澳大利亚老年乳腺癌:筛查与症状性乳腺癌的肿瘤特征

Dr Adam Ofri, N. Bhimani, Dr Sanjay Warrier
{"title":"澳大利亚老年乳腺癌:筛查与症状性乳腺癌的肿瘤特征","authors":"Dr Adam Ofri, N. Bhimani, Dr Sanjay Warrier","doi":"10.29011/2574-710x.10126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Breast cancer is the most common non-skin cancer in Australia, affecting 1 in 7 women by the age of 85. The Australian 2020 projected incidence of breast cancer in the older population, 70 years or greater, is over 6500. This is almost a third of the entire projected incidence of over 20,000. BreastScreen Australia invites women aged 50-74 years of age for biennial screening; however, a significant proportion of Australian women continue screening well beyond this. We have evaluated the tumour characteristics of older breast cancer patients - comparing symptomatic to screen detected patients. Methods: This was a retrospective study of data from the BreastSurgANZ Quality Audit (BQA) between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2019. Female patients aged ≥ 70 at diagnosis were included only. Exclusion occurred for incompletely recorded cases. Patients were then divided based on means of detection - either screen detected (Group A) or symptomatic (Group B). Results: From 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2019, 34,258 patients were appropriately reported in the BQA. There were 11,021 in Group A and 23,237 in Group B. DCIS was more prevalent in Group A (16.83% versus 6.49%, p = <.001). T stage distribution was statistically different, with higher T stages for Group B, p = <.001. IDC sub-type distribution varied between the two groups, p = <.001. IDC Grade 3 and lymphovascular invasion were more common in Group B (p = <.001). Hormonal status was statistically different, with Group B having greater rates of TNBC and HER2+ cancers compared to Group A (12.99% versus 7.10%, p = <.001 and 4.45% versus 2.55%; respectively, p = <.001). Conclusion: This is the first BQA review of older breast cancer tumour characteristics, comparing screen to symptomatic patients. As hypothesized, screen detected cancers were smaller and earlier stage, compared to symptomatic patients. Tumour biology was statistically less favourable in Group B being higher grade, and greater rates of lymphovascular invasion, TNBC and HER2+ cancers.","PeriodicalId":73876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oncology research and therapy","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Older Breast Cancer in Australia: Tumour Characteristics of Screened Versus Symptomatic Breast Cancers\",\"authors\":\"Dr Adam Ofri, N. Bhimani, Dr Sanjay Warrier\",\"doi\":\"10.29011/2574-710x.10126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Breast cancer is the most common non-skin cancer in Australia, affecting 1 in 7 women by the age of 85. The Australian 2020 projected incidence of breast cancer in the older population, 70 years or greater, is over 6500. This is almost a third of the entire projected incidence of over 20,000. BreastScreen Australia invites women aged 50-74 years of age for biennial screening; however, a significant proportion of Australian women continue screening well beyond this. We have evaluated the tumour characteristics of older breast cancer patients - comparing symptomatic to screen detected patients. Methods: This was a retrospective study of data from the BreastSurgANZ Quality Audit (BQA) between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2019. Female patients aged ≥ 70 at diagnosis were included only. Exclusion occurred for incompletely recorded cases. Patients were then divided based on means of detection - either screen detected (Group A) or symptomatic (Group B). Results: From 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2019, 34,258 patients were appropriately reported in the BQA. There were 11,021 in Group A and 23,237 in Group B. DCIS was more prevalent in Group A (16.83% versus 6.49%, p = <.001). T stage distribution was statistically different, with higher T stages for Group B, p = <.001. IDC sub-type distribution varied between the two groups, p = <.001. IDC Grade 3 and lymphovascular invasion were more common in Group B (p = <.001). Hormonal status was statistically different, with Group B having greater rates of TNBC and HER2+ cancers compared to Group A (12.99% versus 7.10%, p = <.001 and 4.45% versus 2.55%; respectively, p = <.001). Conclusion: This is the first BQA review of older breast cancer tumour characteristics, comparing screen to symptomatic patients. As hypothesized, screen detected cancers were smaller and earlier stage, compared to symptomatic patients. Tumour biology was statistically less favourable in Group B being higher grade, and greater rates of lymphovascular invasion, TNBC and HER2+ cancers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of oncology research and therapy\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of oncology research and therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29011/2574-710x.10126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oncology research and therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29011/2574-710x.10126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:乳腺癌是澳大利亚最常见的非皮肤癌,到85岁时,每7名女性中就有1名患有乳腺癌。澳大利亚2020年预计70岁或以上的老年人口中乳腺癌的发病率超过6500。这几乎是整个预计发病率超过20,000的三分之一。澳大利亚乳房筛查协会邀请50-74岁的妇女参加两年一次的筛查;然而,相当大比例的澳大利亚妇女继续进行筛查。我们对老年乳腺癌患者的肿瘤特征进行了评估——将有症状的患者与筛查出的患者进行比较。方法:回顾性研究了2001年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间breastsuranz质量审计(BQA)的数据。仅纳入诊断时年龄≥70岁的女性患者。未完整记录的病例被排除在外。然后根据检测方式对患者进行分组-筛查检测(A组)或症状(B组)。结果:从2001年1月1日至2019年12月31日,在BQA中报告了34258例患者。A组11,021例,b组23,237例,A组DCIS发生率更高(16.83%比6.49%,p = < 0.001)。T分期分布差异有统计学意义,B组T分期较高,p = < 0.001。两组间IDC亚型分布差异有统计学意义,p = < 0.001。B组IDC 3级及淋巴血管侵犯发生率较高(p = < 0.001)。激素状况有统计学差异,B组TNBC和HER2+癌的发生率高于A组(12.99%比7.10%,p = <)。001和4.45%对2.55%;p = < 0.001)。结论:这是对老年乳腺癌肿瘤特征的首次BQA回顾,比较了筛查和有症状的患者。正如假设的那样,与有症状的患者相比,筛查出的癌症更小,处于早期阶段。B组的肿瘤生物学指标在统计学上较差,分级较高,淋巴血管侵袭、TNBC和HER2+癌的发生率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Older Breast Cancer in Australia: Tumour Characteristics of Screened Versus Symptomatic Breast Cancers
Background: Breast cancer is the most common non-skin cancer in Australia, affecting 1 in 7 women by the age of 85. The Australian 2020 projected incidence of breast cancer in the older population, 70 years or greater, is over 6500. This is almost a third of the entire projected incidence of over 20,000. BreastScreen Australia invites women aged 50-74 years of age for biennial screening; however, a significant proportion of Australian women continue screening well beyond this. We have evaluated the tumour characteristics of older breast cancer patients - comparing symptomatic to screen detected patients. Methods: This was a retrospective study of data from the BreastSurgANZ Quality Audit (BQA) between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2019. Female patients aged ≥ 70 at diagnosis were included only. Exclusion occurred for incompletely recorded cases. Patients were then divided based on means of detection - either screen detected (Group A) or symptomatic (Group B). Results: From 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2019, 34,258 patients were appropriately reported in the BQA. There were 11,021 in Group A and 23,237 in Group B. DCIS was more prevalent in Group A (16.83% versus 6.49%, p = <.001). T stage distribution was statistically different, with higher T stages for Group B, p = <.001. IDC sub-type distribution varied between the two groups, p = <.001. IDC Grade 3 and lymphovascular invasion were more common in Group B (p = <.001). Hormonal status was statistically different, with Group B having greater rates of TNBC and HER2+ cancers compared to Group A (12.99% versus 7.10%, p = <.001 and 4.45% versus 2.55%; respectively, p = <.001). Conclusion: This is the first BQA review of older breast cancer tumour characteristics, comparing screen to symptomatic patients. As hypothesized, screen detected cancers were smaller and earlier stage, compared to symptomatic patients. Tumour biology was statistically less favourable in Group B being higher grade, and greater rates of lymphovascular invasion, TNBC and HER2+ cancers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信