内收管与股骨连续周围神经阻滞用于膝关节置换术:一项为期一年的2项随机对照临床试验的跟踪研究

E. Davidson, Anthony T Machi, Jacklynn F. Sztain, Nicholas J. Kormylo, S. Madison, Wendy B. Abramson, Amanda M. Monahan, Bahareh Khatibi, S. Ball, Francis B. Gonzales, D. Sessler, B. Ilfeld
{"title":"内收管与股骨连续周围神经阻滞用于膝关节置换术:一项为期一年的2项随机对照临床试验的跟踪研究","authors":"E. Davidson, Anthony T Machi, Jacklynn F. Sztain, Nicholas J. Kormylo, S. Madison, Wendy B. Abramson, Amanda M. Monahan, Bahareh Khatibi, S. Ball, Francis B. Gonzales, D. Sessler, B. Ilfeld","doi":"10.4172/2155-6148.1000838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Davidson, Evan N. | Abstract: For patients undergoing tricompartment or unicompartment knee arthroplasty, previous studies have shown that a continuous femoral block provides superior analgesia in various circumstances compared with a continuous adductor canal block during the local anesthetic infusion. However, the long-term outcomes of these two approaches remains unknown. We thus evaluated functional outcomes with each approach 1, 4, and 12 months after surgery.","PeriodicalId":15000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research","volume":"6 1","pages":"1-1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adductor Canal vs. Femoral Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Knee Arthroplasty: A One-year Follow-up Pilot Study of 2 Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trials\",\"authors\":\"E. Davidson, Anthony T Machi, Jacklynn F. Sztain, Nicholas J. Kormylo, S. Madison, Wendy B. Abramson, Amanda M. Monahan, Bahareh Khatibi, S. Ball, Francis B. Gonzales, D. Sessler, B. Ilfeld\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2155-6148.1000838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Author(s): Davidson, Evan N. | Abstract: For patients undergoing tricompartment or unicompartment knee arthroplasty, previous studies have shown that a continuous femoral block provides superior analgesia in various circumstances compared with a continuous adductor canal block during the local anesthetic infusion. However, the long-term outcomes of these two approaches remains unknown. We thus evaluated functional outcomes with each approach 1, 4, and 12 months after surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"1-1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6148.1000838\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6148.1000838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:对于接受三腔室或单腔室膝关节置换术的患者,先前的研究表明,在局部麻醉输注期间,与连续内收管阻滞相比,连续股动脉阻滞在各种情况下提供更好的镇痛效果。然而,这两种方法的长期效果尚不清楚。因此,我们在术后1、4和12个月评估了每种入路的功能结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adductor Canal vs. Femoral Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Knee Arthroplasty: A One-year Follow-up Pilot Study of 2 Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trials
Author(s): Davidson, Evan N. | Abstract: For patients undergoing tricompartment or unicompartment knee arthroplasty, previous studies have shown that a continuous femoral block provides superior analgesia in various circumstances compared with a continuous adductor canal block during the local anesthetic infusion. However, the long-term outcomes of these two approaches remains unknown. We thus evaluated functional outcomes with each approach 1, 4, and 12 months after surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信