多参与者环境下的众包和基于共识的决策协作平台

Cristian Ciurea, F. Filip
{"title":"多参与者环境下的众包和基于共识的决策协作平台","authors":"Cristian Ciurea, F. Filip","doi":"10.12948/issn14531305/23.2.2019.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents a new approach related to crowdsourcing and consensus in the multiparticipant decision-making process. Multi-participant decision-making techniques, based on consensus building models frequently assume there are not really many decision makers in the group (appropriate operations can be done by complete enumeration). The consensus building and the crowdsourcing approach in the decision-making process are described. The most wellknown top ten crowdsourcing platforms are analyzed and a comparison between them is made, in order to show existing and partially supported features.","PeriodicalId":53248,"journal":{"name":"Informatica economica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collaborative Platforms for Crowdsourcing and Consensus-based Decisions in Multi-Participant Environments\",\"authors\":\"Cristian Ciurea, F. Filip\",\"doi\":\"10.12948/issn14531305/23.2.2019.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper presents a new approach related to crowdsourcing and consensus in the multiparticipant decision-making process. Multi-participant decision-making techniques, based on consensus building models frequently assume there are not really many decision makers in the group (appropriate operations can be done by complete enumeration). The consensus building and the crowdsourcing approach in the decision-making process are described. The most wellknown top ten crowdsourcing platforms are analyzed and a comparison between them is made, in order to show existing and partially supported features.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Informatica economica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Informatica economica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12948/issn14531305/23.2.2019.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatica economica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12948/issn14531305/23.2.2019.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文提出了一种与多参与者决策过程中的众包和共识相关的新方法。基于共识构建模型的多参与者决策技术经常假设组中没有真正的许多决策者(适当的操作可以通过完全枚举来完成)。描述了决策过程中的共识建立和众包方法。分析了最知名的十大众包平台,并对其进行了比较,以展示现有的和部分支持的功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Collaborative Platforms for Crowdsourcing and Consensus-based Decisions in Multi-Participant Environments
The paper presents a new approach related to crowdsourcing and consensus in the multiparticipant decision-making process. Multi-participant decision-making techniques, based on consensus building models frequently assume there are not really many decision makers in the group (appropriate operations can be done by complete enumeration). The consensus building and the crowdsourcing approach in the decision-making process are described. The most wellknown top ten crowdsourcing platforms are analyzed and a comparison between them is made, in order to show existing and partially supported features.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信