急性缺血性脑卒中后动态脑自动调节:经颅多普勒和磁共振成像技术的比较。

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Journal of Development Studies Pub Date : 2016-12-01 Epub Date: 2015-11-05 DOI:10.1177/0271678X15615874
Ronney B Panerai, José L Jara, Nazia P Saeed, Mark A Horsfield, Thompson G Robinson
{"title":"急性缺血性脑卒中后动态脑自动调节:经颅多普勒和磁共振成像技术的比较。","authors":"Ronney B Panerai, José L Jara, Nazia P Saeed, Mark A Horsfield, Thompson G Robinson","doi":"10.1177/0271678X15615874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Novel MRI-based dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) assessment enables the estimation of both global and spatially discriminated autoregulation index values. Before exploring this technique for the evaluation of focal dCA in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) patients, it is necessary to compare global dCA estimates made using both TCD and MRI. Both techniques were used to study 11 AIS patients within 48 h of symptom onset, and nine healthy controls. dCA was assessed by the rate of return of CBFV (R<sub>turn</sub>) following a sudden drop induced by the thigh cuff manoeuvre. No significant between-hemisphere differences were seen in controls using either the TCD or MRI technique. Inter-hemisphere averaged R<sub>turn</sub> values were not different between TCD (1.89 ± 0.67%/s) and MRI (2.07 ± 0.60%/s) either. In patients, there were no differences between the affected and unaffected hemispheres whether assessed by TCD (R<sub>turn</sub> 0.67 ± 0.72 vs. 0.98 ± 1.09%/s) or MRI (0.55 ± 1.51 vs. 1.63 ± 0.63%/s). R<sub>turn</sub> for both TCD and MRI was impaired in AIS patients compared to controls in both unaffected and affected hemispheres (ANOVA, p = 0.00005). These findings pave the way for wider use of MRI for dCA assessment in health and disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":48295,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Development Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":"2194-2202"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0271678X15615874","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic cerebral autoregulation following acute ischaemic stroke: Comparison of transcranial Doppler and magnetic resonance imaging techniques.\",\"authors\":\"Ronney B Panerai, José L Jara, Nazia P Saeed, Mark A Horsfield, Thompson G Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0271678X15615874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Novel MRI-based dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) assessment enables the estimation of both global and spatially discriminated autoregulation index values. Before exploring this technique for the evaluation of focal dCA in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) patients, it is necessary to compare global dCA estimates made using both TCD and MRI. Both techniques were used to study 11 AIS patients within 48 h of symptom onset, and nine healthy controls. dCA was assessed by the rate of return of CBFV (R<sub>turn</sub>) following a sudden drop induced by the thigh cuff manoeuvre. No significant between-hemisphere differences were seen in controls using either the TCD or MRI technique. Inter-hemisphere averaged R<sub>turn</sub> values were not different between TCD (1.89 ± 0.67%/s) and MRI (2.07 ± 0.60%/s) either. In patients, there were no differences between the affected and unaffected hemispheres whether assessed by TCD (R<sub>turn</sub> 0.67 ± 0.72 vs. 0.98 ± 1.09%/s) or MRI (0.55 ± 1.51 vs. 1.63 ± 0.63%/s). R<sub>turn</sub> for both TCD and MRI was impaired in AIS patients compared to controls in both unaffected and affected hemispheres (ANOVA, p = 0.00005). These findings pave the way for wider use of MRI for dCA assessment in health and disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Development Studies\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"2194-2202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0271678X15615874\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Development Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X15615874\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/11/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X15615874","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

新的基于mri的动态大脑自动调节(dCA)评估能够估计全局和空间区分的自动调节指数值。在探索该技术评估急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者局灶性dCA之前,有必要比较TCD和MRI对全局dCA的估计。这两种技术用于研究11名症状出现48小时内的AIS患者和9名健康对照者。dCA通过大腿袖带运动引起的突然下降后CBFV的回复率(Rturn)来评估。在使用TCD或MRI技术的对照组中,没有发现明显的半球间差异。TCD与MRI的半球间平均Rturn值(1.89±0.67%/s)差异无统计学意义(2.07±0.60%/s)。在患者中,无论是TCD评估(Rturn 0.67±0.72 vs 0.98±1.09%/s)还是MRI评估(Rturn 0.55±1.51 vs 1.63±0.63%/s),受影响的半球和未受影响的半球之间都没有差异。与未受影响和受影响的大脑半球相比,AIS患者TCD和MRI的复归率均受损(方差分析,p = 0.00005)。这些发现为MRI在健康和疾病dCA评估中的广泛应用铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dynamic cerebral autoregulation following acute ischaemic stroke: Comparison of transcranial Doppler and magnetic resonance imaging techniques.

Novel MRI-based dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) assessment enables the estimation of both global and spatially discriminated autoregulation index values. Before exploring this technique for the evaluation of focal dCA in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) patients, it is necessary to compare global dCA estimates made using both TCD and MRI. Both techniques were used to study 11 AIS patients within 48 h of symptom onset, and nine healthy controls. dCA was assessed by the rate of return of CBFV (Rturn) following a sudden drop induced by the thigh cuff manoeuvre. No significant between-hemisphere differences were seen in controls using either the TCD or MRI technique. Inter-hemisphere averaged Rturn values were not different between TCD (1.89 ± 0.67%/s) and MRI (2.07 ± 0.60%/s) either. In patients, there were no differences between the affected and unaffected hemispheres whether assessed by TCD (Rturn 0.67 ± 0.72 vs. 0.98 ± 1.09%/s) or MRI (0.55 ± 1.51 vs. 1.63 ± 0.63%/s). Rturn for both TCD and MRI was impaired in AIS patients compared to controls in both unaffected and affected hemispheres (ANOVA, p = 0.00005). These findings pave the way for wider use of MRI for dCA assessment in health and disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
138
期刊介绍: The Journal of Development Studies was the first and is one of the best known international journals in the area of development studies. Since its foundation in 1964, it has published many seminal articles on development and opened up new areas of debate. Priority is given to papers which are: • relevant to important current research in development policy, theory and analysis • make a novel and significant contribution to the field • provide critical tests, based on empirical work, of alternative theories, perspectives or schools of thought We invite articles that are interdisciplinary or focused on particular disciplines (e.g. economics, politics, geography, sociology or anthropology), with an expectation that all work is accessible to readers across the social sciences. The editors also welcome surveys of the literature in important fields of development policy. All research articles in this journal undergo rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous peer review. Given the high level of submissions, a majority of submissions are rejected quickly with reasons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信