新加坡的汽车保有量和城市交通需求

IF 0.3 4区 工程技术 Q4 ECONOMICS
Michael Z. F. Li, D. C. B. Lau, D. W. M. Seah
{"title":"新加坡的汽车保有量和城市交通需求","authors":"Michael Z. F. Li, D. C. B. Lau, D. W. M. Seah","doi":"10.1400/159664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on a household survey, this study investigates the income effect of car ownership decisions and studies key variables that influence working trip decision in the Singapore context. A binary logit model reveals that the income elasticity for car ownership is 0.5944, meaning that car owners tend to treat cars as necessity for commuting purposes. The low income elasticity implies that the Singapore government can lower the annual vehicle population growth rate from currently 3% to a range of 1 to 2%, which is more sustainable in the long run. A discrete choice model between public transport and private transport indicates that the income elasticity for public transport and private transport is given by -0.257 and 1.385 respectively. The cost elasticity of the private transport and public transport is given by -0.888 and -0.020, respectively, implying that changes in usage costs have big influence on car owners on decision of driving to work and the public transport users remain to be captive users. The cross travel-time elasticity of private transport for public transport is 1.157, which implies that substantial reduction in the travel time by public transport will attract more car users to public transport. To achieve this, the government should expand the bus priority lanes during the peak times and encourage bus operators to offer express services. Finally, the implied value of travel time savings (VTTS) during peak hours for private transport is S$22.76, about 102% of the gross average wage rate of car owners, which is an important parameter for congestion pricing scheme.","PeriodicalId":44910,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transport Economics","volume":"22 1","pages":"1000-1024"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CAR OWNERSHIP AND URBAN TRANSPORT DEMAND IN SINGAPORE\",\"authors\":\"Michael Z. F. Li, D. C. B. Lau, D. W. M. Seah\",\"doi\":\"10.1400/159664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on a household survey, this study investigates the income effect of car ownership decisions and studies key variables that influence working trip decision in the Singapore context. A binary logit model reveals that the income elasticity for car ownership is 0.5944, meaning that car owners tend to treat cars as necessity for commuting purposes. The low income elasticity implies that the Singapore government can lower the annual vehicle population growth rate from currently 3% to a range of 1 to 2%, which is more sustainable in the long run. A discrete choice model between public transport and private transport indicates that the income elasticity for public transport and private transport is given by -0.257 and 1.385 respectively. The cost elasticity of the private transport and public transport is given by -0.888 and -0.020, respectively, implying that changes in usage costs have big influence on car owners on decision of driving to work and the public transport users remain to be captive users. The cross travel-time elasticity of private transport for public transport is 1.157, which implies that substantial reduction in the travel time by public transport will attract more car users to public transport. To achieve this, the government should expand the bus priority lanes during the peak times and encourage bus operators to offer express services. Finally, the implied value of travel time savings (VTTS) during peak hours for private transport is S$22.76, about 102% of the gross average wage rate of car owners, which is an important parameter for congestion pricing scheme.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Transport Economics\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"1000-1024\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Transport Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1400/159664\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transport Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1400/159664","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

本研究以家庭调查为基础,探讨收入对拥有汽车决策的影响,并研究新加坡背景下影响工作出行决策的关键变量。二元logit模型显示,拥有汽车的收入弹性为0.5944,这意味着车主倾向于将汽车作为通勤的必需品。较低的收入弹性意味着新加坡政府可以将每年的车辆人口增长率从目前的3%降低到1 - 2%的范围,这从长远来看更具可持续性。公共交通和私人交通的离散选择模型表明,公共交通和私人交通的收入弹性分别为-0.257和1.385。私人交通和公共交通的成本弹性分别为-0.888和-0.020,这意味着使用成本的变化对车主的驾车上班决策影响较大,公共交通用户仍然是被俘虏的用户。私人交通相对于公共交通的交叉出行时间弹性为1.157,这意味着公共交通出行时间的大幅减少将吸引更多的私家车用户选择公共交通。为了实现这一目标,政府应该在高峰时段扩大公交优先车道,并鼓励公交运营商提供快速服务。最后,私人交通工具在高峰时段的旅行时间节省(VTTS)的隐含价值为22.76新元,约为车主总平均工资率的102%,这是拥堵收费方案的重要参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CAR OWNERSHIP AND URBAN TRANSPORT DEMAND IN SINGAPORE
Based on a household survey, this study investigates the income effect of car ownership decisions and studies key variables that influence working trip decision in the Singapore context. A binary logit model reveals that the income elasticity for car ownership is 0.5944, meaning that car owners tend to treat cars as necessity for commuting purposes. The low income elasticity implies that the Singapore government can lower the annual vehicle population growth rate from currently 3% to a range of 1 to 2%, which is more sustainable in the long run. A discrete choice model between public transport and private transport indicates that the income elasticity for public transport and private transport is given by -0.257 and 1.385 respectively. The cost elasticity of the private transport and public transport is given by -0.888 and -0.020, respectively, implying that changes in usage costs have big influence on car owners on decision of driving to work and the public transport users remain to be captive users. The cross travel-time elasticity of private transport for public transport is 1.157, which implies that substantial reduction in the travel time by public transport will attract more car users to public transport. To achieve this, the government should expand the bus priority lanes during the peak times and encourage bus operators to offer express services. Finally, the implied value of travel time savings (VTTS) during peak hours for private transport is S$22.76, about 102% of the gross average wage rate of car owners, which is an important parameter for congestion pricing scheme.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信