提摩太前书2,1和托马斯·阿奎那的论述

Q3 Arts and Humanities

Sacris Erudiri Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1484/j.se.5.119452

Innocent Smith

{"title":"提摩太前书2,1和托马斯·阿奎那的论述","authors":"Innocent Smith","doi":"10.1484/j.se.5.119452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thomas Aquinas frequently refers to 1 Tim 2, 1 in his discussions of the liturgical structure of the Mass. In his use of this verse, Thomas draws on a tradition of liturgical exegesis dating to Augustine of Hippo which pairs the four types of prayer named by Paul with the different parts of the Mass. This essay first analyzes the three main passages where Thomas draws on this tradition. It then describes the original context of Augustine’s articulation of this tradition and traces the reception of Augustine’s exegesis in Haimo of Auxerre and the Glossa Ordinaria. It concludes with a comparison of the Glossa Ordinaria and Thomas Aquinas’s writings, showing how Thomas benefitted from this tradition of interpretation while remaining free to adapt it to his own needs.","PeriodicalId":39610,"journal":{"name":"Sacris Erudiri","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"1 Timothy 2, 1 and the Expositiones Missae of Thomas Aquinas\",\"authors\":\"Innocent Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1484/j.se.5.119452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Thomas Aquinas frequently refers to 1 Tim 2, 1 in his discussions of the liturgical structure of the Mass. In his use of this verse, Thomas draws on a tradition of liturgical exegesis dating to Augustine of Hippo which pairs the four types of prayer named by Paul with the different parts of the Mass. This essay first analyzes the three main passages where Thomas draws on this tradition. It then describes the original context of Augustine’s articulation of this tradition and traces the reception of Augustine’s exegesis in Haimo of Auxerre and the Glossa Ordinaria. It concludes with a comparison of the Glossa Ordinaria and Thomas Aquinas’s writings, showing how Thomas benefitted from this tradition of interpretation while remaining free to adapt it to his own needs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sacris Erudiri\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sacris Erudiri\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1484/j.se.5.119452\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sacris Erudiri","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1484/j.se.5.119452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

托马斯·阿奎那在讨论弥撒的礼仪结构时经常提到提摩太前书2,1。在他使用这节经文时，托马斯借鉴了追溯到河马奥古斯丁的礼仪训诂传统，将保罗命名的四种祈祷类型与弥撒的不同部分配对。这篇文章首先分析了托马斯借鉴这一传统的三个主要段落。然后，它描述了奥古斯丁对这一传统的表述的原始背景，并追溯了奥古斯丁在《欧塞尔的海默》和《普通词汇》中对训诂的接受情况。最后对《日常指南》和托马斯·阿奎那的著作进行比较，表明托马斯是如何从这种解释传统中受益的，同时又能自由地根据自己的需要进行调整。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

1 Timothy 2, 1 and the Expositiones Missae of Thomas Aquinas

Thomas Aquinas frequently refers to 1 Tim 2, 1 in his discussions of the liturgical structure of the Mass. In his use of this verse, Thomas draws on a tradition of liturgical exegesis dating to Augustine of Hippo which pairs the four types of prayer named by Paul with the different parts of the Mass. This essay first analyzes the three main passages where Thomas draws on this tradition. It then describes the original context of Augustine’s articulation of this tradition and traces the reception of Augustine’s exegesis in Haimo of Auxerre and the Glossa Ordinaria. It concludes with a comparison of the Glossa Ordinaria and Thomas Aquinas’s writings, showing how Thomas benefitted from this tradition of interpretation while remaining free to adapt it to his own needs.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Sacris Erudiri Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Sacris Erudiri is an international journal of religious sciences in its broadest sense. Studies published refer mainly to the history of the Church, the history of liturgy and patristics. Whilst excluding nothing, the topics addressed refer more to factual and institutional history than to doctrinal history. These articles often represent preliminary analyses for later critical editions of patristic and medieval texts to be published in various series of the Corpus Christianorum. Articles are published in English, French, German, Italian and Spanish.