校长的看法:正规与非正规教育系统学士毕业生的教学成效

June 1 Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.51380/gujr-39-02-06
Parveen Saif, Amjad Reba, Tanzila Akbar
{"title":"校长的看法:正规与非正规教育系统学士毕业生的教学成效","authors":"Parveen Saif, Amjad Reba, Tanzila Akbar","doi":"10.51380/gujr-39-02-06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are two recognized systems of the education. One is called formal system where face to face teaching- learning process is arranged in the classroom under prescribed scheme of studies for prescribed time. Other is known as non-formal system, which is delivered outside the framework of formal educational institutions. Both systems provide not only academic but professional programmes also, such as PTC, CT, B.Ed and M.Ed etc. This study is designed to compare the pedagogical expertise of graduates who have received B.Ed degree from these two systems. Further, results of this study may motivate heads of schools to arrange teacher training workshops for those teachers who have less command on teaching competencies. This study used Survey Research Methodology. Sample of study included 20 schools purposively selected. Data for the study were collected through questionnaire that consisted of 12 questions for heads of the schools. After analysis, the data revealed that B.Ed graduates of conventional system of teacher education were pedagogically more capable in comparison with B.Ed graduates of non-formal system of teacher education. However, B.Ed graduates of both systems were equally fair and impartial in giving rewards to their students.","PeriodicalId":17736,"journal":{"name":"June 1","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PRINCIPALS' PERCEPTIONS: TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS OF B.ED GRADUATES OF FORMAL AND NON-FORMAL SYSTEMS\",\"authors\":\"Parveen Saif, Amjad Reba, Tanzila Akbar\",\"doi\":\"10.51380/gujr-39-02-06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are two recognized systems of the education. One is called formal system where face to face teaching- learning process is arranged in the classroom under prescribed scheme of studies for prescribed time. Other is known as non-formal system, which is delivered outside the framework of formal educational institutions. Both systems provide not only academic but professional programmes also, such as PTC, CT, B.Ed and M.Ed etc. This study is designed to compare the pedagogical expertise of graduates who have received B.Ed degree from these two systems. Further, results of this study may motivate heads of schools to arrange teacher training workshops for those teachers who have less command on teaching competencies. This study used Survey Research Methodology. Sample of study included 20 schools purposively selected. Data for the study were collected through questionnaire that consisted of 12 questions for heads of the schools. After analysis, the data revealed that B.Ed graduates of conventional system of teacher education were pedagogically more capable in comparison with B.Ed graduates of non-formal system of teacher education. However, B.Ed graduates of both systems were equally fair and impartial in giving rewards to their students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"June 1\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"June 1\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51380/gujr-39-02-06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"June 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51380/gujr-39-02-06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有两种公认的教育体系。一种是所谓的正式系统,在规定的学习计划下,面对面的教学过程在规定的时间内安排在教室里。另一种被称为非正规系统,它是在正规教育机构的框架之外提供的。这两个系统不仅提供学术课程,还提供专业课程,如PTC、CT、B.Ed和M.Ed等。本研究旨在比较这两个系统的学士学位毕业生的教学专业知识。此外,本研究的结果可能会激励学校校长为教学能力较差的教师安排教师培训工作坊。本研究采用调查研究方法。研究样本包括有意选择的20所学校。该研究的数据是通过调查问卷收集的,调查问卷由12个问题组成。经过分析,数据显示传统教师教育体制的学士学位毕业生比非正规教师教育体制的学士学位毕业生在教学能力上更强。然而,两种教育体系的学士学位毕业生在奖励学生方面同样公平公正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PRINCIPALS' PERCEPTIONS: TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS OF B.ED GRADUATES OF FORMAL AND NON-FORMAL SYSTEMS
There are two recognized systems of the education. One is called formal system where face to face teaching- learning process is arranged in the classroom under prescribed scheme of studies for prescribed time. Other is known as non-formal system, which is delivered outside the framework of formal educational institutions. Both systems provide not only academic but professional programmes also, such as PTC, CT, B.Ed and M.Ed etc. This study is designed to compare the pedagogical expertise of graduates who have received B.Ed degree from these two systems. Further, results of this study may motivate heads of schools to arrange teacher training workshops for those teachers who have less command on teaching competencies. This study used Survey Research Methodology. Sample of study included 20 schools purposively selected. Data for the study were collected through questionnaire that consisted of 12 questions for heads of the schools. After analysis, the data revealed that B.Ed graduates of conventional system of teacher education were pedagogically more capable in comparison with B.Ed graduates of non-formal system of teacher education. However, B.Ed graduates of both systems were equally fair and impartial in giving rewards to their students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信