关于政府合同中赔偿问题的思考

Stanley E. Tracey
{"title":"关于政府合同中赔偿问题的思考","authors":"Stanley E. Tracey","doi":"10.1002/ffej.3330080106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article addresses the subject of indemnification provisions found in “old” (pre-CERCLA) government contracts. Government facilities and their lawyers are increasingly being presented with ancient contract documents containing indemnification provisions that purport to shift the responsibility for paying for CERCLA or CERCLA-like response actions from the contractor to the government. While the government should honor indemnification provisions where appropriate, it is unclear that these general provisions were intended to address environmental liabilities comprehended by CERCLA. The article points out a number of issues which should be considered, in the opinion of the author, before a government lawyer agrees that indemnification is proper. The article concludes that these old indemnification provisions must be reviewed in context and with full consideration of all arguments for and against their application.</p>","PeriodicalId":100523,"journal":{"name":"Federal Facilities Environmental Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"39-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ffej.3330080106","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thoughts concerning indemnification in government contracts\",\"authors\":\"Stanley E. Tracey\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ffej.3330080106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article addresses the subject of indemnification provisions found in “old” (pre-CERCLA) government contracts. Government facilities and their lawyers are increasingly being presented with ancient contract documents containing indemnification provisions that purport to shift the responsibility for paying for CERCLA or CERCLA-like response actions from the contractor to the government. While the government should honor indemnification provisions where appropriate, it is unclear that these general provisions were intended to address environmental liabilities comprehended by CERCLA. The article points out a number of issues which should be considered, in the opinion of the author, before a government lawyer agrees that indemnification is proper. The article concludes that these old indemnification provisions must be reviewed in context and with full consideration of all arguments for and against their application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Federal Facilities Environmental Journal\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"39-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ffej.3330080106\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Federal Facilities Environmental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ffej.3330080106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal Facilities Environmental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ffej.3330080106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论“旧”(cercla之前)政府合同中的赔偿条款。政府机构及其律师越来越多地收到包含赔偿条款的古老合同文件,这些条款旨在将支付CERCLA或类似CERCLA的回应行动的责任从承包商转移到政府。虽然政府应在适当情况下履行赔偿条款,但不清楚这些一般条款是否旨在解决《CERCLA》所理解的环境责任。文章指出,在政府律师同意赔偿是适当的之前,作者认为应该考虑的一些问题。该条的结论是,必须在上下文中审查这些旧的赔偿规定,并充分考虑支持和反对适用这些规定的所有理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thoughts concerning indemnification in government contracts

This article addresses the subject of indemnification provisions found in “old” (pre-CERCLA) government contracts. Government facilities and their lawyers are increasingly being presented with ancient contract documents containing indemnification provisions that purport to shift the responsibility for paying for CERCLA or CERCLA-like response actions from the contractor to the government. While the government should honor indemnification provisions where appropriate, it is unclear that these general provisions were intended to address environmental liabilities comprehended by CERCLA. The article points out a number of issues which should be considered, in the opinion of the author, before a government lawyer agrees that indemnification is proper. The article concludes that these old indemnification provisions must be reviewed in context and with full consideration of all arguments for and against their application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信