that do not specify a subject domain. Our findings show that the types of influential accounts on Facebook vary considerably by subject domain and country. News media accounts are among the largest share of these influential accounts in each country, but not necessarily the types of news media organizations presumed to be most influential offline.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of quantitative description: digital media\",\"volume\":\"193 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of quantitative description: digital media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2023.014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of quantitative description: digital media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2023.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在对错误信息和虚假信息日益关注的背景下,越来越多的研究考虑到当特定新闻故事在网上引起关注时,有影响力的社交媒体账户所起的重要作用,其中特别关注的是使用最广泛的新闻社交网络Facebook。然而,对于Facebook上最有影响力的信息管理者中有哪些账户,以及新闻机构在这一更广泛的格局中处于何种地位,人们知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们研究了对Facebook的影响如何在不同的国家背景和不同的主题中发挥作用。我们利用了CrowdTangle的独特数据集,在2021年的六个月时间里对四个国家(巴西、印度、英国和美国)进行了采样。当涉及三个特定主题时,我们比较了哪些类型的来源(例如,新闻机构,政治家或其他类型的有影响力的账户和团体)是每个地区最具影响力的账户:COVID-19,每个国家的政治领导人和气候变化-我们也将其与未指定主题领域的一般查询进行比较。我们的研究结果表明,Facebook上有影响力的账户类型因学科领域和国家而有很大差异。在每个国家,新闻媒体账户在这些有影响力的账户中所占比例最大,但不一定是被认为在线下最有影响力的新闻媒体组织类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Domain-specific influence on Facebook: How topic matters when assessing influential accounts in four countries
Against the backdrop of rising concern over misinformation and disinformation, a growing number of studies have considered the important role played by influential social media accounts when particular news stories attract attention online—with special attention given to Facebook, the most widely-used social network for news. However, little is known about what kinds of accounts are among the most influential information curators on Facebook, and where news organizations fit into this broader landscape. In this study, we examine how influence on Facebook plays out across different national contexts and different topics. We draw on a unique dataset from CrowdTangle, sampling over a six-month period in 2021 across four countries (Brazil, India, the United Kingdom, and the United States). We compare what kinds of sources (e.g., news organizations, politicians, or other kinds of influential accounts and groups) are among the most influential accounts in each location when it comes to three specific subjects: COVID-19, political leaders in each country, and climate change—which we also compare to general queries that do not specify a subject domain. Our findings show that the types of influential accounts on Facebook vary considerably by subject domain and country. News media accounts are among the largest share of these influential accounts in each country, but not necessarily the types of news media organizations presumed to be most influential offline.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信