医学生医学伦理学能力评价模型研究

A. Favia, Lily Frank, N. Gligorov, Steven Birnbaum, Paul J. Cummins, Robert Fallar, K. Ferguson, K. Mendis, E. Friedman, R. Rhodes
{"title":"医学生医学伦理学能力评价模型研究","authors":"A. Favia, Lily Frank, N. Gligorov, Steven Birnbaum, Paul J. Cummins, Robert Fallar, K. Ferguson, K. Mendis, E. Friedman, R. Rhodes","doi":"10.1080/21507716.2013.768308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This article focuses on the goals of our medical ethics education program and our formative assessments of students’ competency at various points during this education. Methods: Because of the critical relationship between a program's goals and the design of an assessment strategy, we provide an overview of the theoretical basis of our curriculum, our program's objectives, and teaching methods. In order to verify that our students had achieved minimum competency in the objectives of our ethics curriculum, we developed assessments that evaluated their ability to identify and apply ethical principles to clinical cases and to use moral reasoning to resolve dilemmas. We verified the reliability of these assessment instruments by correlating two different Mount Sinai raters’ scores of the same assessments with each other and the validity of these assessments with external reviewers. Results: For interrater reliability, paired raters scored the same student written exercise within 5 points of each other on 119 of the exercises (87% rater consensus). Therefore, we found our assessment tools to be reliable. Regarding validity, all three expert external reviewers agreed that our instruments were well suited for evaluating medical student competency in medical ethics and that they measured what we intended to measure. Conclusions: Our efforts in medical ethics education and competency assessment have produced an integrated model of goals, methodology, curriculum, and competency assessment. The entire model is directed at providing students with the ethical knowledge, skills, and attitudes required of an exemplary physician. We have developed reliable and valid assessment tools that allow us to evaluate the competency of students in medical ethics and to identify students who require remediation, and that are useful for other ethics programs.","PeriodicalId":89316,"journal":{"name":"AJOB primary research","volume":"7 1","pages":"68 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Model for the Assessment of Medical Students’ Competency in Medical Ethics\",\"authors\":\"A. Favia, Lily Frank, N. Gligorov, Steven Birnbaum, Paul J. Cummins, Robert Fallar, K. Ferguson, K. Mendis, E. Friedman, R. Rhodes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21507716.2013.768308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: This article focuses on the goals of our medical ethics education program and our formative assessments of students’ competency at various points during this education. Methods: Because of the critical relationship between a program's goals and the design of an assessment strategy, we provide an overview of the theoretical basis of our curriculum, our program's objectives, and teaching methods. In order to verify that our students had achieved minimum competency in the objectives of our ethics curriculum, we developed assessments that evaluated their ability to identify and apply ethical principles to clinical cases and to use moral reasoning to resolve dilemmas. We verified the reliability of these assessment instruments by correlating two different Mount Sinai raters’ scores of the same assessments with each other and the validity of these assessments with external reviewers. Results: For interrater reliability, paired raters scored the same student written exercise within 5 points of each other on 119 of the exercises (87% rater consensus). Therefore, we found our assessment tools to be reliable. Regarding validity, all three expert external reviewers agreed that our instruments were well suited for evaluating medical student competency in medical ethics and that they measured what we intended to measure. Conclusions: Our efforts in medical ethics education and competency assessment have produced an integrated model of goals, methodology, curriculum, and competency assessment. The entire model is directed at providing students with the ethical knowledge, skills, and attitudes required of an exemplary physician. We have developed reliable and valid assessment tools that allow us to evaluate the competency of students in medical ethics and to identify students who require remediation, and that are useful for other ethics programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJOB primary research\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"68 - 83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJOB primary research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507716.2013.768308\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB primary research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507716.2013.768308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

背景:本文主要介绍我校医学伦理教育的目标,以及我校在医学伦理教育的各个阶段对学生能力的形成性评价。方法:由于项目目标和评估策略设计之间的关键关系,我们概述了课程的理论基础、项目目标和教学方法。为了验证我们的学生已经达到了道德课程目标的最低能力,我们制定了评估,评估他们识别和应用道德原则到临床病例的能力,以及使用道德推理来解决困境的能力。我们通过将两个不同的西奈山评分者对相同评估的评分相互关联以及这些评估与外部评论者的有效性来验证这些评估工具的可靠性。结果:对于评分者的信度,配对评分者在119个练习中对同一学生的书面练习的评分在5分以内(87%的评分者一致)。因此,我们发现我们的评估工具是可靠的。关于效度,所有三位外部评审专家一致认为,我们的工具非常适合评估医学生在医学伦理学方面的能力,而且它们测量的是我们打算测量的东西。结论:我们在医学伦理教育和能力评估方面的努力已经形成了一个目标、方法、课程和能力评估的综合模型。整个模式的目的是为学生提供道德知识,技能和态度要求一个模范医生。我们开发了可靠有效的评估工具,使我们能够评估学生在医学伦理学方面的能力,并确定需要补习的学生,这对其他伦理学课程很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Model for the Assessment of Medical Students’ Competency in Medical Ethics
Background: This article focuses on the goals of our medical ethics education program and our formative assessments of students’ competency at various points during this education. Methods: Because of the critical relationship between a program's goals and the design of an assessment strategy, we provide an overview of the theoretical basis of our curriculum, our program's objectives, and teaching methods. In order to verify that our students had achieved minimum competency in the objectives of our ethics curriculum, we developed assessments that evaluated their ability to identify and apply ethical principles to clinical cases and to use moral reasoning to resolve dilemmas. We verified the reliability of these assessment instruments by correlating two different Mount Sinai raters’ scores of the same assessments with each other and the validity of these assessments with external reviewers. Results: For interrater reliability, paired raters scored the same student written exercise within 5 points of each other on 119 of the exercises (87% rater consensus). Therefore, we found our assessment tools to be reliable. Regarding validity, all three expert external reviewers agreed that our instruments were well suited for evaluating medical student competency in medical ethics and that they measured what we intended to measure. Conclusions: Our efforts in medical ethics education and competency assessment have produced an integrated model of goals, methodology, curriculum, and competency assessment. The entire model is directed at providing students with the ethical knowledge, skills, and attitudes required of an exemplary physician. We have developed reliable and valid assessment tools that allow us to evaluate the competency of students in medical ethics and to identify students who require remediation, and that are useful for other ethics programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信