北美老式氢气管道的安全再利用

Daniel Sandana, N. Gallon, Ollie Burkinshaw, A. Bhatia
{"title":"北美老式氢气管道的安全再利用","authors":"Daniel Sandana, N. Gallon, Ollie Burkinshaw, A. Bhatia","doi":"10.1115/ipc2022-87088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Hydrogen has been championed as a vital player in the future energy mix needed to achieve net-zero carbon emissions. The deployment of hydrogen at an industrial scale will require pipelines for transportation, and given the many obstacles to new pipeline construction, it appears inevitable that a large proportion of the future hydrogen pipeline network will consist of repurposed existing infrastructure.\n Conversion strategies require that retrofit pipelines remain operationally safe under the new mode of transportation. From an integrity perspective, the conversion exercise will require understanding the line pipe material’s “DNA” (e.g. grades, hard spots) and assessing the impact of hydrogen on key pipeline mechanical properties (e.g. fracture toughness) and on the tolerance of integrity threats. These threats include those that may already exist from previous hydrocarbon service (e.g. stress-corrosion cracking), those that are directly related to the conversion to hydrogen (e.g. fatigue) and those that are an integral part of a pipeline life cycle (e.g. third-party damages, geohazards). There is currently a lack of clarity within the industry about how to quantify and manage these threats to hydrogen pipelines. How, if at all, should an integrity management strategy for a hydrogen pipeline differ from that of a natural gas pipeline?\n In order to define the boundaries of the existing North American pipeline network and the starting point for conversion, this paper will conduct an Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) of (i) the pipeline network’s “DNA” (e.g. diameters, thicknesses, grades, fracture toughness, hard spots, age), and (ii) the pipeline threat and condition attributes (e.g. pre-existing crack threats, crack distribution). This paper will take advantage of the knowledge derived from the ROSEN Integrity Data Warehouse (IDW), a global repository of ILI results and Integrity Management, in order to quantify the characteristics specific to North America.\n A pragmatic approach to safely repurposing existing pipelines to hydrogen service will be then presented in recognition of the identified regional ‘DNA’ and integrity peculiarities, and in respect to applicable local codes and regulations.","PeriodicalId":21327,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safe Repurposing of Vintage Pipelines for Hydrogen in North America\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Sandana, N. Gallon, Ollie Burkinshaw, A. Bhatia\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/ipc2022-87088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Hydrogen has been championed as a vital player in the future energy mix needed to achieve net-zero carbon emissions. The deployment of hydrogen at an industrial scale will require pipelines for transportation, and given the many obstacles to new pipeline construction, it appears inevitable that a large proportion of the future hydrogen pipeline network will consist of repurposed existing infrastructure.\\n Conversion strategies require that retrofit pipelines remain operationally safe under the new mode of transportation. From an integrity perspective, the conversion exercise will require understanding the line pipe material’s “DNA” (e.g. grades, hard spots) and assessing the impact of hydrogen on key pipeline mechanical properties (e.g. fracture toughness) and on the tolerance of integrity threats. These threats include those that may already exist from previous hydrocarbon service (e.g. stress-corrosion cracking), those that are directly related to the conversion to hydrogen (e.g. fatigue) and those that are an integral part of a pipeline life cycle (e.g. third-party damages, geohazards). There is currently a lack of clarity within the industry about how to quantify and manage these threats to hydrogen pipelines. How, if at all, should an integrity management strategy for a hydrogen pipeline differ from that of a natural gas pipeline?\\n In order to define the boundaries of the existing North American pipeline network and the starting point for conversion, this paper will conduct an Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) of (i) the pipeline network’s “DNA” (e.g. diameters, thicknesses, grades, fracture toughness, hard spots, age), and (ii) the pipeline threat and condition attributes (e.g. pre-existing crack threats, crack distribution). This paper will take advantage of the knowledge derived from the ROSEN Integrity Data Warehouse (IDW), a global repository of ILI results and Integrity Management, in order to quantify the characteristics specific to North America.\\n A pragmatic approach to safely repurposing existing pipelines to hydrogen service will be then presented in recognition of the identified regional ‘DNA’ and integrity peculiarities, and in respect to applicable local codes and regulations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2022-87088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2022-87088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

氢一直被认为是实现净零碳排放所需的未来能源结构中的重要组成部分。工业规模的氢气部署将需要管道运输,考虑到新管道建设的许多障碍,未来氢气管网的很大一部分似乎不可避免地将由现有基础设施的重新利用组成。转换策略要求改造后的管道在新的运输方式下保持运行安全。从完整性的角度来看,转换作业需要了解管线材料的“DNA”(例如等级、硬点),并评估氢气对管道关键机械性能(例如断裂韧性)和完整性威胁容忍度的影响。这些威胁包括以前碳氢化合物服务中可能已经存在的威胁(例如应力腐蚀开裂),与氢气转化直接相关的威胁(例如疲劳)以及管道生命周期中不可分割的一部分(例如第三方损害,地质灾害)。目前,行业内对于如何量化和管理这些对氢气管道的威胁缺乏明确的认识。氢气管道的完整性管理策略与天然气管道的完整性管理策略有何不同?为了确定现有北美管道网络的边界和转换起点,本文将对(i)管道网络的“DNA”(如直径、厚度、等级、断裂韧性、硬点、年龄)和(ii)管道威胁和状态属性(如预先存在的裂缝威胁、裂缝分布)进行探索性数据分析(EDA)。本文将利用来自ROSEN完整性数据仓库(IDW)的知识,该仓库是ILI结果和完整性管理的全球存储库,以量化北美特有的特征。然后,根据已确定的区域“DNA”和完整性特点,并根据适用的当地法规,提出一种实用的方法,安全地将现有管道重新用于氢气服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safe Repurposing of Vintage Pipelines for Hydrogen in North America
Hydrogen has been championed as a vital player in the future energy mix needed to achieve net-zero carbon emissions. The deployment of hydrogen at an industrial scale will require pipelines for transportation, and given the many obstacles to new pipeline construction, it appears inevitable that a large proportion of the future hydrogen pipeline network will consist of repurposed existing infrastructure. Conversion strategies require that retrofit pipelines remain operationally safe under the new mode of transportation. From an integrity perspective, the conversion exercise will require understanding the line pipe material’s “DNA” (e.g. grades, hard spots) and assessing the impact of hydrogen on key pipeline mechanical properties (e.g. fracture toughness) and on the tolerance of integrity threats. These threats include those that may already exist from previous hydrocarbon service (e.g. stress-corrosion cracking), those that are directly related to the conversion to hydrogen (e.g. fatigue) and those that are an integral part of a pipeline life cycle (e.g. third-party damages, geohazards). There is currently a lack of clarity within the industry about how to quantify and manage these threats to hydrogen pipelines. How, if at all, should an integrity management strategy for a hydrogen pipeline differ from that of a natural gas pipeline? In order to define the boundaries of the existing North American pipeline network and the starting point for conversion, this paper will conduct an Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) of (i) the pipeline network’s “DNA” (e.g. diameters, thicknesses, grades, fracture toughness, hard spots, age), and (ii) the pipeline threat and condition attributes (e.g. pre-existing crack threats, crack distribution). This paper will take advantage of the knowledge derived from the ROSEN Integrity Data Warehouse (IDW), a global repository of ILI results and Integrity Management, in order to quantify the characteristics specific to North America. A pragmatic approach to safely repurposing existing pipelines to hydrogen service will be then presented in recognition of the identified regional ‘DNA’ and integrity peculiarities, and in respect to applicable local codes and regulations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信