主动脉瓣置换术后心肌梗死的危险因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析

W. Hsieh, Po-Lin Chen, L. Goláň, Br, on Michael Henry, C. Kan, M. Omara, J. Lindner
{"title":"主动脉瓣置换术后心肌梗死的危险因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"W. Hsieh, Po-Lin Chen, L. Goláň, Br, on Michael Henry, C. Kan, M. Omara, J. Lindner","doi":"10.4172/2329-6925.1000372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Myocardial infarction (MI) is a frequent perioperative complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) associated with significant morbidity and mortality in comparison to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Objectives: This meta-analysis aims to assess the periprocedural incidence of MI, along with its risk factors in adult patients undergoing TAVR and SAVR due to severe aortic stenosis. Methods: A systematic literature review of the major electronic databases was performed to identify relevant articles published from January 2007 to September 2017. A meta-analysis was performed to quantify the incidence and prognostic factors for periprocedural MI following TAVR via “Review Manager (REVMAN) 5.3 Copenhagen”. Results: A total of 32 studies with a combined cohort of 15961 patients undergoing TAVR were included in this meta-analysis. Using a fixed-effects model, it was found that the TAVR procedure may lead to significantly low risk of myocardial infarction as compared to the SAVR (0.5% vs. 1.1%; RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.25-0.75; P=0.003; I2 =0%) The incidence and extent of periprocedural MI further to TAVR have been found associated with both short- and long-term mortality (p=0.002 and p=0.003, respectively). Conclusions: Incidence of MI was associated with lower risk of TAVR compared to SAVR. However, further studies are warranted to assess the role of CK-MB and troponin, as a prognostic factor to predict the clinical outcome. This study provides an evidence-based analysis on risk factors that could help predict the incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR in comparison with SAVR.","PeriodicalId":17397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Medicine & Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Risk Factors of Myocardial Infraction after Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"W. Hsieh, Po-Lin Chen, L. Goláň, Br, on Michael Henry, C. Kan, M. Omara, J. Lindner\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2329-6925.1000372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Myocardial infarction (MI) is a frequent perioperative complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) associated with significant morbidity and mortality in comparison to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Objectives: This meta-analysis aims to assess the periprocedural incidence of MI, along with its risk factors in adult patients undergoing TAVR and SAVR due to severe aortic stenosis. Methods: A systematic literature review of the major electronic databases was performed to identify relevant articles published from January 2007 to September 2017. A meta-analysis was performed to quantify the incidence and prognostic factors for periprocedural MI following TAVR via “Review Manager (REVMAN) 5.3 Copenhagen”. Results: A total of 32 studies with a combined cohort of 15961 patients undergoing TAVR were included in this meta-analysis. Using a fixed-effects model, it was found that the TAVR procedure may lead to significantly low risk of myocardial infarction as compared to the SAVR (0.5% vs. 1.1%; RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.25-0.75; P=0.003; I2 =0%) The incidence and extent of periprocedural MI further to TAVR have been found associated with both short- and long-term mortality (p=0.002 and p=0.003, respectively). Conclusions: Incidence of MI was associated with lower risk of TAVR compared to SAVR. However, further studies are warranted to assess the role of CK-MB and troponin, as a prognostic factor to predict the clinical outcome. This study provides an evidence-based analysis on risk factors that could help predict the incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR in comparison with SAVR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Medicine & Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Medicine & Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6925.1000372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Medicine & Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6925.1000372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心肌梗死(MI)是经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的常见围手术期并发症,与外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)相比,其发病率和死亡率显著增高。目的:本荟萃分析旨在评估因严重主动脉狭窄而行TAVR和SAVR的成年患者的围手术期心肌梗死发生率及其危险因素。方法:对2007年1月至2017年9月发表的相关文献进行系统检索。通过“Review Manager (REVMAN) 5.3 Copenhagen”进行荟萃分析,量化TAVR术后围手术期心肌梗死的发生率和预后因素。结果:本荟萃分析共纳入32项研究,15961例接受TAVR的患者。使用固定效应模型,发现与SAVR相比,TAVR手术可能导致心肌梗死的风险显著降低(0.5% vs. 1.1%;RR 0.44;95% ci, 0.25-0.75;P = 0.003;术中心肌梗死的发生率和程度与TAVR的短期和长期死亡率相关(p=0.002和p=0.003)。结论:与SAVR相比,心肌梗死的发生率与TAVR的低风险相关。然而,需要进一步的研究来评估CK-MB和肌钙蛋白作为预测临床结果的预后因素的作用。本研究对严重主动脉狭窄患者行TAVR与SAVR的危险因素进行循证分析,有助于预测围手术期心肌梗死的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Risk Factors of Myocardial Infraction after Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Myocardial infarction (MI) is a frequent perioperative complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) associated with significant morbidity and mortality in comparison to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Objectives: This meta-analysis aims to assess the periprocedural incidence of MI, along with its risk factors in adult patients undergoing TAVR and SAVR due to severe aortic stenosis. Methods: A systematic literature review of the major electronic databases was performed to identify relevant articles published from January 2007 to September 2017. A meta-analysis was performed to quantify the incidence and prognostic factors for periprocedural MI following TAVR via “Review Manager (REVMAN) 5.3 Copenhagen”. Results: A total of 32 studies with a combined cohort of 15961 patients undergoing TAVR were included in this meta-analysis. Using a fixed-effects model, it was found that the TAVR procedure may lead to significantly low risk of myocardial infarction as compared to the SAVR (0.5% vs. 1.1%; RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.25-0.75; P=0.003; I2 =0%) The incidence and extent of periprocedural MI further to TAVR have been found associated with both short- and long-term mortality (p=0.002 and p=0.003, respectively). Conclusions: Incidence of MI was associated with lower risk of TAVR compared to SAVR. However, further studies are warranted to assess the role of CK-MB and troponin, as a prognostic factor to predict the clinical outcome. This study provides an evidence-based analysis on risk factors that could help predict the incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR in comparison with SAVR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信