去神秘化——一个评估真实世界有效性的解决方案?

F. Porzsolt, Christel Weiss, M. Weiss, K. Jauch, R. Kaplan
{"title":"去神秘化——一个评估真实世界有效性的解决方案?","authors":"F. Porzsolt, Christel Weiss, M. Weiss, K. Jauch, R. Kaplan","doi":"10.15761/TIM.1000231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nearly 100 years ago Archie Cochrane and Austin Bradford Hill proposed a three-dimensional assessment for evaluating clinical interventions: Can it Work? Does it work? Is it Worth it? [2, S1]. Table 1 proposes a strategy to answer these questions by description of three outcome dimensions that are assessed under two different conditions from three different perspectives. The strategy requires a different architecture of studies (form and function) and different tools.","PeriodicalId":23337,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demystification – a solution for assessment of real-world effective-ness?\",\"authors\":\"F. Porzsolt, Christel Weiss, M. Weiss, K. Jauch, R. Kaplan\",\"doi\":\"10.15761/TIM.1000231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nearly 100 years ago Archie Cochrane and Austin Bradford Hill proposed a three-dimensional assessment for evaluating clinical interventions: Can it Work? Does it work? Is it Worth it? [2, S1]. Table 1 proposes a strategy to answer these questions by description of three outcome dimensions that are assessed under two different conditions from three different perspectives. The strategy requires a different architecture of studies (form and function) and different tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15761/TIM.1000231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/TIM.1000231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

近100年前,阿奇·科克伦和奥斯汀·布拉德福德·希尔提出了一种评估临床干预措施的三维评估方法:它能起作用吗?它有用吗?值得吗?(2, S1)。表1提出了一种策略,通过描述从三个不同角度在两种不同条件下评估的三个结果维度来回答这些问题。该策略需要不同的研究架构(形式和功能)和不同的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Demystification – a solution for assessment of real-world effective-ness?
Nearly 100 years ago Archie Cochrane and Austin Bradford Hill proposed a three-dimensional assessment for evaluating clinical interventions: Can it Work? Does it work? Is it Worth it? [2, S1]. Table 1 proposes a strategy to answer these questions by description of three outcome dimensions that are assessed under two different conditions from three different perspectives. The strategy requires a different architecture of studies (form and function) and different tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信