西澳大利亚地区航空重力测量:对最终用户的考虑

M. Bates, S. Elieff, K. Kaski, David Howard, J. Brett, R. Lane
{"title":"西澳大利亚地区航空重力测量:对最终用户的考虑","authors":"M. Bates, S. Elieff, K. Kaski, David Howard, J. Brett, R. Lane","doi":"10.1080/22020586.2019.12072976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Regional airborne gravity surveys are being acquired over much of the State of Western Australia by the Geological Survey of Western Australia (GSWA) and Geoscience Australia (GA) to provide coverage where existing ground gravity coverage is sparse. The acquisition and processing of these surveys poses several challenges. The data acquired by Sander Geophysics (SGL) using the AIRGrav system in Western Australia during 2018 was done so without control lines for reasons of cost efficiency, relying on the ground gravity to provide the necessary levelling corrections. Methodologies have been developed to achieve effective levelling under these circumstances, although the final result varies depending on the methodology used. Data acquired on earlier surveys with control lines are being used to compare and contrast to data acquired without them. Ongoing power spectrum analysis suggests a way in which the different methods may be judged objectively. Horizontal components of gravity are also acquired by AIRGrav. Levelling these components is a challenge under all circumstances. The relationships between the components expressed in potential field theory allow the different components data to be compared and checked for consistency. Digital elevation model (DEM) data acquired during the surveys provide a means for checking other sources of DEM typically employed for applying terrain corrections. The impact of inaccurate DEM data on the corrected gravity data overall is small but can be locally significant. Data quality of the regional surveys is high, but the end user should be aware of the limitations posed by the choices made in data acquisition and processing.","PeriodicalId":8502,"journal":{"name":"ASEG Extended Abstracts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional airborne gravity surveys in Western Australia: Considerations for the end user\",\"authors\":\"M. Bates, S. Elieff, K. Kaski, David Howard, J. Brett, R. Lane\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/22020586.2019.12072976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary Regional airborne gravity surveys are being acquired over much of the State of Western Australia by the Geological Survey of Western Australia (GSWA) and Geoscience Australia (GA) to provide coverage where existing ground gravity coverage is sparse. The acquisition and processing of these surveys poses several challenges. The data acquired by Sander Geophysics (SGL) using the AIRGrav system in Western Australia during 2018 was done so without control lines for reasons of cost efficiency, relying on the ground gravity to provide the necessary levelling corrections. Methodologies have been developed to achieve effective levelling under these circumstances, although the final result varies depending on the methodology used. Data acquired on earlier surveys with control lines are being used to compare and contrast to data acquired without them. Ongoing power spectrum analysis suggests a way in which the different methods may be judged objectively. Horizontal components of gravity are also acquired by AIRGrav. Levelling these components is a challenge under all circumstances. The relationships between the components expressed in potential field theory allow the different components data to be compared and checked for consistency. Digital elevation model (DEM) data acquired during the surveys provide a means for checking other sources of DEM typically employed for applying terrain corrections. The impact of inaccurate DEM data on the corrected gravity data overall is small but can be locally significant. Data quality of the regional surveys is high, but the end user should be aware of the limitations posed by the choices made in data acquisition and processing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASEG Extended Abstracts\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASEG Extended Abstracts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/22020586.2019.12072976\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASEG Extended Abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/22020586.2019.12072976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

西澳大利亚地质调查局(GSWA)和澳大利亚地球科学(GA)正在西澳大利亚州的大部分地区进行区域航空重力测量,以覆盖现有地面重力覆盖较少的地区。这些测量的获取和处理带来了一些挑战。Sander地球物理公司(SGL)于2018年在西澳大利亚州使用airgravity系统获取的数据,出于成本效益的考虑,没有使用控制线,而是依靠地面重力提供必要的调平校正。为了在这种情况下实现有效的调平,已经开发了各种方法,尽管最终结果因所使用的方法而异。在早期调查中使用控制线获得的数据被用来与没有控制线获得的数据进行比较和对比。正在进行的功率谱分析提出了一种客观判断不同方法的方法。AIRGrav还可以获取重力的水平分量。在任何情况下,平衡这些组件都是一个挑战。势场理论中所表达的分量之间的关系允许对不同分量的数据进行比较和一致性检查。在调查期间获得的数字高程模型(DEM)数据为检查通常用于应用地形校正的DEM的其他来源提供了一种手段。总体而言,不准确的DEM数据对校正后的重力数据的影响很小,但局部影响可能很大。区域调查的数据质量很高,但最终用户应该意识到在数据获取和处理方面所作的选择所造成的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regional airborne gravity surveys in Western Australia: Considerations for the end user
Summary Regional airborne gravity surveys are being acquired over much of the State of Western Australia by the Geological Survey of Western Australia (GSWA) and Geoscience Australia (GA) to provide coverage where existing ground gravity coverage is sparse. The acquisition and processing of these surveys poses several challenges. The data acquired by Sander Geophysics (SGL) using the AIRGrav system in Western Australia during 2018 was done so without control lines for reasons of cost efficiency, relying on the ground gravity to provide the necessary levelling corrections. Methodologies have been developed to achieve effective levelling under these circumstances, although the final result varies depending on the methodology used. Data acquired on earlier surveys with control lines are being used to compare and contrast to data acquired without them. Ongoing power spectrum analysis suggests a way in which the different methods may be judged objectively. Horizontal components of gravity are also acquired by AIRGrav. Levelling these components is a challenge under all circumstances. The relationships between the components expressed in potential field theory allow the different components data to be compared and checked for consistency. Digital elevation model (DEM) data acquired during the surveys provide a means for checking other sources of DEM typically employed for applying terrain corrections. The impact of inaccurate DEM data on the corrected gravity data overall is small but can be locally significant. Data quality of the regional surveys is high, but the end user should be aware of the limitations posed by the choices made in data acquisition and processing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信