证据不会改变处方模式,那么是什么改变了呢?

A. Rida, A. Brooks
{"title":"证据不会改变处方模式,那么是什么改变了呢?","authors":"A. Rida, A. Brooks","doi":"10.22237/CRP/1553558520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors write in support of critical analysis of clinical research, as a corrective to the physician's urge to \"do something\" even when no evidence of benefit exists.","PeriodicalId":10422,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research In Practice: The Journal of Team Hippocrates","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence doesn’t change prescribing patterns…so what does?\",\"authors\":\"A. Rida, A. Brooks\",\"doi\":\"10.22237/CRP/1553558520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors write in support of critical analysis of clinical research, as a corrective to the physician's urge to \\\"do something\\\" even when no evidence of benefit exists.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Research In Practice: The Journal of Team Hippocrates\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Research In Practice: The Journal of Team Hippocrates\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22237/CRP/1553558520\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research In Practice: The Journal of Team Hippocrates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22237/CRP/1553558520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作者在文章中支持对临床研究进行批判性分析,以此纠正医生在没有证据表明有益的情况下也要“做点什么”的冲动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evidence doesn’t change prescribing patterns…so what does?
The authors write in support of critical analysis of clinical research, as a corrective to the physician's urge to "do something" even when no evidence of benefit exists.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信