学生批判性思维水平的认知意识与调查

Mustafa Durmuşçelebi, Beyza Nur Kuşuçuran
{"title":"学生批判性思维水平的认知意识与调查","authors":"Mustafa Durmuşçelebi, Beyza Nur Kuşuçuran","doi":"10.18844/ijire.v5i4.3975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nNew concepts, new skills and new perspectives are emerging in the social sciences in the face of dazzling developments in science, health and technology sciences. Continuous studies are carried out both in the programs and in the learning processes in order to gain the features that should be found in the people of tomorrow. In this context, cognitive awareness, which means that the individual learns the ways of learning linguistic ways, in other words, the ability to regulate the individual's cognition and to think critically is considered to be one of the characteristics of the future person. For the first time, Flavell introduced the concept in 1976, using the term beyond memory in a study he conducted on children's advanced memory capabilities, and introduced this concept in his literature. In 1979 Flavell, who improved his work, reconstructed his theory, including the cognition. Together with Flavell's theory, studies on the cognitive studies continued until today. Although the concept of cognitive is expressed in different concepts and meanings, in general, the individual's knowledge about his / her own system, structure and work. The difference between cognition and cognition is cognition, being aware of something, understanding it while being cognitive, being aware of how they learn it, knowing how to learn it. The aim of this study is to determine the levels of cognitive awareness and critical thinking skills of the students and to examine the relationship between the two characteristics. For this purpose, questions were asked to what extent the levels of critical thinking and levels of cognitive awareness were different, and to what extent the levels of these two dependent variables differed according to independent variables such as gender, level of education and degree of study, academic success level  \nand frequency of reading. A total of 534 students from 7 faculties and colleges of Erciyes University participated in this study. The lilik Adult Cognitive Ability Test miş which was used in the research was developed by Schraw and Dennison in 1994, translated into Turkish in Ozcan (2007) and carried out linguistic equivalence, validity and reliability studies. Schraw and Dennison discuss cognitive skills under two main headings: cognitive characteristics and cognitive skills. They formed 8 subdimensions (factors) for both sections. As a result of the factor analyzes, it was found appropriate to consider two factors as ası cognitive characteristics, cognitive skills regulation düzenlen in accordance with the first parts of the scale. The tedir Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (CPI) ”consists of 52 questions and is marked on a five-point Likert-type scale. The score range is 52-260. E California Critical Thinking Tendency Scale (CEDEÖ) iler was used to determine the students' critical thinking dispositions. The scale has 7 subscales and 51 items which are both theoretically determined and psychometrically tested. The adaptation of the scale to Turkish was done by Kökdemir (2003) on 913 students. The scale was prepared according to the 6 -point Likert type in the -I strongly disagree ’and ında fully agree” range. The lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 51, and the highest score is 306. In addition, the personal information form, which contains information containing independent variables, was prepared by the researcher. Since the scales were applied to a similar group, a validity safety study was not performed and validity studies were accepted as sufficient. In order to determine the relationships between variables, the central correlation and the correlation coefficients were used. In order to determine the differences according to the independent variables, t-test and multiple comparisons were used to determine the differences. Post-Hoc test was used for hoc tests. Data were analyzed with SPSS 22 package program. In the analyzes, it is seen that the levels of both cognitive awareness and critical thinking are higher than the students. \n \n \n \n \nKeywords: Critical thinking, reflective thinking, cognitive awareness \n \n \n \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":13793,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Students' Cognitive Awareness and Investigation of Critical Thinking Levels\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Durmuşçelebi, Beyza Nur Kuşuçuran\",\"doi\":\"10.18844/ijire.v5i4.3975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\nNew concepts, new skills and new perspectives are emerging in the social sciences in the face of dazzling developments in science, health and technology sciences. Continuous studies are carried out both in the programs and in the learning processes in order to gain the features that should be found in the people of tomorrow. In this context, cognitive awareness, which means that the individual learns the ways of learning linguistic ways, in other words, the ability to regulate the individual's cognition and to think critically is considered to be one of the characteristics of the future person. For the first time, Flavell introduced the concept in 1976, using the term beyond memory in a study he conducted on children's advanced memory capabilities, and introduced this concept in his literature. In 1979 Flavell, who improved his work, reconstructed his theory, including the cognition. Together with Flavell's theory, studies on the cognitive studies continued until today. Although the concept of cognitive is expressed in different concepts and meanings, in general, the individual's knowledge about his / her own system, structure and work. The difference between cognition and cognition is cognition, being aware of something, understanding it while being cognitive, being aware of how they learn it, knowing how to learn it. The aim of this study is to determine the levels of cognitive awareness and critical thinking skills of the students and to examine the relationship between the two characteristics. For this purpose, questions were asked to what extent the levels of critical thinking and levels of cognitive awareness were different, and to what extent the levels of these two dependent variables differed according to independent variables such as gender, level of education and degree of study, academic success level  \\nand frequency of reading. A total of 534 students from 7 faculties and colleges of Erciyes University participated in this study. The lilik Adult Cognitive Ability Test miş which was used in the research was developed by Schraw and Dennison in 1994, translated into Turkish in Ozcan (2007) and carried out linguistic equivalence, validity and reliability studies. Schraw and Dennison discuss cognitive skills under two main headings: cognitive characteristics and cognitive skills. They formed 8 subdimensions (factors) for both sections. As a result of the factor analyzes, it was found appropriate to consider two factors as ası cognitive characteristics, cognitive skills regulation düzenlen in accordance with the first parts of the scale. The tedir Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (CPI) ”consists of 52 questions and is marked on a five-point Likert-type scale. The score range is 52-260. E California Critical Thinking Tendency Scale (CEDEÖ) iler was used to determine the students' critical thinking dispositions. The scale has 7 subscales and 51 items which are both theoretically determined and psychometrically tested. The adaptation of the scale to Turkish was done by Kökdemir (2003) on 913 students. The scale was prepared according to the 6 -point Likert type in the -I strongly disagree ’and ında fully agree” range. The lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 51, and the highest score is 306. In addition, the personal information form, which contains information containing independent variables, was prepared by the researcher. Since the scales were applied to a similar group, a validity safety study was not performed and validity studies were accepted as sufficient. In order to determine the relationships between variables, the central correlation and the correlation coefficients were used. In order to determine the differences according to the independent variables, t-test and multiple comparisons were used to determine the differences. Post-Hoc test was used for hoc tests. Data were analyzed with SPSS 22 package program. In the analyzes, it is seen that the levels of both cognitive awareness and critical thinking are higher than the students. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nKeywords: Critical thinking, reflective thinking, cognitive awareness \\n \\n \\n \\n \\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":13793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18844/ijire.v5i4.3975\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18844/ijire.v5i4.3975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

面对科学、卫生和技术科学令人眼花缭乱的发展,社会科学正在出现新概念、新技能和新观点。在课程和学习过程中都进行了持续的研究,以获得未来人们应该拥有的特征。在这种背景下,认知意识,即个体学会了学习语言方式的方式,换句话说,调节个体认知和批判性思考的能力被认为是未来人的特征之一。1976年,Flavell第一次引入了这个概念,在他对儿童高级记忆能力的研究中使用了“超越记忆”这个术语,并在他的文献中引入了这个概念。1979年,弗拉维尔改进了他的工作,重建了他的理论,包括认知。与弗拉威尔的理论一起,对认知研究的研究一直持续到今天。虽然认知的概念有不同的概念和含义,但总的来说,个体对自己的系统、结构和工作的认识。认知和认知的区别在于认知,意识到某事,在认知的同时理解它,意识到他们是如何学习它的,知道如何学习它。本研究的目的是确定学生的认知意识和批判性思维技能的水平,并检查这两个特征之间的关系。为此,研究人员询问了批判性思维水平和认知意识水平在多大程度上不同,以及根据性别、教育水平和学习程度、学业成功水平和阅读频率等自变量,这两个因变量的水平在多大程度上不同。来自埃尔西耶斯大学7个学院的534名学生参与了本研究。本研究中使用的lilik成人认知能力测试miu由Schraw和Dennison于1994年开发,在Ozcan(2007)中翻译成土耳其语,并进行了语言等效性、效度和信度研究。Schraw和Dennison在两个主要标题下讨论了认知技能:认知特征和认知技能。它们为这两个部分形成了8个子维度(因子)。通过对因素的分析,我们发现可以根据量表的第一部分,考虑两个因素作为认知特征、认知技能调节dzenlen。tedir元认知意识量表(CPI)由52个问题组成,并以李克特五分制进行评分。得分范围是52-260。采用加州批判性思维倾向量表(CEDEÖ)来测定学生的批判性思维倾向。量表有7个子量表和51个项目,既有理论确定的,也有心理测量测试的。Kökdemir(2003)对913名学生进行了量表的土耳其语改编。量表是根据6分李克特类型在“-我强烈不同意”和ında完全同意”范围内编制的。从量表中可以得到的最低分数为51分,最高分数为306分。此外,个人信息表是由研究者准备的,其中包含了自变量信息。由于量表应用于相似的群体,因此没有进行有效性安全性研究,有效性研究被认为是充分的。为了确定变量之间的关系,使用了中心相关和相关系数。为了根据自变量确定差异,采用t检验和多重比较来确定差异。事后检验用于临时检验。数据分析采用SPSS 22软件包程序。在分析中可以看出,学生的认知意识和批判性思维水平都高于学生。关键词:批判性思维,反思性思维,认知意识
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Students' Cognitive Awareness and Investigation of Critical Thinking Levels
New concepts, new skills and new perspectives are emerging in the social sciences in the face of dazzling developments in science, health and technology sciences. Continuous studies are carried out both in the programs and in the learning processes in order to gain the features that should be found in the people of tomorrow. In this context, cognitive awareness, which means that the individual learns the ways of learning linguistic ways, in other words, the ability to regulate the individual's cognition and to think critically is considered to be one of the characteristics of the future person. For the first time, Flavell introduced the concept in 1976, using the term beyond memory in a study he conducted on children's advanced memory capabilities, and introduced this concept in his literature. In 1979 Flavell, who improved his work, reconstructed his theory, including the cognition. Together with Flavell's theory, studies on the cognitive studies continued until today. Although the concept of cognitive is expressed in different concepts and meanings, in general, the individual's knowledge about his / her own system, structure and work. The difference between cognition and cognition is cognition, being aware of something, understanding it while being cognitive, being aware of how they learn it, knowing how to learn it. The aim of this study is to determine the levels of cognitive awareness and critical thinking skills of the students and to examine the relationship between the two characteristics. For this purpose, questions were asked to what extent the levels of critical thinking and levels of cognitive awareness were different, and to what extent the levels of these two dependent variables differed according to independent variables such as gender, level of education and degree of study, academic success level  and frequency of reading. A total of 534 students from 7 faculties and colleges of Erciyes University participated in this study. The lilik Adult Cognitive Ability Test miş which was used in the research was developed by Schraw and Dennison in 1994, translated into Turkish in Ozcan (2007) and carried out linguistic equivalence, validity and reliability studies. Schraw and Dennison discuss cognitive skills under two main headings: cognitive characteristics and cognitive skills. They formed 8 subdimensions (factors) for both sections. As a result of the factor analyzes, it was found appropriate to consider two factors as ası cognitive characteristics, cognitive skills regulation düzenlen in accordance with the first parts of the scale. The tedir Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (CPI) ”consists of 52 questions and is marked on a five-point Likert-type scale. The score range is 52-260. E California Critical Thinking Tendency Scale (CEDEÖ) iler was used to determine the students' critical thinking dispositions. The scale has 7 subscales and 51 items which are both theoretically determined and psychometrically tested. The adaptation of the scale to Turkish was done by Kökdemir (2003) on 913 students. The scale was prepared according to the 6 -point Likert type in the -I strongly disagree ’and ında fully agree” range. The lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 51, and the highest score is 306. In addition, the personal information form, which contains information containing independent variables, was prepared by the researcher. Since the scales were applied to a similar group, a validity safety study was not performed and validity studies were accepted as sufficient. In order to determine the relationships between variables, the central correlation and the correlation coefficients were used. In order to determine the differences according to the independent variables, t-test and multiple comparisons were used to determine the differences. Post-Hoc test was used for hoc tests. Data were analyzed with SPSS 22 package program. In the analyzes, it is seen that the levels of both cognitive awareness and critical thinking are higher than the students. Keywords: Critical thinking, reflective thinking, cognitive awareness
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信