出了煎锅,又进了火:可调利率抵押贷款为贫困家庭提供资金的案例

Muhammad Arsalan Aqeeq
{"title":"出了煎锅,又进了火:可调利率抵押贷款为贫困家庭提供资金的案例","authors":"Muhammad Arsalan Aqeeq","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2676172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The topic of Adjustable Rate Mortgage (ARM) in its first glimpse, takes us to the reader of terms like Global Financial Crisis, Meltdown, Subprime crisis and its horrors. Global Financial Crisis (GFC) – The greatest of all financial crisis after the great depression of 1930, emancipated from a complicated interplay of policy to improve home ownership, by greater credit supply, laxed terms, overoptimistic assumption of real estate growth, predatory lending stunts instincts, and option to offload the balance sheet by securitization, poor remuneration to promote short term gain versus long-term value and last but not the least and macro-prudential governance shortfalls. The reason we discuss GFC here is that ARM were employed by Financial Institutions to finance the subprime i.e. the under-privileged. So did it work? No, it actually coasted them a USD 4.1 Trillion losses, 9 Million families displaced and thousands unemployed. Notwithstanding the fact that, a lot many other factors such as weak underwriting, monetary tightening, moral hazard across the value chain, unrealistic assumption on real estate valuation contributed to the GFC. Farhi, E., & Tirole, J. (2009) termed the GFC as Collective Moral Hazard while reviewing the role of macro prudential regulation, Interest rates, Lender and Investment Banks. This article would assess the structural dynamics of ARMs and subsequently rationalize its inability to alleviate or address the financing needs of the underprivileged.","PeriodicalId":12014,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Microeconometric Studies of Housing Markets (Topic)","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Out of the Frying Pan – in to the Fire: The Case of Adjustable Rate Mortgage for Funding of Homes of the Underprivileged\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Arsalan Aqeeq\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2676172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The topic of Adjustable Rate Mortgage (ARM) in its first glimpse, takes us to the reader of terms like Global Financial Crisis, Meltdown, Subprime crisis and its horrors. Global Financial Crisis (GFC) – The greatest of all financial crisis after the great depression of 1930, emancipated from a complicated interplay of policy to improve home ownership, by greater credit supply, laxed terms, overoptimistic assumption of real estate growth, predatory lending stunts instincts, and option to offload the balance sheet by securitization, poor remuneration to promote short term gain versus long-term value and last but not the least and macro-prudential governance shortfalls. The reason we discuss GFC here is that ARM were employed by Financial Institutions to finance the subprime i.e. the under-privileged. So did it work? No, it actually coasted them a USD 4.1 Trillion losses, 9 Million families displaced and thousands unemployed. Notwithstanding the fact that, a lot many other factors such as weak underwriting, monetary tightening, moral hazard across the value chain, unrealistic assumption on real estate valuation contributed to the GFC. Farhi, E., & Tirole, J. (2009) termed the GFC as Collective Moral Hazard while reviewing the role of macro prudential regulation, Interest rates, Lender and Investment Banks. This article would assess the structural dynamics of ARMs and subsequently rationalize its inability to alleviate or address the financing needs of the underprivileged.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Microeconometric Studies of Housing Markets (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Microeconometric Studies of Housing Markets (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2676172\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Microeconometric Studies of Housing Markets (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2676172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可调利率抵押贷款(ARM)这一主题的第一眼,就把我们带到了像全球金融危机、崩溃、次贷危机及其恐怖等术语的读者面前。全球金融危机(GFC)——1930年大萧条之后最严重的金融危机,通过更多的信贷供应、宽松的条款、对房地产增长的过于乐观的假设、掠夺性贷款的本能以及通过证券化减轻资产负债表负担的选择,从改善住房所有权的复杂政策相互作用中解放出来。为了促进短期收益而非长期价值而提供的低薪酬,以及最后但并非最不重要的一点,以及宏观审慎治理的不足。我们在这里讨论全球金融危机的原因是,ARM被金融机构雇用,为次级贷款(即弱势群体)提供融资。那么,它起作用了吗?不,它实际上给他们造成了4.1万亿美元的损失,900万个家庭流离失所,数千人失业。尽管事实是,许多其他因素,如承销不力、货币紧缩、整个价值链的道德风险、对房地产估值的不切实际假设,都促成了全球金融危机。Farhi, E., & Tirole, J.(2009)在回顾宏观审慎监管、利率、贷方和投资银行的作用时,将全球金融危机称为集体道德风险。本文将评估ARMs的结构动态,并随后合理化其无法减轻或解决弱势群体的融资需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Out of the Frying Pan – in to the Fire: The Case of Adjustable Rate Mortgage for Funding of Homes of the Underprivileged
The topic of Adjustable Rate Mortgage (ARM) in its first glimpse, takes us to the reader of terms like Global Financial Crisis, Meltdown, Subprime crisis and its horrors. Global Financial Crisis (GFC) – The greatest of all financial crisis after the great depression of 1930, emancipated from a complicated interplay of policy to improve home ownership, by greater credit supply, laxed terms, overoptimistic assumption of real estate growth, predatory lending stunts instincts, and option to offload the balance sheet by securitization, poor remuneration to promote short term gain versus long-term value and last but not the least and macro-prudential governance shortfalls. The reason we discuss GFC here is that ARM were employed by Financial Institutions to finance the subprime i.e. the under-privileged. So did it work? No, it actually coasted them a USD 4.1 Trillion losses, 9 Million families displaced and thousands unemployed. Notwithstanding the fact that, a lot many other factors such as weak underwriting, monetary tightening, moral hazard across the value chain, unrealistic assumption on real estate valuation contributed to the GFC. Farhi, E., & Tirole, J. (2009) termed the GFC as Collective Moral Hazard while reviewing the role of macro prudential regulation, Interest rates, Lender and Investment Banks. This article would assess the structural dynamics of ARMs and subsequently rationalize its inability to alleviate or address the financing needs of the underprivileged.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信