基于非粘附亚培养技术的粘膜和球部嗅鞘膜细胞分离新方法

Fatemeh Tirgar, Zahra Azizi, Mahmoudreza Hadjighassem
{"title":"基于非粘附亚培养技术的粘膜和球部嗅鞘膜细胞分离新方法","authors":"Fatemeh Tirgar, Zahra Azizi, Mahmoudreza Hadjighassem","doi":"10.32598/bcn.2022.3579.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) are widely used in transplantation studies. The high purification of this unique cell type is valuable for medical applications. Although recent improvements in OECs isolation procedures opened a new era in this field, the high purification efficacy and viability rate are still of concern. The most widely used OECs isolation techniques can be broadly classified based on adherence properties, particularly in olfactory bulb-derived OEC isolation. Considering the invasive nature of harvesting OECs from human olfactory bulbs, a highly efficient purification of these cells from olfactory mucosa can benefit clinical trials. In this study, we isolated OECs from rats' olfactory bulbs and mucosa due to their differential adherence properties and compared them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cell preparations were characterized by NGFR p75 and S100β antibodies, the specific markers for OECs, using immunocytochemistry and western blot analysis, respectively. OECs morphology and viability were monitored over time by microscopy and MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that OECs could be purified from the olfactory mucosa using our suggested method as efficiently as the olfactory bulb. Both derived OECs showed high levels of NGFR p75 and S100β expression, although the S100β expression was higher in olfactory mucosa-derived OECs preparations (P<0.05). Moreover, there was no significant difference between the two sources in cell viability in our suggested protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Due to the non-invasive harvesting method, olfactory mucosa-derived OECs are preferred from a clinical point of view in transplantation studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8728,"journal":{"name":"Basic and Clinical Neuroscience Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367208/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel Approach for Mucosal and Bulbar Olfactory Ensheathing Cells Isolation Based on the Non-adherent Subculture Technique.\",\"authors\":\"Fatemeh Tirgar, Zahra Azizi, Mahmoudreza Hadjighassem\",\"doi\":\"10.32598/bcn.2022.3579.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) are widely used in transplantation studies. The high purification of this unique cell type is valuable for medical applications. Although recent improvements in OECs isolation procedures opened a new era in this field, the high purification efficacy and viability rate are still of concern. The most widely used OECs isolation techniques can be broadly classified based on adherence properties, particularly in olfactory bulb-derived OEC isolation. Considering the invasive nature of harvesting OECs from human olfactory bulbs, a highly efficient purification of these cells from olfactory mucosa can benefit clinical trials. In this study, we isolated OECs from rats' olfactory bulbs and mucosa due to their differential adherence properties and compared them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cell preparations were characterized by NGFR p75 and S100β antibodies, the specific markers for OECs, using immunocytochemistry and western blot analysis, respectively. OECs morphology and viability were monitored over time by microscopy and MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that OECs could be purified from the olfactory mucosa using our suggested method as efficiently as the olfactory bulb. Both derived OECs showed high levels of NGFR p75 and S100β expression, although the S100β expression was higher in olfactory mucosa-derived OECs preparations (P<0.05). Moreover, there was no significant difference between the two sources in cell viability in our suggested protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Due to the non-invasive harvesting method, olfactory mucosa-derived OECs are preferred from a clinical point of view in transplantation studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Basic and Clinical Neuroscience Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367208/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Basic and Clinical Neuroscience Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32598/bcn.2022.3579.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic and Clinical Neuroscience Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/bcn.2022.3579.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:嗅鞘细胞(OECs)被广泛用于移植研究。这种独特细胞类型的高纯度化对医学应用非常有价值。尽管最近对 OECs 分离程序的改进开创了这一领域的新纪元,但其高纯化率和存活率仍令人担忧。最广泛使用的 OECs 分离技术可根据粘附特性进行大致分类,尤其是在嗅球源性 OEC 分离方面。考虑到从人类嗅球中获取 OECs 的侵入性,从嗅粘膜中高效纯化这些细胞将有利于临床试验。在这项研究中,我们从大鼠的嗅球和粘膜中分离出了具有不同粘附特性的 OECs,并对它们进行了比较:方法:分别使用免疫细胞化学和 Western 印迹分析方法,用 OECs 的特异性标记物 NGFR p75 和 S100β 抗体对细胞制备物进行表征。显微镜和 MTT(3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide)检测法监测 OECs 的形态和活力:结果:我们发现,用我们建议的方法从嗅粘膜纯化 OECs 与从嗅球纯化 OECs 一样有效。两种来源的 OECs 都显示出高水平的 NGFR p75 和 S100β 表达,但 S100β 表达在嗅粘膜来源的 OECs 制剂中更高:由于采用非侵入性采集方法,从临床角度来看,在移植研究中,嗅粘膜源性 OECs 是首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Novel Approach for Mucosal and Bulbar Olfactory Ensheathing Cells Isolation Based on the Non-adherent Subculture Technique.

Introduction: Olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) are widely used in transplantation studies. The high purification of this unique cell type is valuable for medical applications. Although recent improvements in OECs isolation procedures opened a new era in this field, the high purification efficacy and viability rate are still of concern. The most widely used OECs isolation techniques can be broadly classified based on adherence properties, particularly in olfactory bulb-derived OEC isolation. Considering the invasive nature of harvesting OECs from human olfactory bulbs, a highly efficient purification of these cells from olfactory mucosa can benefit clinical trials. In this study, we isolated OECs from rats' olfactory bulbs and mucosa due to their differential adherence properties and compared them.

Methods: Cell preparations were characterized by NGFR p75 and S100β antibodies, the specific markers for OECs, using immunocytochemistry and western blot analysis, respectively. OECs morphology and viability were monitored over time by microscopy and MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay.

Results: We found that OECs could be purified from the olfactory mucosa using our suggested method as efficiently as the olfactory bulb. Both derived OECs showed high levels of NGFR p75 and S100β expression, although the S100β expression was higher in olfactory mucosa-derived OECs preparations (P<0.05). Moreover, there was no significant difference between the two sources in cell viability in our suggested protocol.

Conclusion: Due to the non-invasive harvesting method, olfactory mucosa-derived OECs are preferred from a clinical point of view in transplantation studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信