胸椎不同主动脉段血管内移植术的效果。

G. Melissano, L. Bertoglio, E. Civilini, E. Marone, G. Calori, F. Setacci, R. Chiesa
{"title":"胸椎不同主动脉段血管内移植术的效果。","authors":"G. Melissano, L. Bertoglio, E. Civilini, E. Marone, G. Calori, F. Setacci, R. Chiesa","doi":"10.1583/1545-1550(2007)14[150:ROTEGI]2.0.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nTo compare the results of thoracic endovascular grafting of different aortic segments performed with commercially available stent-grafts.\n\n\nMETHODS\nBetween January 1999 and October 2006, 178 patients (150 men; mean age 69.4+/-10.2 years) underwent endovascular grafting of the thoracic aorta (68 hybrid procedures) with commercially produced stent-grafts from 4 manufacturers. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the aortic segment involved: 64 aortic arch cases (37 hybrids for supra-aortic trunks revascularization), 100 descending thoracic aorta (DTA) cases (17 hybrid: 12 for access and 5 for associated abdominal aortic aneurysm), and 14 thoracoabdominal aorta (TaA) patients excluded from conventional repair (14 hybrids for renal and splanchnic revascularization).\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe technical success was 93.8% (167/178). Overall 30-day mortality was 5.6% (10/178). There were 10 (5.6%) type I endoleaks. Initial clinical success was 88.2% (157/178). At a mean follow-up of 29.3+/-21.2 months, the midterm clinical success was 89.9% (160/178). In the arch group, the technical success was 85.9% (55/64). Thirty-day mortality was 6.3% (4/64). There were 8 (12.5%) type I endoleaks. Initial and midterm clinical success rates were 79.7% (51/64) and 85.9% (55/64), respectively. In the 100-patient DTA group, the technical success was 98.0%. Thirty-day mortality was 2.0%. The type I endoleak rate was 2.0%. Clinical success was 96.0% initially and 95.0% at midterm. All 14 of the TaA cases were completed successfully, but 30-day mortality was 28.6% (4/14). There were no type I endoleaks. Clinical success rates initially and at midterm were both 71.4% (10/14).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nOver the last 6 years, synergy between endovascular and surgical procedures allowed treatment of all segments of the thoracic aorta. Overall perioperative and medium-term results were reasonably favorable; however, they were more satisfactory when the descending thoracic aorta alone was involved. Hybrid procedures allowed treatment of all aortic segments, but they decreased the success rates significantly. Endovascular grafting is currently our preferred method of treating pathologies involving the DTA and aortic arch, while our data suggest limiting the use of stent-grafts to high-risk patients or compassionate indications when the thoracoabdominal aorta is involved.","PeriodicalId":60152,"journal":{"name":"血管与腔内血管外科杂志","volume":"48 1","pages":"150-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"39","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Results of thoracic endovascular grafting in different aortic segments.\",\"authors\":\"G. Melissano, L. Bertoglio, E. Civilini, E. Marone, G. Calori, F. Setacci, R. Chiesa\",\"doi\":\"10.1583/1545-1550(2007)14[150:ROTEGI]2.0.CO;2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\nTo compare the results of thoracic endovascular grafting of different aortic segments performed with commercially available stent-grafts.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nBetween January 1999 and October 2006, 178 patients (150 men; mean age 69.4+/-10.2 years) underwent endovascular grafting of the thoracic aorta (68 hybrid procedures) with commercially produced stent-grafts from 4 manufacturers. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the aortic segment involved: 64 aortic arch cases (37 hybrids for supra-aortic trunks revascularization), 100 descending thoracic aorta (DTA) cases (17 hybrid: 12 for access and 5 for associated abdominal aortic aneurysm), and 14 thoracoabdominal aorta (TaA) patients excluded from conventional repair (14 hybrids for renal and splanchnic revascularization).\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThe technical success was 93.8% (167/178). Overall 30-day mortality was 5.6% (10/178). There were 10 (5.6%) type I endoleaks. Initial clinical success was 88.2% (157/178). At a mean follow-up of 29.3+/-21.2 months, the midterm clinical success was 89.9% (160/178). In the arch group, the technical success was 85.9% (55/64). Thirty-day mortality was 6.3% (4/64). There were 8 (12.5%) type I endoleaks. Initial and midterm clinical success rates were 79.7% (51/64) and 85.9% (55/64), respectively. In the 100-patient DTA group, the technical success was 98.0%. Thirty-day mortality was 2.0%. The type I endoleak rate was 2.0%. Clinical success was 96.0% initially and 95.0% at midterm. All 14 of the TaA cases were completed successfully, but 30-day mortality was 28.6% (4/14). There were no type I endoleaks. Clinical success rates initially and at midterm were both 71.4% (10/14).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nOver the last 6 years, synergy between endovascular and surgical procedures allowed treatment of all segments of the thoracic aorta. Overall perioperative and medium-term results were reasonably favorable; however, they were more satisfactory when the descending thoracic aorta alone was involved. Hybrid procedures allowed treatment of all aortic segments, but they decreased the success rates significantly. Endovascular grafting is currently our preferred method of treating pathologies involving the DTA and aortic arch, while our data suggest limiting the use of stent-grafts to high-risk patients or compassionate indications when the thoracoabdominal aorta is involved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":60152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"血管与腔内血管外科杂志\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"150-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"39\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"血管与腔内血管外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1583/1545-1550(2007)14[150:ROTEGI]2.0.CO;2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"血管与腔内血管外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1583/1545-1550(2007)14[150:ROTEGI]2.0.CO;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

摘要

目的比较不同主动脉段血管内移植与市售支架移植的效果。方法1999年1月至2006年10月,178例患者(男性150例;平均年龄69.4±10.2岁)接受血管内胸主动脉移植术(68种混合手术),由4家制造商生产商业化支架。根据受累主动脉段分为3组:主动脉弓64例(主动脉上干血运重建术混合型37例),胸降主动脉(DTA) 100例(混合型17例:通道型12例,相关腹主动脉瘤混合型5例),排除常规修复的胸腹主动脉(TaA) 14例(肾、脾混合型14例)。结果技术成功率为93.8%(167/178)。总体30天死亡率为5.6%(10/178)。I型渗漏10例(5.6%)。初步临床成功率为88.2%(157/178)。平均随访29.3+/-21.2个月,中期临床成功率为89.9%(160/178)。弓组技术成功率为85.9%(55/64)。30天死亡率为6.3%(4/64)。I型渗漏8例(12.5%)。初期和中期临床成功率分别为79.7%(51/64)和85.9%(55/64)。在100例DTA组中,技术成功率为98.0%。30天死亡率为2.0%。I型内漏率为2.0%。初期临床成功率为96.0%,中期为95.0%。14例TaA均成功完成,但30天死亡率为28.6%(4/14)。没有I型渗漏。初期和中期临床成功率均为71.4%(10/14)。结论:在过去的6年中,血管内和外科手术的协同作用使胸主动脉的所有节段都得到了治疗。总体围手术期和中期结果相当良好;然而,当仅累及胸降主动脉时,他们更令人满意。混合手术可以治疗所有主动脉段,但成功率明显降低。血管内移植目前是我们治疗DTA和主动脉弓病变的首选方法,但我们的数据表明,当涉及胸腹主动脉时,限制高风险患者或同情指征的支架移植的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Results of thoracic endovascular grafting in different aortic segments.
PURPOSE To compare the results of thoracic endovascular grafting of different aortic segments performed with commercially available stent-grafts. METHODS Between January 1999 and October 2006, 178 patients (150 men; mean age 69.4+/-10.2 years) underwent endovascular grafting of the thoracic aorta (68 hybrid procedures) with commercially produced stent-grafts from 4 manufacturers. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the aortic segment involved: 64 aortic arch cases (37 hybrids for supra-aortic trunks revascularization), 100 descending thoracic aorta (DTA) cases (17 hybrid: 12 for access and 5 for associated abdominal aortic aneurysm), and 14 thoracoabdominal aorta (TaA) patients excluded from conventional repair (14 hybrids for renal and splanchnic revascularization). RESULTS The technical success was 93.8% (167/178). Overall 30-day mortality was 5.6% (10/178). There were 10 (5.6%) type I endoleaks. Initial clinical success was 88.2% (157/178). At a mean follow-up of 29.3+/-21.2 months, the midterm clinical success was 89.9% (160/178). In the arch group, the technical success was 85.9% (55/64). Thirty-day mortality was 6.3% (4/64). There were 8 (12.5%) type I endoleaks. Initial and midterm clinical success rates were 79.7% (51/64) and 85.9% (55/64), respectively. In the 100-patient DTA group, the technical success was 98.0%. Thirty-day mortality was 2.0%. The type I endoleak rate was 2.0%. Clinical success was 96.0% initially and 95.0% at midterm. All 14 of the TaA cases were completed successfully, but 30-day mortality was 28.6% (4/14). There were no type I endoleaks. Clinical success rates initially and at midterm were both 71.4% (10/14). CONCLUSION Over the last 6 years, synergy between endovascular and surgical procedures allowed treatment of all segments of the thoracic aorta. Overall perioperative and medium-term results were reasonably favorable; however, they were more satisfactory when the descending thoracic aorta alone was involved. Hybrid procedures allowed treatment of all aortic segments, but they decreased the success rates significantly. Endovascular grafting is currently our preferred method of treating pathologies involving the DTA and aortic arch, while our data suggest limiting the use of stent-grafts to high-risk patients or compassionate indications when the thoracoabdominal aorta is involved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
947
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信