保险状况是否会影响阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的上呼吸道刺激治疗?

Jena Patel, Michael C. Topf, C. Huntley, M. Boon
{"title":"保险状况是否会影响阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的上呼吸道刺激治疗?","authors":"Jena Patel, Michael C. Topf, C. Huntley, M. Boon","doi":"10.1177/0003489419878454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To understand differences in patient demographics, insurance-related treatment delays, and average waiting times for Medicare and private insurance patients undergoing upper airway stimulation (UAS) for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods: Retrospective chart review of all Medicare and private insurance patients undergoing upper airway stimulation (UAS) from 2015 to 2018 at a single academic center. Primary outcomes were insurance-related procedure cancellation rate and time from drug induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) and UAS treatment recommendation to UAS surgery in Medicare versus private insurance patients. Results: In our cohort 207 underwent DISE and were recommended treatment with UAS. Forty-four patients with Medicare and 30 patients with private insurance underwent UAS procedure. Patients with Medicare undergoing UAS were older (67.4 ± 11.1 years) than patients with private insurance (54.9 ± 8.1 years). Medicare patients had a shorter mean wait time of 121.9 ± 75.8 days (range, 15-331 days) from the time of UAS treatment recommendation to UAS surgery when compared to patients with private insurance (201.3 ± 102.2 days; range, 33-477 days). Three patients with Medicare (6.4%) and 8 patients with private insurance (21.1%) were ultimately denied UAS. Conclusion: Medicare patients undergoing UAS have shorter waiting periods, fewer insurance-related treatment delays and may experience fewer procedure cancellations when compared to patients with private insurance. The investigational status of UAS by private insurance companies delays care for patients with OSA. Level of Evidence: 4","PeriodicalId":8361,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology","volume":"27 1","pages":"128 - 134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Insurance Status Impact Delivery of Care with Upper Airway Stimulation for OSA?\",\"authors\":\"Jena Patel, Michael C. Topf, C. Huntley, M. Boon\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0003489419878454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To understand differences in patient demographics, insurance-related treatment delays, and average waiting times for Medicare and private insurance patients undergoing upper airway stimulation (UAS) for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods: Retrospective chart review of all Medicare and private insurance patients undergoing upper airway stimulation (UAS) from 2015 to 2018 at a single academic center. Primary outcomes were insurance-related procedure cancellation rate and time from drug induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) and UAS treatment recommendation to UAS surgery in Medicare versus private insurance patients. Results: In our cohort 207 underwent DISE and were recommended treatment with UAS. Forty-four patients with Medicare and 30 patients with private insurance underwent UAS procedure. Patients with Medicare undergoing UAS were older (67.4 ± 11.1 years) than patients with private insurance (54.9 ± 8.1 years). Medicare patients had a shorter mean wait time of 121.9 ± 75.8 days (range, 15-331 days) from the time of UAS treatment recommendation to UAS surgery when compared to patients with private insurance (201.3 ± 102.2 days; range, 33-477 days). Three patients with Medicare (6.4%) and 8 patients with private insurance (21.1%) were ultimately denied UAS. Conclusion: Medicare patients undergoing UAS have shorter waiting periods, fewer insurance-related treatment delays and may experience fewer procedure cancellations when compared to patients with private insurance. The investigational status of UAS by private insurance companies delays care for patients with OSA. Level of Evidence: 4\",\"PeriodicalId\":8361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"128 - 134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489419878454\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489419878454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:了解医疗保险和私人保险患者接受上呼吸道刺激(UAS)治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的患者人口统计学、保险相关治疗延迟和平均等待时间的差异。方法:回顾性分析2015年至2018年在同一学术中心接受上呼吸道刺激(UAS)治疗的所有医疗保险和私人保险患者。主要结局是与保险相关的手术取消率和药物诱导睡眠内窥镜(dis)的时间,以及医疗保险患者与私人保险患者的UAS治疗推荐到UAS手术。结果:在我们的队列中,207例患者接受了DISE,并推荐使用UAS治疗。44名医疗保险患者和30名私人保险患者接受了UAS手术。医疗保险患者接受UAS的年龄(67.4±11.1岁)大于私人保险患者(54.9±8.1岁)。医疗保险患者从推荐UAS治疗到UAS手术的平均等待时间为121.9±75.8天(范围15-331天),比私人保险患者(201.3±102.2天;范围:33-477天)。3名医疗保险患者(6.4%)和8名私人保险患者(21.1%)最终被拒绝UAS。结论:与私人保险患者相比,接受UAS的医疗保险患者等待时间更短,与保险相关的治疗延误更少,并且可能经历更少的手术取消。私人保险公司对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的调查状况延误了对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的护理。证据等级:4
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Insurance Status Impact Delivery of Care with Upper Airway Stimulation for OSA?
Objective: To understand differences in patient demographics, insurance-related treatment delays, and average waiting times for Medicare and private insurance patients undergoing upper airway stimulation (UAS) for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods: Retrospective chart review of all Medicare and private insurance patients undergoing upper airway stimulation (UAS) from 2015 to 2018 at a single academic center. Primary outcomes were insurance-related procedure cancellation rate and time from drug induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) and UAS treatment recommendation to UAS surgery in Medicare versus private insurance patients. Results: In our cohort 207 underwent DISE and were recommended treatment with UAS. Forty-four patients with Medicare and 30 patients with private insurance underwent UAS procedure. Patients with Medicare undergoing UAS were older (67.4 ± 11.1 years) than patients with private insurance (54.9 ± 8.1 years). Medicare patients had a shorter mean wait time of 121.9 ± 75.8 days (range, 15-331 days) from the time of UAS treatment recommendation to UAS surgery when compared to patients with private insurance (201.3 ± 102.2 days; range, 33-477 days). Three patients with Medicare (6.4%) and 8 patients with private insurance (21.1%) were ultimately denied UAS. Conclusion: Medicare patients undergoing UAS have shorter waiting periods, fewer insurance-related treatment delays and may experience fewer procedure cancellations when compared to patients with private insurance. The investigational status of UAS by private insurance companies delays care for patients with OSA. Level of Evidence: 4
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信