F. Porzsolt, Christel Weiss, M. Weiss, K. Jauch, R. Kaplan
{"title":"去神秘化——一个评估真实世界有效性的解决方案?","authors":"F. Porzsolt, Christel Weiss, M. Weiss, K. Jauch, R. Kaplan","doi":"10.15761/TIM.1000231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nearly 100 years ago Archie Cochrane and Austin Bradford Hill proposed a three-dimensional assessment for evaluating clinical interventions: Can it Work? Does it work? Is it Worth it? [2, S1]. Table 1 proposes a strategy to answer these questions by description of three outcome dimensions that are assessed under two different conditions from three different perspectives. The strategy requires a different architecture of studies (form and function) and different tools.","PeriodicalId":23337,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demystification – a solution for assessment of real-world effective-ness?\",\"authors\":\"F. Porzsolt, Christel Weiss, M. Weiss, K. Jauch, R. Kaplan\",\"doi\":\"10.15761/TIM.1000231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nearly 100 years ago Archie Cochrane and Austin Bradford Hill proposed a three-dimensional assessment for evaluating clinical interventions: Can it Work? Does it work? Is it Worth it? [2, S1]. Table 1 proposes a strategy to answer these questions by description of three outcome dimensions that are assessed under two different conditions from three different perspectives. The strategy requires a different architecture of studies (form and function) and different tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15761/TIM.1000231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/TIM.1000231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Demystification – a solution for assessment of real-world effective-ness?
Nearly 100 years ago Archie Cochrane and Austin Bradford Hill proposed a three-dimensional assessment for evaluating clinical interventions: Can it Work? Does it work? Is it Worth it? [2, S1]. Table 1 proposes a strategy to answer these questions by description of three outcome dimensions that are assessed under two different conditions from three different perspectives. The strategy requires a different architecture of studies (form and function) and different tools.