影响挪威和丹麦各大医院x射线检查时阴囊护罩使用的主要因素

E. Stranden, D.A. Andersen, E. Bergwitz-Larsen, J.A. Eriksen, J.B. Hydal
{"title":"影响挪威和丹麦各大医院x射线检查时阴囊护罩使用的主要因素","authors":"E. Stranden,&nbsp;D.A. Andersen,&nbsp;E. Bergwitz-Larsen,&nbsp;J.A. Eriksen,&nbsp;J.B. Hydal","doi":"10.1016/j.ejradi.2008.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of the study was to demonstrate the effectiveness of scrotum shields and to find out if scrotum shields are used according to national guidelines. The reasons for not utilizing scrotum shields were also investigated.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A questionnaire was presented to radiographers in order to monitor their actual use of scrotum shield and the main reasons for not using it. Seventy Norwegian and 21 Danish radiographers answered the questions. Images from PACS at the Norwegian hospital were scrutinized. The effectiveness of the shields was studied by phantom measurements using an EDD diode instrument.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For an unshielded dose of 1<!--> <!-->mGy in the primary field, omitted doses of 0.8<!--> <!-->mGy or more could be expected in the primary field and 0.2–0.3<!--> <!-->mGy at a distance of 5<!--> <!-->cm from the edge of the field. PACS information showed that scrotum shield was applied only in 63 out of 359 images. Thirty five percent of the Norwegian and 10% of the Danish radiographers answered that the use of scrotum shields increases the examination time. Twenty five of the 70 Norwegian and none of the Danish radiographers found it embarrassing to ask the patient to use the shields.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Utilization of a scrotum shield is effective even when the scrotum is outside the primary radiation field. Shields are seldom used at three Norwegian hospitals, but are used almost in every case at the Danish hospital. Embarrassment and lack of time are the main reasons for not using the shields.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100505,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiography","volume":"1 1","pages":"Pages 7-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ejradi.2008.12.002","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Main factors influencing the use of scrotum shields during X-ray examinations in major hospitals in Norway and Denmark\",\"authors\":\"E. Stranden,&nbsp;D.A. Andersen,&nbsp;E. Bergwitz-Larsen,&nbsp;J.A. Eriksen,&nbsp;J.B. Hydal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejradi.2008.12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of the study was to demonstrate the effectiveness of scrotum shields and to find out if scrotum shields are used according to national guidelines. The reasons for not utilizing scrotum shields were also investigated.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A questionnaire was presented to radiographers in order to monitor their actual use of scrotum shield and the main reasons for not using it. Seventy Norwegian and 21 Danish radiographers answered the questions. Images from PACS at the Norwegian hospital were scrutinized. The effectiveness of the shields was studied by phantom measurements using an EDD diode instrument.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For an unshielded dose of 1<!--> <!-->mGy in the primary field, omitted doses of 0.8<!--> <!-->mGy or more could be expected in the primary field and 0.2–0.3<!--> <!-->mGy at a distance of 5<!--> <!-->cm from the edge of the field. PACS information showed that scrotum shield was applied only in 63 out of 359 images. Thirty five percent of the Norwegian and 10% of the Danish radiographers answered that the use of scrotum shields increases the examination time. Twenty five of the 70 Norwegian and none of the Danish radiographers found it embarrassing to ask the patient to use the shields.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Utilization of a scrotum shield is effective even when the scrotum is outside the primary radiation field. Shields are seldom used at three Norwegian hospitals, but are used almost in every case at the Danish hospital. Embarrassment and lack of time are the main reasons for not using the shields.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiography\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 7-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ejradi.2008.12.002\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756117508000074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756117508000074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的本研究的目的是证明阴囊护罩的有效性,并了解阴囊护罩的使用是否符合国家指南。对不使用阴囊护罩的原因也进行了探讨。材料与方法对放射技师进行问卷调查,了解他们实际使用阴囊护罩的情况及不使用的主要原因。70名挪威放射技师和21名丹麦放射技师回答了这些问题。来自挪威医院PACS的图像被仔细检查。利用EDD二极管测量仪对屏蔽体的有效性进行了研究。结果原场未屏蔽剂量为1 mGy时,原场可省略0.8 mGy及以上剂量,距场边缘5cm处可省略0.2 ~ 0.3 mGy剂量。PACS信息显示359张图像中只有63张使用了阴囊屏蔽。35%的挪威和10%的丹麦放射技师回答说,使用阴囊保护罩增加了检查时间。70名挪威放射技师中有25人觉得让病人使用防护盾很尴尬,丹麦没有。结论当阴囊处于主辐射场外时,使用阴囊护罩是有效的。3家挪威医院很少使用盾牌,但丹麦医院几乎在所有病例中都使用盾牌。尴尬和没有时间是不使用盾牌的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Main factors influencing the use of scrotum shields during X-ray examinations in major hospitals in Norway and Denmark

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to demonstrate the effectiveness of scrotum shields and to find out if scrotum shields are used according to national guidelines. The reasons for not utilizing scrotum shields were also investigated.

Material and methods

A questionnaire was presented to radiographers in order to monitor their actual use of scrotum shield and the main reasons for not using it. Seventy Norwegian and 21 Danish radiographers answered the questions. Images from PACS at the Norwegian hospital were scrutinized. The effectiveness of the shields was studied by phantom measurements using an EDD diode instrument.

Results

For an unshielded dose of 1 mGy in the primary field, omitted doses of 0.8 mGy or more could be expected in the primary field and 0.2–0.3 mGy at a distance of 5 cm from the edge of the field. PACS information showed that scrotum shield was applied only in 63 out of 359 images. Thirty five percent of the Norwegian and 10% of the Danish radiographers answered that the use of scrotum shields increases the examination time. Twenty five of the 70 Norwegian and none of the Danish radiographers found it embarrassing to ask the patient to use the shields.

Conclusions

Utilization of a scrotum shield is effective even when the scrotum is outside the primary radiation field. Shields are seldom used at three Norwegian hospitals, but are used almost in every case at the Danish hospital. Embarrassment and lack of time are the main reasons for not using the shields.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信